PL EN


2018 | 9 | 29 | 99-111
Article title

Legitimation and the construction of social order

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Research objective: The aim of the article is to analyse selected sociological theories of legitimation. The research objective is to provide an answer to the question about the meanings and functions of legitimation in the process of the discursive construction of social order. The research problems and methods: Legitimation is analysed in the text both as a concept describing a specific state of social reality (static approach) and as a discursive strategy in which language plays a dominant role (dynamic approach). The main research method used in the text is a content analysis of selected sociological concepts of legitimation. The process of argumentation: The first part presents the meaning of legitimation in a static approach, which depends on the theoretical paradigm used. The second part presents an analysis of the interactionist-phenomenological concept of legitimation, which reveals its basic function as an element within the construction of social order. In the third part, legitimation is analyzed in a dynamic approach, as a discursive strategy that can significantly complement the diverse conglomerate of discourse theory. The conclusion emphasizes the role of legitimation in a situation of uncertainty and social crises. Research results: The study of the process of legitimation as an element responsible for the stability of the constructed social order is important especially in situations of community crisis, The most appropriate area for testing legitimation is discourse, and the research material would include articulations, meanings and language. Conclusions, innovations, and recommendations: Deepening the meaning of legitimation in sociological theories can contribute to their easier and fuller use in the study of specific research materials. This can contribute not only to a better understanding of sociological theories, but also deepen knowledge about the mechanisms that govern society.
Year
Volume
9
Issue
29
Pages
99-111
Physical description
Dates
published
2019-05-06
Contributors
References
  • Beetham, D. 2001. The Legitimation of Power. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Berger, P.L. 1969. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Achor Books.
  • Blau, P.M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
  • Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant L.J.D. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dornbusch, S.M. & Scott, W.R. 1975. Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Doudaki, V. 2015. Legitimation mechanisms in the bailout discourse. Javost-The Public, 22: 1-17.
  • Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
  • Gaus, D. 2011. The dynamics of legitimation. Why the study of political legitimacy needs more realism. Arena Working Paper, 8, 1-23.
  • Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Johnson, C. 2004. Legitimacy processes in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 22: 1-24.
  • Johnson, C., Dowd, T.J. & Ridgeway, C.L. 2006. Legitimacy as social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32: 53-78.
  • Jørgensen, M. & Phillips, L. 2002. Discourse Analysis As Theory and Method. London: Sage.
  • Luckmann, T. 1987. Comments on legitimation. Current Sociology, 35: 109-117.
  • Martin-Rojo, L. & Van Dijk, T. 1997. “There was a Problem, and it was Solved!”: Legitimating the Expulsion of `Illegal' Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse. Discourse & Society, 8: 523-566.
  • Suchman, M.C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-610.
  • Tyler, T.R. 2006. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57: 375-400.
  • Vaara, E. & Tienari, J. 2008. A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33: 985-993.
  • Van Leeuwen, T. & Wodak, R. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: a discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1: 83-118.
  • Van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Walker, H.A. & Zelditch, M. 1993. Power, Legitimation, and the stability of authority: a theoretical research program. In: J. Berger & M. Zelditch (eds). Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Weber, M. 2004. The Vocation Lectures. Illinois: Hackett Books.
  • Zelditch, M. 2001. Theories of Legitimacy. In: J. Jost & B. Major (eds). The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2353-950X-year-2018-volume-9-issue-29-article-1720
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.