PL
This article considers some controversy around efficiency confirmations of non-therapeutic narrative methods of supporting adults development. The possibility of constructing complete evaluation of using narrative methods which will satisfy representatives of different science paradigms stays under many significant limits. Such preference in the classical positivistic paradigm of efficiency confirmations as measurement, stability and repetition of effects or interferences factor control not suits to phenomenological character of preliminary changes related by narrative group participants. That is why this article stresses the important task of using in the process of seeking the “efficiency confirmations” of narrative methods the larger theoretical context of supporting human development relating to hermeneutic and phenomenological-existential versions of narrative psychology.