Assessing Indonesian college students’ reading stamina in reading different text formats

• Authors: Refanja Rahmatillah , Firman Parlindungan

Abstracts

EN

Reading stamina, a term for someone’s ability to keep reading in one sit, is believed to be affected by the reading formats. Despite the crucial benefit of reading stamina for lifelong reading performance, it has not received much attention in literacy research. This study, thus, aims to find out the effect of reading formats (digital and print) on the reading stamina of college students. 70 Indonesian college students taking an English course were involved in this study. They were divided into two groups. 35 of them were asked to read a novel in digital format and the rest were asked to read a novel in print format for four-time meetings (30 minutes each). Their reading stamina was assessed through a reading behavior observation sheet. The students’ perception about their reading behavior was also collected through a self-reflection questionnaire adapted from Lynch (2018). The data obtained were analyzed quantitatively. The result showed that there was an increase in the students’ reading stamina for digital format from meeting one through meeting four, but a decrease in print format. Additionally, statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the students’ reading stamina between those who read digital and print format (t (68) = 5.013, p < 0.05, d = 1.2). Regarding the students’ perception about their reading behavior, 69.20% of them mentioned that reading in print format was easier than reading digital format. These findings suggest that choosing appropriate reading format is pivotal for college students since abundant reading resources are available nowadays.

Keywords

EN

Digital; print; reading format; reading stamina

• Publisher: Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej. Language and Society Research Committee
• Journal: Language, Discourse & Society
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 65-80

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Refanja Rahmatillah

• Language and Curriculum Development Center, Universitas Teuku Umar, Indonesia

author

Firman Parlindungan

• Communication Department, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Teuku Umar, Indonesia

References

• Akbar, R. S., Taqi, H. A., Dashti, A. A., & Sadeq, T. M. (2015). Does e-reading enhance reading fluency? English Language Teaching, 8(5), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p195
• Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D. (2017). Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043
• Aydemir, Z., Öztürk, E., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). The effect of reading from screen on the 5th grade elementary students’ level of reading comprehension on informative and narrative type of texts. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2272–2276. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.4.1294
• Baron, N. S. (2017). Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717734184
• Boushey, G, & Moser, J. (2017). Interactive CAFÉ menu. The Daily CAFÉ: Two Sisters.
• Boushey, Gail, & Moser, J. (2012). Big ideas behind daily 5 and cafe. Reading Teacher, 66(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01116
• Chen, C. M., & Chen, F. Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers and Education, 77, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.010
• Chen, D. W., & Catrambone, R. (2015). Paper vs. screen: Effects on reading comprehension, metacognition, and reader behavior. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2015-Janua, 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591069
• Clifton, R. (2021). The effects of student choice on reading comprehension and stamina [Master’s thesis]. Goucher College.
• Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers and Education, 62, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016
• Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25(September), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
• DeMaiolo, J. N. (2017). Getting gritty with it : An analysis of grit and reading stamina in first grade students. Miami University.
• Duncan, L. G., Mcgeown, S. P., Griffiths, Y. M., Stothard, S. E., & Dobai, A. (2016). Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension. British Journal of Psychology, 107(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12134
• Evans, E. (2017). Learning From High School Students’ Lived Experiences of Reading E-Books and Printed Books. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 61(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.685
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications.
• Foasberg, N. M. (2014). Student reading practices in print and electronic media. College and Research Libraries, 75(5), 705–723. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.75.5.705
• Glaus, M. (2014). Text Complexity and Young Adult Literature. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57(5), 407–418. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/JA AL.25
• Gulla, A. (2012). Putting the “shop” in reading workshop: Building reading stamina in a ninth-grade literacy class in a Bronx Vocational High School. English Journal, 101(5), 57–62.
• Hiebert, E. H. (2015). The forgotten reading proficiency: Stamina in silent reading. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Teaching stamina and silent reading in the digital-global age (pp. 16–31). TextProject, Inc.
• Hiebert, E. H., Wilson, K. M., & Trainin, G. (2014). Are students really reading in independent reading context? An examination of comprehension-based silent reading rate. In E. H. Hiebert & D. R. Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting Silent Reading: New Directions for Teachers and Researchers (pp. 151–167). TextProject, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1598/0833
• Holschuh, J. P. (2019). College reading and studying: The complexity of academic literacy task demands. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(6), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.876
• Horowitz, L. (2018). The effects of flexible seating on reading stamina in third grade. Caldwell University.
• Kittle, P. (2013). Book love: Developing depth, stamina, and passion in adolescent readers. Heinemann.
• Kualakata. (2014). Diarly La Sorbonne. Gramedia.
• Kurata, K., Ishita, E., Miyata, Y., & Minami, Y. (2017). Print or digital? Reading behavior and preferences in Japan. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 884–894. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23712
• Larson, L. C. (2015). E-books and audiobooks: Extending the digital reading experience. Reading Teacher, 69(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1371
• Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2008). Gender differences in the online reading environment. Journal of Documentation, 64(4), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810884101
• Loh, C. E., & Sun, B. (2019). “I’d Still Prefer to Read the Hard Copy”: Adolescents’ Print and Digital Reading Habits. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.904
• Lynch, M. E. (2018). Filling the reading void: Studying reading stamina in a rural high school through action research: A companion research study. Gardner-Webb University.
• Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). Reading motivation: Exploring the elementary gender gap. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070902803795
• McGeown, S., Goodwin, H., Henderson, N., & Wright, P. (2011). Gender differences in reading motivation: Does sex or gender identity provide a better account? Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01481.x
• Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009
• Pardede, P. (2019). Print vs Digital Reading Comprehension in EFL: A Literature Review. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 5(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v5i2.1062
• Parlindungan, F., Rahmatillah, R., & Lisyati, L. (2021). Academic reading preferences and behaviors of Indonesian undergraduate students during Covid-19 Pandemic. TESOL International Journal, 16(4), 4–27.
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2005). Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (Vol. 18, Issue March). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/231739/1195.pdf
• Rahmat, N. H., Rahman, S. A. S. A., & Hassan, H. R. (2018). Exploring reading issues among millennials and Genz. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 112–125.
• Rosen, L. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the IGeneration and the way they learn. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Sanden, S. (2012). Independent reading: Perspectives and practices of highly effective teachers. Reading Teacher, 66(3), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01120
• Singer Trakhman, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Silverman, A. B. (2018). Profiling reading in print and digital mediums. Learning and Instruction, 57(March), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.001
• Soroya, S. H., & Ameen, K. (2020). Millennials’ Reading Behavior in the Digital Age: A Case Study of Pakistani University Students. Journal of Library Administration, 60(5), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1760563
• Springer, S. E., Wilson, T. J., & Dole, J. A. (2015). Ready or not: Recognizing and preparing college-ready students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 58(4), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.363
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.21.4.1
• Swanson, M. (2013). The effects of choice on young children’s reading engagement and stamina. University of WI – River Falls.
• Trainin, G., Hiebert, E. H., & Wilson, K. M. (2016). A comparison of reading rates, comprehension, and stamina in oral and silent reading of fourth- grade students. Reading Psychology, 36(7), 595–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2014.966183
• Turner, K. H., Hicks, T., & Zucker, L. (2020). Connected Reading: A framework for understanding how adolescents encounter, evaluate, and engage with texts in the digital age. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.271
• Weber, L. (2019). Digital texts and engagement in 2nd grade [University of Wisconsin-River Falls]. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/81408
• Wozniak, C. L. (2010). Reading and the boy crisis: The effect of teacher book talks, interactive read-alouds , and students’ unrestricted choice of books for independent reading on fifth-grade boys’ reading attitude, reading self-efficacy, and amount of reading and fifth-grad. The University of San Francisco.

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki

2196163