Łukasiewicz and Quine on Empirical and A Priori Sciences

• Authors: Zuzana Rybaříková
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Although Łukasiewicz and Quine do not share many common views, they agreed on one important point in the 1950s: they both denied the distinction between empirical and a priori sciences. This agreement might be surprising as this denial was rather controversial at that time. This paper focuses on Quine’s and Łukasiewicz’s denials of the distinction between empirical and a priori sciences, and proposes three possible answers to the question of why both formulated the same conclusion at a similar time. Firstly, it discusses Quine’s possible influence on Łukasiewicz as Łukasiewicz agreed with Quine’s criticism of modality at that time. Secondly, it considers the possibility that Quine was affected by Łukasiewicz via his debates with Łukasiewicz’s student, Tarski. Lastly, it takes into account the possibility that both philosophers were inspired by an external source, namely the rise of quantum mechanics.

Keywords

PL

W. V. O. Quine; Jan Łukasiewicz; analytic-synthetic distinction; reductionism; holism; four-valued logic; a priori sciences; empirical sciences

• Publisher: Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne
• Journal: Studia Semiotyczne
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 33
• Issue: 2

Dates

published

2020-01-23

Contributors

author

Zuzana Rybaříková