PL EN


Journal
2013 | 3 | 112-118
Article title

Komentowanie i oczywistości

Content
Title variants
EN
Commentary and the Obvious
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
PL
The author makes a general statement that writers such as Bruno Schulz, who do not help their audience interpret their texts, require commentary that is potentially boundless. Referring to the tradition of Polish editorship and textual studies, he specifies the list of tasks of the commentator – in this case the commentator of Schulz’s fiction – which includes explaining not only the meaning(s) of particular lexical items or cultural allusions, but also all the potential ambiguities at the level of interpretation. This is why, according to Rosiek, commentary occupies the space between “lexicon and interpretation,” and there are no rules that may help a particular editor find his or her way about there. The most important universal directive it to explain virtually everything since the continuity of culture, connecting different generations is no longer a fact, if it ever was one.
Keywords
Journal
Year
Issue
3
Pages
112-118
Physical description
Dates
published
2013-09-02
Contributors
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2300-5823-year-2013-issue-3-article-2163
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.