Wnioskowanie parametryczne i nieparametryczne w tablicach dwudzielczych i trójdzielczych

• Authors: Sulewski Piotr

Title variants

Nonparametric Versus Parametric Reasoning Based on Contingency Tables

• Languages of publication: PL

Keywords

wnioskowanie statystyczne; funkcja największej wiarygod-ności; tablice kontyngencji; test parametryczny; parametr przepływu prawdopo-dobieństwa

• Publisher: Główny Urząd Statystyczny
• Journal: Przegląd Statystyczny
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 65
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 314-349

Contributors

author

Sulewski Piotr

• The Pomeranian University, Institute of Mathematics

References

• Agresti A., (2002), Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley, New Jersey.
• Allison P. D., Liker J. K., (1982), Analyzing Sequential Categorical Data on Dyadic Interaction: A Comment on Gottman.
• Beh E. J., Davy P. J., (1998), Partitioning Pearson's Chi-squared Statistics for a Completely Ordered Three-Way Contingency Table, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 40, 465–477.
• Bishop Y., Fienberg S., Holland, P., (1975), Discrete Multivariate Analysis – Theory and Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Blitzstein J., Diaconis P., (2011), A Sequential Importance Sampling Algorithm for Generating Random Graphs with Prescribed Degrees, Internet mathematics, 6 (4), 489–522.
• Bock H. H., (2003), Two-Way Clustering for Contingency Tables: Maximizing A Dependence Measure, Between data science and applied data analysis, 143–154.
• Chen Y., Diaconis P., Holmes S. P., Liu J.S., (2005), Sequential Monte Carlo Methods for Statistical Analysis of Tables, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100 (469), 109–120.
• Chen Y., Dinwoodie I. H., Sullivant S., (2006), Sequential Importance Sampling for Multiway Tables, The Annals of Statistics, 523–545.
• Cressie N., Read T. R., (1984), Multinomial Goodness-Of-Fit Tests, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 440–464.
• Cryan M., Dyer M., (2003), A Polynomial-Time Algorithm to Approximately Count Contingency Tables When the Number of Rows Is Constant, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 67 (2), 291–310.
• Cryan M., Dyer M., Goldberg L. A., Jerrum M., Martin R., (2006), Rapidly Mixing Markov Chains for Sampling Contingency Tables with A Constant Number of Rows, SIAM Journal on Computing, 36 (1), 247–278.
• Cung, B., (2013), Crime and Demographics: An Analysis of LAPD Crime Data.
• DeSalvo S., Zhao J. Y., (2015), Random Sampling of Contingency Tables Via Probabilistic Divide- And-Conquer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.00070.
• Diaconis P., Sturmfels B., (1998), Algebraic Algorithms for Sampling from Conditional Distributions, The Annals of statistics, 26 (1), 363–397.
• Dickhaus T., Straßburger K., Schunk D., Morcillo-Suarez C., Illig T., Navarro A., (2012), How to Analyze Many Contingency Tables Simultaneously in Genetic Association Studies, Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 11 (4),12.
• El Galta R., Stijnen T., Houwing-Duistermaat J. J., (2008), Testing for Genetic Association: A Powerful Score Test, Statistics in Medicine, 27 (22), 4596–4609.
• Fishman G. S., (2012), Counting Contingency Tables Via Multistage Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 21(3), 713–738.
• Freeman M. F., Tukey J. W., (1950), Transformations Related to the Angular and the Square Root, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21, 607–611.
• Gokhale D., Kullback S., (1978), The Information in Contingency Tables, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
• Goodman L., Kruskal W., (1954), Measures of Association for Cross Classifications, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764.
• Gray L. N., Williams J. S., (1975), Goodman and Kruskal’s Tau b: Multiple and Partial Analogs, In: Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 444–448.
• Haas P. J., Hueske F., Markl V., (2007), Detecting Attribute Dependencies from Query Feedback, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB Endowment, 830–841.
• Harshman R. A., (1970), Foundations of the PARAFAC Procedure: Models and Conditions for an Explanatory Multi-modal Factor Analysis, UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 16, 1–84.
• Ilyas I. F., Markl V., Haas P., Brown P., Aboulnaga A., (2004), CORDS: Automatic Discovery of Correlations and Soft Functional Dependencies, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, ACM, 647–658.
• Iossifova R., Marmolejo-Ramos F., (2013), When The Body Is Time: Spatial and Temporal Deixis in Children with Visual Impairments and Sighted Children, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (7), 2173–2184.
• Kaski S., Nikkila J., Sinkkonen J., Lahti L., Knuuttila J. E., Roos C., (2005), Associative Clustering for Exploring Dependencies Between Functional Genomics Data Sets, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB), 2 (3), 203–216.
• Kullback S., (1959), Information Theory and Statistics, Wiley, New York.
• Lombardo R., (2011), Three-Way Association Measure Decompositions: The Delta index, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141, 1789–1799.
• Lombardo R., Beh E. J., (2010), Simple and Multiple Correspondence Analysis for Ordinal-Scale Variables Using Orthogonal Polynomials, Journal of Applied Statistics, 37 (12), 2101–2116.
• Marcotorchino F., (1984), Utilisation des Comparaisons par Pairesen Statistique des Contingences. Partie (I), Etude IBM F069, France.
• Neyman J., (1949), Contribution to the Theory of the x2 Test, Proceedings of the First Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Univ. of Calif. Press, 239–273.
• Oates T., Cohen P. R., (1996), Searching for Structure in Multiple Streams of Data, ICML 96.
• Pardo M. C., (1996), An Empirical Investigation of Cressie and Read Tests for the Hypothesis of Independence in Three-way Contingency Tables, Kybernetika 32 (2), 175–183.
• Pearson K., (1900), On the Criterion That a Given System of Deviations From the Probable in the Case of a Correlated System of Variables is Such That it Can be Reasonably Supposed to Have Arisen From Random Sampling, Philosophy Magazine Series, 50, 157–172.
• Schrepp M., (2003), A Method for The Analysis of Hierarchical Dependencies Between Items of a Questionnaire, Methods of Psychological Research Online, 19, 43–79.
• Sokal R. R., Rohlf F. J., (2012), Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, Freeman, New York.
• Steinle M., Aberer. K, Girdzijauskas S., Lovis C., (2006), Mapping Moving Landscapes by Mining Mountains of Logs: Novel Techniques for Dependency Model Generation, Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on Very large data bases, VLDB Endowment, 1093–1102.
• Sulewski P., (2009), Two-By-Two Contingency Table as a Goodness-Of-Fit Test, Computational Methods in Science and Technology, 15 (2), 203–211.
• Sulewski P., (2013), Modyfikacja testu niezależności, Wiadomości Statystyczne, 10, 1–19.
• Sulewski P., (2016), Moc testów niezależności w tablicy dwudzielczej większej niż 2x2, Przegląd Statystyczny, 63 (2), 191–209.
• Sulewski P., (2018a), Power Analysis of Independence Testing for the Three-way Contingency Tables of Small Sizes, Journal of Applied Statistics, 45 (13), 2481–2498.
• Sulewski P., (2018b), Nonparametric Versus Parametric Reasoning Based on 2×2 Contingency Tables, Computational Methods in Science and Technology, 24 (2), 143–153.
• Sulewski P., Motyka R., (2015), Power Analysis of Independence Testing for Contingency Tables. Scientific Journal of Polish Naval Academy, 56, 37–46.
• Tucker L. R., (1963), Implications of Factor Analysis of Three-Way Matrices for Measurement of Change. In Problems in Measuring Change, 122–137.
• Van Belle G., Fisher L.D., Heagerty P. J., Lumley T., (2004), Categorical Data: Contingency Tables, John Wiley & Sons.
• Yoshida R., Xi J., Wei S., Zhou F., Haws D., (2011), Semigroups and Sequential Importance Sampling for Multiway Tables. arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.6518.

Identifiers

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0014.0543