Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2001 | 3 |

Article title

Gatunki pierwotne i wtórne w perspektywie historycznej i współczesnej

Content

Title variants

EN
Primary and Secondary Genres in Two Perspectives: an Historical One and a Contemporary One

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Aleksander Wilkoń Primary and Secondary Genres in Two Perspectives: an Historical One and a Contemporary One Aleksander Wilkon's essay challenges some of Mikhail Bakhtin's conceptions which have been taken for granted in textual linguistics and genology. Wilkon is particularly critical of those generalisa­tions which ignore the categories of the individual, the non-systemic and the inimitable Regardless of their inspirations, the generalisations have tended to lead to simplifications and schematism. In the second section of his essay Wilkon questions Bakhtin's division into primary and secondary genres, which comes down to a distinction between utilitarian genres (both spoken and written) and their literary transformations and mutations. Wilkon argues that Bakhtin's overlooks the influence of sec­ondary genres on those genres which function as primary ones and at the same time derive from literary forms. In the final section of the essay its author identifies secondary genres within spoken forms of language, which include magic speech, the speech of play and customs and folk art speech.
EN
Aleksander Wilkoń Primary and Secondary Genres in Two Perspectives: an Historical One and a Contemporary One Aleksander Wilkon's essay challenges some of Mikhail Bakhtin's conceptions which have been taken for granted in textual linguistics and genology. Wilkon is particularly critical of those generalisa­tions which ignore the categories of the individual, the non-systemic and the inimitable Regardless of their inspirations, the generalisations have tended to lead to simplifications and schematism. In the second section of his essay Wilkon questions Bakhtin's division into primary and secondary genres, which comes down to a distinction between utilitarian genres (both spoken and written) and their literary transformations and mutations. Wilkon argues that Bakhtin's overlooks the influence of sec­ondary genres on those genres which function as primary ones and at the same time derive from literary forms. In the final section of the essay its author identifies secondary genres within spoken forms of language, which include magic speech, the speech of play and customs and folk art speech.

Keywords

Contributors

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2544-3186-year-2001-issue-3-article-2088
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.