Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


System messages
  • Session was invalidated!
  • Session was invalidated!
  • Session was invalidated!
2020 | 1 | 13 | 85-96

Article title

Relationship between locus of control and a teacher's transformative leadership

Authors

Content

Title variants

PL
Zależność między poczuciem umiejscowienia kontroli a przywództwem transformacyjnym nauczyciela

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Tylko minimalną uwagę zwraca się na złożoność i potencjał wiedzy psychologicznej w skuteczności przywództwa w edukacji na Słowacji. Celem artykułu jest analiza powiązań między przywództwem transformacyjnym a osobowością słowackich nauczycieli. Grupa badawcza składała się ze 113 nauczycieli szkół podstawowych i średnich w Republice Słowackiej. Poczucie umiejscowienia kontroli określono za pomocą kwestionariusza Origin/Pawn/Pešiak (De Charms, 1976), a poszczególne typy zachowań lidera transformującego za pomocą Inwentarza zachowań lidera (LPI, Kouzes & Posner, 2017). Zależności między zmiennymi poddano współczynnikowi korelacji Pearsona. Średnie wartości poszczególnych monitorowanych typów zachowania wybranego modelu lidera transformacyjnego były bliższe wartościom poniżej średniej. Korelacje między obserwowanymi typami zachowań a sposobem interpretowania przyczyn zdarzeń były znaczące i pozytywne.
EN
Only minimal attention is paid to the complexity and potential of psychological knowledge of the effectiveness of educational leadership in Slovakia. The aim of this study is to analyze the interrelationships between transformative leadership and personal causality among Slovak teachers. The research group consisted of 113 primary and high school teachers in the Slovak Republic. The level of personal causality was determined using the Origin-Pawn questionnaire (De Charms, 1976) and individual types of a transformative leader’s behavior were determined using the Leader Behavior Inventory (LPI, Kouzes & Posner, 2017). The relationships of the variables were subjected to a Pearson correlation coefficient. The average values of individually monitored types of behavior in the selected model of the transformative leader were closer to below-average values. Most often, our respondents tended to support the heart and enable growth. The correlations between the observed types of behavior and personal causality were significant and positive.

Year

Volume

1

Issue

13

Pages

85-96

Physical description

Dates

published
2020

Contributors

  • Matej Bel University, Banska Bystrica Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education

References

  • De CHARMS, R. 1976. Enhancing motivation: Change in the classroom. New York: Irvington Publishers. 211 p.
  • DION, M. 2012. Are ethical theories relevant for ethical leadership? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, p. 4–24.
  • DOZIER, T. 2007. Turning good teachers into great leaders. In: Teachers as Leaders. Vol. 65, no. 1, p. 54-59.
  • CHEMERS, MM. 2000. “Leadership research and theory: A functional integration,” Group Dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 27–43.
  • JUDGE, TA & BONO, JE. 2000. Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, No. 5, p. 751–765.
  • KAUFMAN, B. 2011. Leadership strategies: build your sphere of influence. Business Strategy Series, Vol. 12, No. 6, p. 315–320.
  • KOUZES, JM & POSNER, BZ. 2017. Leadership Practices Inventory Self; LPI: Leadership Practices Inventory Observer; LPI: Leadership Practices Inventory Workbook. Published by the Leadership Challenge®.
  • LEITHWOOD, K & BEATTY, B. 2008. Leading with teacher emotions in mind. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
  • LIM, BC & PLOYHART, RE. 2004. Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 4, p. 610–621.
  • MILLER, PW. (Ed). 2018. The Nature of School Leadership. Global Practice Perspectives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • NAKONEČNÝ, M. 1996. Motivace lidského chování. Praha: Academia, 1996. 286 s.
  • SOLLÁROVÁ, E. et.al. 2019. Leadership in education characteristics of the key concepts. In Work and organizational psychology 2019. Psychologie práce a organizace 2019 : sborník příspěvků z 18. mezinárodní konference : proceedings of the 18th international conference Brno: Masarykova univerzita v Brně, 2019. p. 198-207.
  • TOMAL, DE, SCHILLING, CA & WILHITE, RK. 2014. The Teacher Leader: Core competencies and strategies for effective leadership. London UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • YUKL, GA. 2008. Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • WEINER, B & KUKLA, A. 1970. An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. In Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 15: 1 – 20.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
1191726

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2353-7426-year-2020-volume-1-issue-13-article-cf32975d-d9e6-3704-857f-78e2d666cb5d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.