Polish model of judicial review of decisions taken by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection

• Authors: MADEJ Beata Agnieszka
• Conference: "Judicial review of the decision of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The research effort in the aspect of a model of a court control of a decision issued by the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection is predominantly supported by significance and importance of applicable legal solutions in practice. The research was aimed at evaluating the model of court control of decisions of the OCCP President.

Keywords

EN

the hybridprocedure; the formal control; civil cases in the formal sense; the adversarial principle; legality; criteria of purposefulness and thrift

• Publisher: Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics (CEEJME)
• Year: 2017
• Issue: No. 2
• Pages: 101-114

Dates

online

2017-06-30

Contributors

author

MADEJ Beata Agnieszka

• University of Wrocław

References

• Adamiak B., Borkowski J. (2014), Administrative proceedings in front of the President of the Office and proceedings taken in the Office, in: Private law system. Competition law, vol. 15, ed. Kępiński M, C.H. Beck, Warsaw.
• Błaszczak Ł. (2014), Commentary, in: The law on competition and consumer protection, ed. Skoczny T., C.H. Beck, Warsaw.
• Drachal J., Jagielski J., Gołaszewski P. (2013), Commentary, in: The law of administrative proceedings. ed. Hauser R., Wierzbowski M., C.H. Beck, Warsaw.
• Flaga-Gieruszyńska K. (2014), Commentary, in: Code of civil procedure, ed. Zieliński A., C.H. Beck, Warsaw.
• Jasińska K. (2013), Control of administration by the administrative courts and common courts (several remarks on the example of appealing against the decision of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection in
• competition matter), in: The control of licensed economic activity in the administrative courts decisions, ed. Kisielewicz A., Tarno J.P., WoltersKluwer Polska, Warsaw.
• Kmieciak Z. (2002), Competition proceedings and the concept of hybrid procedure „Państwo i Prawo”, no.4.
• Kunicki I. (2014), Commentary to the articles 367-729, in :Code of civil procedure, Vol. II, ed. Marciniak A., Piasecki K., C.H. Beck, Warsaw.
• Róziewicz-Ładoń K. (2011), Proceedings in front of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection regarding counteracting practices restricting competition, WoltersKluwer Polska, Warsaw
• Skoczny T. (2014), Commentary, in: Competition and Consumer Protection Act, ed. Skoczny T., C.H. Beck, Warsaw .
• Stefańska E. (2011), A few remarks on the impact of administrative proceedings conducted by antitrust and regulatory authorities on proceedings in the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection, in: The theory of administrative law
• institutions. Commemorative Book of Professor Jerzy Landrod, ed. Niczyporuk J., Polska Akademia Nauk, Paris – Lublin.
• Stefańska E. (2013), Commentary, in: Code of Civil Procedure, ed. Manowska M., published by Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warsaw.
• Turliński A. (2005), The Court of Competition and Consumer Protection in the system of legal protection bodies,in: Protection of competition and consumers in Poland and the European Union (legal and economic studies), ed. Banasiński C., Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów, Warsaw.
• The Act of 14 June 1960 Code of Administrative Procedure, Official Journal 2017, item 1257, as amended
• The Act of 17 November 1964 Code of Civil Procedure, Official Journal 2016, item 1822, as amended
• The Act of 2 July 2004 Act on freedom of economic activity, Official Journal 2016, item 1829, as amended
• The Act of 16 February 2007 The Law on competition and consumer protection, Official Journal 2017, item 229, as amended

Identifiers

ISSN

2353 - 9119