PL EN


2019 | 10 | 32 | 87-104
Article title

Historical determinants of the British separateness in the context of Brexit

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article aims at identifying, discussing and and evaluating historical determinants of the British/English separateness.  RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Brexit is the sign of disintegration tendencies within the EU. Wide literature studies indicated a research gap regarding the historical determinants of the British/English separateness. The research was conducted with the application of the research methods: literature studies, critical thinking, inductive and deductive reasoning, nomothetic analysis.  THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The line of reasoning consists of three essential elements. At first, Brexit literature review was conducted. The next part focuses on the dynamics of the process of Brexit. The final part concentrates on the analysis of historical economic and political sources of separateness of England / Great Britain. RESEARCH RESULTS: The conducted research made it possible to prove hypothesis according to which Brexit is yet another example of separateness of Great Britain, while separateness of Great Britain results from numerous historical determinants and – on the other hand – history of Great Britain brings numerus reasons for and indications of its separateness.   CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMEDATIONS: The specific path of England to the position of world leader has left its mark not only on social relations, but also on the mentality of the English. It confirmed their belief in the uniqueness and difference as compared to other nations, which in turn nourished the tradition and traditional way of life, especially in older generations. The above stated regularity has been confirmed by the referendum on leaving the EU. The obtained research results suggest that the British separateness and its historical determinants should be considered as essential factor in the process of post-Brexit relations between the EU and the UK – both in regard to political aspects  and practical issues.
Keywords
Year
Volume
10
Issue
32
Pages
87-104
Physical description
Dates
published
2019-10-29
Contributors
References
  • Alabrese, E., Becker, S.O., Fetzer, T., Novy, D. (2019). Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 56, January 2019, pp. 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.08.002.
  • Aristeidis, S., Elias, K. (2018). Empirical analysis of market reactions to the UK’s referendum results – How strong will Brexit be? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Volume 53, March 2018, pp. 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.003.
  • Arnorssona, A., Zoega, G. (2018). On the causes of Brexit, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 55, December 2018, pp. 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.02.001.
  • Babonneau, F., Haurie, A. (2018). Marc Vielle, Welfare implications of EU Effort Sharing Decision and possible impact of a hard Brexit, Energy Economics, Vol. 74, August 2018, pp. 470-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.024.
  • Bachmann, V., Sidaway, J.D. (2016). Brexit geopolitics, Geoforum, Volume 77, December 2016, pp. 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.001.
  • Bidwell, G. (1985). Rubaszny król Hal, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Śląsk.
  • Black, J. (1997), Europa XVIII wieku. 1700-1789, Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
  • Breeze, R. (2018). ‘Enemies of the people’: Populist performances in the Daily Mail reporting of the Article 50 case, Discourse, Context & Media, Vol. 25, October 2018, Pages 60-
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.008.
  • Callen, J., Takamasa, A., Toma, H. (2019). Insights to the UK's impending departure from Euratom: Case study of UK nuclear safeguards and radiation protection in light of Brexit, Energy Policy, Vol. 129, June 2019, pp. 1416-1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.074.
  • Cameron, R., Neal, L. (2014). Historia gospodarcza świata. Od paleolitu do czasów najnowszych, Poznań: Książka i Wiedza.
  • CER (2014). The economic consequences of leaving the EU. The final report of the CER commission on the UK and the EU single market. London: Centre for European Reform, 96 pp.
  • Cooper, C.L. (2016). What can business leaders and managers learn from what political leaders did during the Brexit campaign in the UK: A personal view, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 45, Issue 4, October–December 2016, pp. 313-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.10.007.
  • Daoa, T.M., McGroarty, F., Urquhart, A. (2019). The Brexit vote and currency markets, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 59, March 2019, pp. 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.11.004.
  • Davies, R.B., Studnicka, Z. (2018). The heterogeneous impact of Brexit: Early indications from the FTSE, European Economic Review, Vol. 110, November 2018, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.08.003.
  • Ferguson, N. (2007), Imperium. Jak Wielka Brytania zbudowała nowoczesny świat, Warszawa: Sprawy polityczne.
  • Fleming, N. (2018). Brexit batters science job market, New Scientist, Vol. 237, Issue 3172, 7 April 2018, Page 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(18)30622-5.
  • Frysztacki K., Radwan-Prąglowski J. (1996). Społeczne dzieje pomocy człowiekowi: od filantropii greckiej do pracy socjalnej, Warszawa: Śląsk.
  • Galbraith, J. K.(1991), Ekonomia w perspektywie. Krytyka historyczna, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  • Głąbicka, K. (2001), Polityka społeczna w Unii Europejskiej. Aspekty aksjologiczne i empiryczne, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej TWP.
  • Gray, S. (2017). Fuelling mobility: coal and Britain's naval power, c. 1870–1914. Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 58, October 2017, pp. 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2017.06.013.
  • Hallett, A.H. (2019) Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: Brexit and the economics of disengaging from a free trade association, Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 62, June 2019, pp. 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.01.004.
  • Henökl, T. (2018). How Brexit affects EU external action: The UK’s legacy in European international cooperation, Futures, Vol. 97, March 2018, pp. 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.07.002.
  • HM Government (2016). Alternatives to membership: possible models for the United Kingdom outside the European Union. London, 54 pp.
  • Jackson, K., Shepotylo, O. (2018). Post-Brexit trade survival: Looking beyond the European Union. Economic Modelling, Vol. 73, June 2018, pp. 317-32. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2018.04.010.
  • Kaliński, J. (2008). Historia gospodarcza XIX i XX wieku, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  • Lavery, S., McDaniel, S., Schmid, D. (2018). New geographies of European financial competition? Frankfurt, Paris and the political economy of Brexit, Geoforum, Vol. 94, August 2018, pp. 72-81.
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.03.021.
  • Le Page, M. (2016). Brexit doesn't have to doom the environment, New Scientist, Vol. 231, Issue 3081, 9 July 2016, Page 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(16)31234-9.
  • Lee, A., Paine, J. (2019). British colonialism and democracy: Divergent inheritances and diminishing legacies. Journal of Comparative Economics. Available online 8 February 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2019.02.001.
  • Li, H. (2019). Volatility spillovers across European stock markets under the uncertainty of Brexit, Economic Modelling, Available online 7 March 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.03.001.
  • Liberinia, F., Oswald, A.J., Proto, E., Redoano, M. (2019). Was Brexit triggered by the old and unhappy? Or by financial feelings? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 161, May 2019, pp. 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.03.024.
  • Małowist, M. (2006), Wschód a Zachód Europy w XIII-XVI wieku. Konfrontacja struktur społeczno-gospodarczych, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Mączak, A. (1967), U źródeł nowoczesnej gospodarki europejskiej, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Mold, A. (2018). The consequences of Brexit for Africa: The case of the East African Community, Journal of African Trade, Vol. 5, Issues 1–2, December 2018, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2018.10.001.
  • Oehler, A., Horn, M., Wendt, S. (2017). Brexit: Short-term stock price effects and the impact of firm-level internationalization, Finance Research Letters, Volume 22, August 2017, pp. 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.12.024.
  • Parkes, R. (2016). Brexit: A storm in a teacup? Renewable Energy Focus, Vol. 17, Issue 5, September–October 2016, pp. 188-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2016.08.012.
  • Author 1. (2016).
  • Author 1. (2017).
  • Plakandaras, V., Gupta, R., Wohar, M.A. (2017). The depreciation of the pound post-Brexit: Could it have been predicted? Finance Research Letters, Vol. 21, May 2017, pp. 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.12.003.
  • Samitas, A., Polyzos, S., Siriopoulos, C. (2018). Brexit and financial stability: An agent-based simulation, Economic Modelling, Vol. 69, January 2018, pp. 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.09.019.
  • Schiereck, D., Kiesel, F., Kolaric, S. (2016). Brexit: (Not) another Lehman moment for banks? Finance Research Letters, Volume 19, November 2016, pp. 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.09.003.
  • Sekeris, P. (2019). Guaranteed uncertainty. New Scientist, Vol. 242, Issue 3224, 6 April 2019, pp. 24-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(19)30598-6.
  • Sharf, E. (2016). Information exchanges: regulatory changes to the cyber-security industry after Brexit: Making security awareness training work, Computer Fraud & Security, Vol. 2016, Issue 7, July 2016, pp. 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(16)30052-5.
  • Shaw, D., Smith, Ch.M., Scully, J. (2017). Why did Brexit happen? Using causal mapping to analyse secondary, longitudinal data, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 263, Issue 3, 16 December 2017, pp. 1019-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.051.
  • Skodlarski, J. (2014). Historia gospodarcza, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Skrzydło, W., Orłowski W. (2007) Ustrój polityczny Wielkiej Brytanii. (in: ) Skrzydło. W.,: Ustroje państw współczesnych. Wyd. 4. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
  • Szpak, J. (2003). Historia gospodarcza powszechna, Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  • Spiegel, H. W. (1971). The growth of economic thought, Prentice -Hall. Inc., New Jersey.
  • Steinberg, J.B. (2019). Brexit and the macroeconomic impact of trade policy uncertainty, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 117, March 2019, pp. 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.01.009.
  • UK Parliament (2019). What's next for Brexit? No Commons majority in indicative votes. https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2019/march/whats-next-for-brexit-house-of-commons-holds-indicative-votes/. Available online 27 March 2019.
  • Wickham, Ch. (2018), Średniowieczna Europa, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo RM.
  • Winkel, G., Derks, J. (2016). The nature of Brexit. How the UK exiting the European Union could affect European forest and (forest related) environmental policy, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 70, September 2016, pp. 124-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.007
  • Wojnarski, D. (2004). Powszechna historia gospodarcza, Warszawa: Poltext.
  • Zagóra-Jonszta, U. (2000), Wpływ reformacji na rozwój merkantylizmu, Studia Ekonomiczne No. 11, Katowice.
  • Zins, H. (2001), Historia Anglii, Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
  • Zaromb, F.M., Liu, J.H., Paez, D., Hanke, K., Putnam, A.L., Roediger III, H.L. (2018). We Made History: Citizens of 35 Countries Overestimate Their Nation's Role in World History. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vol. 7, Issue 4, December 2018, pp. 521-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.05.006.
  • Ziv, G., Watson, E., Young, D., Howard, D.C., Tanentzap, A.J. (2018). The potential impact of Brexit on the energy, water and food nexus in the UK: A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach, “Applied Energy”, Volume 210, 15 January 2018, pp. 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.033.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2353-950X-year-2019-volume-10-issue-32-article-1801
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.