May contracts be entirely free? Some comparative remarks on various approaches to freedom of contract

• Authors: Marzec Łukasz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The range of the real freedom of contracts in private law was both a growth factor of societies as well as a measure of the extent of their internal changes. The practice worked out by the Roman lawyers, though limited formally by contract nominalism, became the basis of modern-day solutions. In spite of a simultaneous reconstruction of the social and economic systems which may be summed up after H. Maine as a development from status to contract – the principles of the freedom of contract together with their fundamental limitations, had remained valid. In this context, one may mention the laws which protect the rights of economically weaker subjects, such as the ban on the loss of the pledged asset (lex commissoria), the permissible relation of the price to the value during sale transactions (laesio enormis), maximum prices on basic goods (edictum Diocletanii de pretiis rerum venalium). A special but continually valid issue which is analyzed, among others by Cicero, is that of mutual honesty of vendors and purchasers: to what extent can they make use of the information which is unknown to the other party; at what point we can say that they have overstepped the boundary-line of stratagem. As regards the latter issue, there is no uniformity of opinion in different legal systems; it seems that it is the principle of maximum facilitation of trade that takes the upper hand and is not unknown to the Roman law. The author of the article also analyzes the beginnings of actio de dolo and the different contemporary court experience. In conclusion, the author poses an open question concerning the future of contract law in view of the too far advanced freedom of contracts

Keywords

EN

freedom of contracts; freedom of agreements; contract nominalism; pledged asset; loss of pledged asset; just price; sale; stratagem; error; comparative study; private law; Roman law

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Jagielloński
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 59–67

Dates

online

2014

Contributors

author

Marzec Łukasz

• Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland

References

• Ch. Becker, Die Lehre von der laesio enormis in der Sicht der heutigen Wucherproblematik: Ausgewongenheit der Vertragsverhältnisse und der 138 BGB, Kolonia 1993.
• A. Biscardi, La „lex commissoria nel sistema delle garanzie reali [in:] Studi in onore E. Betti, vol. II, Milano 1962.
• A. Burdese, Lex commissoria e ius vendendi nella fi ducia e nel pignus, Torino 1949.
• P. Bülow, Recht der Kreditsicherheiten: Sachen und Rechte, Personen, Hüthig Jehle Rehm 2012.
• D. McCarthy, International Business History: A Contextual and Case Approach, Greenwood Publishing Group 1994.
• P. Cserne, Freedom of Contract and Paternalism,Palgrave Macmillan2012.
• N. Davies, Rising '44: The Battle for Warsaw, Penguin Books 2005.
• W. Decock, J. Hallebeek, Pre-contractual duties to inform in Early Modern Scholasticism “Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis“ 2010, vol. 1-2.
• N. Enonchong, Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionable Dealing, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd 2006.
• E.A. Farnsworth, Comparative Contract Law [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, red. M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann, Oxford University Press 2006.
• W. Flume, Der Kauf von Kunstgegenständen und die Urheberschaft des Kunstwerkes, „Juristen Zeitung“ 1991, t. 13.
• P. Freeza, La garanzie delle obbligazioni. Corso di diritto Romano II, Padova 1963.
• T. Giaro, Römische Rechtswahrheiten: ein Gedankenexperiment, Vittorio Klostermann 2007.
• D.C. Hansley, Securities Regulation – Trading by Insiders – S.E.C v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d.833(2d cir. 1968), ”William and Mary Law Review: 1969, vol. 10, issue 3.
• L. Harris, Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners, Oxford University Press 2003.
• P. Huber, Comparative Sales Law [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law.
• A. Kronman, Mistake, Disclosure, Information and the Law of Contracts [in:] Economic Analysis of the Law: Selected Readings, ed. D. Wittman, John Wiley & Sons 2008
• I. Maclean, Interpretation and Meaning in the Renaissance: The Case of Law, Cambidge University Press 1992.
• J.W. Markham, Law Enforcement and the History of Financial Market Manipulation,M.E. Sharpe 2013.
• F. Peters, Der Erwerb des Pfandes durch den Pfandglaubiger im klassischen Und nachklassischen Recht [in:] Studien in Römischen Recht, Berlin 1973.
• A. Powell, J. Paterson, Cicero the Advocate, Oxford University Press 2004.
• M. J. Schermaier [w:] Good Faith in European Contract Law, ed. R. Zimmermann, S. Whittaker, Cambridge University Press 2000.
• R. Sefton-Green, M.J. Schermaier, J. Cartwright, Mistake, Fraud and Duties to Inform in European Contract Law, Cambridge University Press 2005.
• M. Sic, Why the opinion of Papinian preserved by Fragm. Vat 9 was not insertem into Justinian’s Digest?, ”Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Legal Studies” 2012, vol. 1(1).
• The Fall and Rise of Freedom of Contract, red. F.H. Buckley, Duke University Press 1999.
• A.J.B. Sirks, O koncepcji ”iustum Premium” w historycznym zarysie, ”Zeszyty naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Prawo” 2001, no. 12.
• M.J. Trebilcock, The Limits of Freedom of Contracts, Harvard University Press 1997.
• D. Weibel, Aufstieg und `Fall` des alexandrinischer Getreidehändlers, Ausgewählte Informationsprobleme beim Kauf von Cicero bis Savigny [in:] Ins Wasser geworfen und Ozeane durchquert, Festschrift für Knut Wolfgang Nörr, ed. M. Ascheri i inni, Kolonia-Weimar-Wiedeń 2003.
• Ł. Węgrzynowski, Ekwiwalentność świadczeń w umowie wzajemnej, Warszawa 2011.
• W. Wołodkiewicz, L`edictum de pretiis di Diocleziano. Il mito dell`omnipotenza del legislatore [w:] Leges Sapere. Studia i prace dedykowane profesorowi Januszowi Sondlowi, red. W. Uruszczak, P. Święcicka, A. Kremer, Kraków 2008.
• K. Wyrwińska, Kontrakty aleatoryjne w prawie rzymskim a współczesne towarowe instrumenty finansowe (Alaetory contracts in Roman law versus modern commodity contracts), unpublished doctoral thesis (2010) niepublikowana praca doktorska dostępna w Bibliotece Jagiellońskiej.
• G. Virgo, Principles of the Law of Restitution, Oxford University Press 1999.
• R. Zimmermann, The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Juta&Co, Ltd 1990.
• Good Faith in European Contract Law, ed. R. Zimmermann, S. Whittaker, Cambridge University Press 2000.
• L. Zweigert, H. Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law,Clarendon Press 1998.
• Cicero, De officis, 3, XXIII, 57
• Cicero, De officis, 3, XXIII, 58

Identifiers

DOI

10.4467/20844131KS.14.004.2245