PL EN


2016 | 7 | 21 | 55-95
Article title

Russia and Secularization: A Conceptualization of the Field of Research

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the article is to investi­gate the problem of success/failure of the complex process of seculari­zation in Russia in the context of historical developments, especially the Reformation(s), and to propose a new conceptualization of the field of research. Within the scope of investigation, secularization is understood as the process of incessant production of knowledge that leads to progressive differentiation and distinction of various aspects of society on the level of macrostructures. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: There is a need to assess anew the linkage between the Reformation(s) as a prolonged process of questioning of all cultural formations (epis­temes) and the particular historical settings in which they manifested themselves. According to model advanced by Bruno Latour, it can be said that Reformation(s) redefined the procedure of attaining knowl­edge by breaking the logic of procession and instituting the logic of network. Secularization became one of the key modules of reconstitut­ing the knowledge/power relation within different epistemes. Russia has often been perceived as immutable and culturally mute entity “unto itself,” untouched by modernity, separate from the dominant Western episteme. This article presents a cognitivist perspective, based on the model of a double helix. It assumes the legitimacy of different narrations of modernity, which may differ in terms of practices of translation, but are still the active actors of the dynamic process of modern continuity and change, as exemplified by trajectories of Reformation(s). THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: First, the article defines the scope of investigation of secularization as the production of knowledge. Then it assesses where and how the “secular parable,” whose agent was Reformation(s), performed on large discursive fields of modernity – including its problematic relationship with the theory of modernization. Subsequently, the model of a dou­ble helix is presented as a heuristic tool for understanding the way by which the translation of Russia within the framework of modernity has taken place. Alternative models, like Enlightenment, Euroasianism (Gumilev, Dugin) are discussed within the context of the notion of altermodernity, as formulated by Nicolas Bourriaud. Then, the article assesses, in what way secularization in Russia, understood as a “cultural program” (S.N. Eisenstadt) had formed, over centuries, a heterogeneous text, responding to various temporalities. RESEARCH RESULTS: The result is a proposal of a new conceptualization of the field of research as an interdisciplinary reading of mutuality of relations between Russia and secularization as a continuous translation of the structures of thought and knowledge of modernity in the contextual, historically grounded praxis of power/knowledge dynamics. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Taking a cue from Polanyi’s “personal knowledge,” the research has aimed at depicting a new cognitive perspective that seriously takes into consideration the interdisciplinarity of knowledge. Research on secularization and research on Russia tend to form two different spheres of scholarly activities, often weighted down by stereotypes. The stereo­type about secularization is that it refers mainly to decreasing the religious aspect of social life, which development is associated with the emergence of modernity. As for Russia, the stereotype is that it does not participate in modernity at all. The article proposes a more productive way of relating Russia and seculariza­tion as a process of translating dispositifs of modernity in a contextual manner, that takes into consideration political dispositions, cultural traits, institutional practices and discontinuities of social development.    
Keywords
Year
Volume
7
Issue
21
Pages
55-95
Physical description
Dates
published
2017-01-30
Contributors
References
  • Anderson, P. (1979). Lineages of the Absolutist State. London – New York: Verso World History Series.
  • Austin, J.L. ( 1979). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Barnes, R.B. (2016). Astrology and Reformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Barth, K. (2009). Church Dogmatics. London: T&T Clark International.
  • Bierdajew, M. (1999). Rosyjska idea. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Fronda.
  • Bourriaud, N. (2005). Keynote adress to the Art. Association of Australia and New Zeland Conference.
  • Buckler, J.A. (2004). Mapping St. Petersburg: Imperial Text and Cityshape. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Button, R.W. (2015). The Theology of Ritual and the Russian Old Rite: The Art of Christian Living. Exeter: M.A. Thesis in Theology and Religion, University of Exeter. Casanova, J. (2006). Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective. Hedgehog Review: Critical Reflections on Contemporary Culture, Spring & Summer.
  • Chamberlain, L. (2005). Motherland: a Philosophical History of Russia. London: Atlantic Books.
  • Cherniavsky, M. (1966). The Old Believers and the New Religion. Slavic Review, Vol. 25, No. 1.
  • Christensen, C.M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma. Boston MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Churchill, W. (1939). The Russian Enigma, Broadcast, Oct. 1.
  • Csicsery Ronay, I. Jr. (2004). Soviet Science Fiction: The Thaw and After. Science Fiction Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, Nov. 2004.
  • Dugin, A., The Subconscioussness of Eurasia. Retrived from: http://www.eurasianistarchive.com/author/alexander dugin/ chapter-2-the subconsciousness of eurasia mysteries of-
  • Eisenstad, S.N. (2007). Multiple Modernities – A Paradigm of Cultural and Social Evolution, ProtoSociology. An International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 24.
  • Eisenstadt, S.N. (2000). Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, Winter.
  • Florovski, G. (1937). Puti russkogo bogosłowija. Paris.
  • Foucault, M. (1980). “The Confession of the Flesh” (1977) interview, in: Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings (Colin Gordon, edit.). New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things: An Archeology of Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press, Oxford: Basill Blackwell, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Golburt, L. (2014). The First Epoch: The Eighteenth Century and the Russian Cultural Imagination. Wisconsin Center for Pushkin Studies, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Hughes, L. (2004). Secularization and Westernization Revisited: art and architecture in seventeenth century Russia. In: J. Kotilaine, & M. Poe (Eds.), Modernizing Muscovy: Reform and Social Change in Seventeenth Century Russia, Routledge Studies in the History of Russia and Eastern Europe. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
  • Huntington, S.P. (2011). The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of the World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • ---
  • Huntington, S.P. (1999). (Ed.). The Clash of Civilizations? A Debate. New York: Foreign Affairs Books.
  • Huntington, S.P. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations. Foreign Affairs, Summer.
  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Johnson, P. (1976). History of Christianity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Kireevsky, I. (1852). A Letter to Count E.E. Komarovsky “On the Character of the European Enlightenment and its Relationship to the Russian Englightenment”. Retrived from: https://souloftheeast.org/2014/03/12/ the russian enlightenment/
  • Kononen, M. (2003). “Four Ways of Writing the City”: St. Petersburg Leningrad as a Metaphor in the Poetry of Joseph Brodsky. Slavica Helsingiensa. Dept. of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
  • ---
  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • ---
  • Lacan, J. (1978). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (Vol. Book XI) (The Seminar of Jacques Lacan). New York: W.W. Norton Company.
  • Latour, B. (2001). On a Crucial Difference Between Instruments and Angels: A Sermon. RES, No. 79.
  • Lepore, J. (2014). The Disruption Machine. The New Yorker, June 23.
  • MacCulloch, D. (2003). Reformation: Europe’s House Divided 1490-1700. London: Allen Lane.
  • Marciniak, W. (2009). Odrodzenie imperium: obraz, krytyka i polityka, Pressje: Teka XV Klubu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Marshall, P. (2009). The Reformation: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Maryniak, I. (1995). Spirit of the Totem: Religion and Myth in Soviet Fiction, 1964-1988. The Modern Humanities Research Association. Leeds: W.S. Maney & Son, Ltd.
  • McKnight, S.A. (1990). The Legitimacy of Modern Age: The Loewith Blumenberg Debate in Light of Recent Scholarship. Political Science Reviewer, Vol. 19, No. 1.
  • Michels, G. (2000). At War with the Church: Religious dissent in seventeeeth century Russia. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
  • Neumann, I.B. Russia as Europe’s Other, European University Institute and Norvegian Institute of International Affairs, (no date given). Retrived from: https://core.ac.uk/download/files/153/6538476.pdf.
  • Neumann, I.B. (1993). Russia as Central Europe’s Constituting Other. East European Politics & Societies, vol. 7, no. 2.
  • Oksala, J. (2005). Foucault on Freedom. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pfadenhauer, M., With Selected Essays by Berger P.L. (2013). The New Sociology of Knowledge: The Life and Work of Peter L. Berger. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.
  • Polanyi, K. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • ---
  • Putin, V. (2012). President’s Address to the Federal Assembly, Dec. 12. Retrived from: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/17118.
  • Rose, M. (2016). Ethics with Barth: God, Metaphysics and Morals. Abingdon – New York: Routledge.
  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1754). Discourse on the Origins of Inequality.
  • Sergeev, M. (2004). The Project of the Enlightment: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Art. Moscov: Russian Philosophical Society.
  • Shkolnikov, V. (2013) The Crisis of the Beatiful Soul and the Hidden History of Russian Hegelianism. In: L. Herzog (Ed.), Hegel’s Thought in Europe: Currents, Crosscurrent and Undercurrents. New York: Pal-grave Macmillan, 17.
  • Shkolnikov, V. (2003). Imperial Realism: Belinsky and the Wretched of the Earth. Ulbandus Review, Vol. 7, Empire, Union, Center, Satellite: The Place of Post Colonial Theory in Slavic/Central and Eastern Eu-ropean (Post-)Soviet Studies.
  • Sommerville, J.C. (1998). Secular Society/Religious Population: Our Tacit Rules for Using the Term Secularization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37 (2).
  • Staniszkis, J. (2016). Rozpoznawanie nieoczywistości, (Recognizing the Non Evident) Respublika, April 2. Retrived from: http://publica.pl/ teksty/staniszkis rozpoznawanie nieoczywistosci-56270.html
  • Świder, K. (2015). Rosyjska świadomość geopolityczna a Ukraina i Białoruś (po rozpadzie Związku Radzieckiego). Warszawa: ISP PAN.
  • Wallace, P.G. (2012). The Long European Reformation: Religion, Political Conflict and the Search for Conformity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wortman, R.S. (2006). Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy from Peter the Great to the Abdication of Nicolas II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • ---
  • Zenkovsky, S.A. (1957). The Russian Church Schism: Its Background and Repercussions. The Russian Review, Vol. 16, No. 4.
  • Zhigankov, O. (2000). Ahead of their time? The 15th century Reformation in Russia. Retrived from: http://dialogue.adventist.org/12-3/zhigankov/ ahead of their time the-15th century reformation in russia.
  • ---
  • Ziernow, N. (2015). Rosyjskie odrodzenie religijne XX wieku. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2353-950X-year-2016-volume-7-issue-21-article-868
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.