ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS AT SAUDI ARABIA’S INDUSTRIAL COLLEGES TOWARD COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING (CALL)

• Authors: Sultan A. M. Arishi
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper identified attitudes toward CALL of students studying English as a foreign language (EFL) at industrial colleges in Saudi Arabia. Seventy students who were enrolled in the orientation year of an English program were chosen to participate in this study by expressing their attitudes toward CALL. Standardized and local instruments were used along with interviews and observation techniques to collect data. The results of the study revealed that students had positive attitudes toward CALL. Looking at the daily hours students spend using a computer, a slight correlation was found between this variable and the students’ attitudes toward CALL. Other variables, such as students’ background knowledge of English, ownership of a computer, and their computer knowledge, were found to be irrelevant to their attitudes toward CALL. These results were in line with previous research conducted by Al-Shammari (2007), Alrumaih (2004), and Almekhlafi (2006). The results reinforced conclusions about CALL revealed by researchers, such as Chen (2003), Chikamatsu (2003), Egbert (2005) and Levy (2005), who found that it helps students learn better and more independently, and gives them the ability to have more control of their learning and to have more opportunities to practice English.

Keywords

EN

CALL; student attitudes; Saudi Arabia

• Publisher: IATEFL Poland Computer Special Interest Group & University of Nicosia
• Journal: Teaching English with Technology
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 38-52

Contributors

author

Sultan A. M. Arishi

• Jubail Industrial College, Jubail Industrial City, Saudi Arabia

References

• Abalhassan, K. M. (2002). English as a Foreign Language Instruction with CALL Multimedia at a Saudi Arabian Private School: A Multi-Case and Multi-Site Study of CALL Instructors’ Pedagogies and Beliefs. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations Abstracts International (4086).
• Ahmad, K., Corbett, G., Rogers, M., and Sussex, R. (1985) Computers, Language Learning and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Al-Kahtani, S. A. (2001). Computer-Assisted Language Learning in EFL Instruction at Selected Saudi Arabian Universities: Profiles of Faculty. (Doctoral dissertation).Retrieved from Dissertations Abstract International. (2994).
• Al-Khaldi, M., & Al-Jabri, I. (1998). The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: New evidence from a developing nation. Computers in Human Behaviors, 17(4), 23-42.
• Almekhlafi, A. G. (2001). Instructional media for teachers' preparation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(2), 191-207.
• Almekhlafi, A. G. (2006). The effect of computer assisted language learning (CALL) on United Arab Emirates English as a foreign language (EFL) school student’s achievement and attitudes. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 121-142.
• Alrumaih, A. A. (2004). Multimedia Instructional Applications for Pronunciation Instructions in English as a Foreign Language Setting in Saudi Arabia: A Study of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Pedagogies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Kansas.
• Al-Shammari, M. H. (2007). Saudi English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Attitudes toward Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
• Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes toward the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 241-249.
• Bax, S. (2003). CALL past, present and future. System, 31, 13-28.
• Bayraktar, S. (2002). A meta-analysis of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173-188.
• Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language and Learning Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
• Charischak, I. (2000). A look at technology's role in professional development of mathematics teachers at the middle school level. School Science and Mathematics, 100(7), 349-354.
• Chen, J. F. (1996). CALL is not a hammer and not every teaching problem is a nail: Changing expectations of computers in the classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 2(7), 1-4.
• Chen, P. (2003). EFL Student Learning Style Preferences and Attitudes Toward Technology-Integrated Instruction. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations Abstracts International, (2813).
• Chikamatsu, N. (2003). The effects of computer use on L2 Japanese writing. Foreign Language Annals, 36(1), 114-127.
• Cubillos, J. H. (1998). Technology: A step forward in the teaching of foreign languages? In J. Harper, M. Lively, & M. Williams (Eds.), The Coming of Age of the Profession: Issues and Emerging Ideas for the Teaching of Foreign Languages (pp. 199-223). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
• Cushion, S., & Hemard, D. (2002). Applying new technological developments to CALL for Arabic. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 501-508.
• Egbert, J. (Ed.). (2010). CALL in Limited Technology Contexts. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
• Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning and Technology, 6(3), 108-126.
• Egbert. J. (2005). CALL Essentials: Principles and Practice in CALL Classrooms. Virginia: TESOL.
• Fenfang, H. (2003). Learners' behaviors in computer-based input activities elicited through tracking technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 5-29.
• Fotos, S., & Browne, C. (2004). The development of CALL and current options. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms (pp. 3-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the Behavior Sciences (8th ed.). CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
• Frommer, J. G. (1998). Cognition, context, and computers: Factors in effective foreign language teaching. In J. A. Muyskens (Ed.), New Ways of Learning and Teaching: Focus on Technology and Foreign Language Education. AAUSC Issues in Language Program Direction. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
• Jabir, M., & Omar, A. (2002). Students’ and teachers’ attitudes toward computers in the schools in southern governorates of Jordan. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 27(2), 312-327.
• Jung, U. O. (2002). An international bibliography of computer-assisted language learning: Fifth installment. System, 30(3), 349-398.
• Kitao, K. (1993). America ni okeru eigo CAI no doko [Trends in English CAI in the United States]. LL Tsushin [LL Communications], 174, 14-17.
• Kitao, K. (1994). CAI kyoshitsu to computer no gaikokugo kyoiku ni okeru riyo keitai (1-2) [CAI classrooms and ways to use computers in foreign language instruction]. LL Tsushin [LL Communications], 177-178, 8-11, 12-15.
• Lee, K. W. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(12). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html.
• Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
• Levy, M. (1997). Computer-Assisted Language Learning, Context and Conceptualization. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
• Levy, M. (2005). Why call CALL “CALL”?. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 143-149.
• Lin, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching (9th ed.). New York: Pearson.
• Lin, N. T. (2002). Motivation and Attitude toward Integrated Instruction through Technology in College-Level EFL Reading and Writing in Taiwan. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 2002). Dissertation Abstract International, 64/01, 59.
• Loyd, B.H., & Gressard, C. (1984a). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44(2), 501-505.
• Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1984b). The effect of sex, age, and computer experience on computer attitudes. AEDS Journal, 18(2), 67-77.
• Min, B. (1998). A Study of the Attitudes of Korean Adults toward Technology-Assisted Instruction in English-Language Programs (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59/05-A, 1430.
• Nesselhauf, N., & Tschichold, C. (2002). Collocations in CALL: An investigation of vocabulary-building software for EFL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15(3), 251-279.
• Palaigeorgiou, G. E., Siozos, P. D., Konstantakis, N.I., & Tsoukalas, I.A. (2005). A computer attitude scale for computer science freshmen and its educational implications. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 330-342.
• Pennington, M. (2004). Electric media in second language writing: An overview of tools and research findings. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.). New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms (pp. 69-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Purushotma, R. (2005). Commentary: You’re not studying, you are just…. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 80-96.
• Robert, A. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 241-249.
• Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Why virtual, why environments? Implementing virtual reality concepts in computer assisted language learning. Simulation & Gaming, 33(2), 196-209.
• Selwyn, N. (1999). Students’ attitudes toward computers in sixteen to nineteen education. Education and Information Technologies, 4, 129-141.
• Snowman, J. & Biehler, R. (2006). Psychology Applied to Teaching (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
• Son, J. B. (2002). Computers, learners and teachers: Teamwork in the CALL classroom. English Language Teaching, 14(2), 239-252.
• Stevens, V. (1991). A study of student attitudes toward CALL in a self-access student resource centre. System, 19(3), 289-299.
• Vrtacnik, M., Sajovec, M., Dolnicar, D., Pucko, C., Glazar, A., & Brouwer, N. (2000). An interactive multimedia tutorial teaching unit and its effects on student perception and understanding of chemical concepts. Westminster Studies in Education, 23, 91-105.
• Walker, B. (1994). EFL teachers’ attitudes about CALL. CALL Journal, 5(3), 12-15.
• Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
• Wiązowski, J. (1998). Computer assisted language learning in the class of blind and visually impaired students, in Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B. (Ed.), Perspectives on Foreign Language Teaching. Piotrków Trybunalski: WSP.
• Yushau, B. (2006). The effect of blended e-learning on mathematics and computer attitudes in pre-calculus algebra. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 3(2), 176-183.