Niespójność Pawłowego wywodu w Rz 2,1-29? Odpowiedź na tezę Eda Parisha Sandersa

• Authors: Waldemar Rakocy

Title variants

EN

Lack of Coherence in Paul’s Exposition in Rom 2:1-29? A Critical Assessment of Ed Parish Sanders’s Hypothesis

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

In reply to Ed P. Sanders’s thesis we state that Romans 2 does not show inconsistencies within itself, neither with the immediate context, nor with other places in the Epistle. We prove it mainly by analyzing formal subjects in the text. Inconsistencies in Romans 2 were the main reason leading Sanders to the conclusion that chapter 2 derives from the homiletical material of Diaspora Judaism (a synagogue sermon). We don’t rule out this possibility altogether but we point out that his arguments supporting the hypothesis are not sufficient and require additional proofs.

Keywords

PL

Rz 2; powszechna grzeszność; usprawiedliwienie

EN

Romans 2; universal sinfulness; justifi

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: The Biblical Annals
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 195-216

Dates

published

2015-11-07

Contributors

author

Waldemar Rakocy

• Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Wydział Teologii. Instytut Nauk Biblijnych.