Places in placelessness — notes on the aesthetic and the strategies of place–making

• Authors: Korusiewicz Maria
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper discusses the aesthetic aspects of place-making practices in the urban environment of Western metropoles that are struggling with the progressive undifferentiation of their space and the weakening of communal and personal bonds. The paper starts by describing the general characteristics of an urban environment as distinct from the traditional vision of a city as a well-structured entity, and in relation to formal and informal aesthetics and participatory design ideas. The author then focuses on two contrary but complementary tactics for translating a space into a positively evaluated place: by domesticating it through introducing nature into an urbanscape; and by accentuating its alienness with the example of the urban exploration movement. The growing popularity of the latter is presented in relation to the discourses related to the decline of cities and the romantic endeavours for reaching into the realm of the unknown or the uncanny in order to rediscover and enrich the unique identity of a place. The paper ends with conclusions that present the necessity for the cultivation of a multidimensional aesthetic awareness and an aesthetic engagement as a crucial issue in the complex task of endowing places with a density of meaning.

Keywords

EN

domestication; exoticisation; urban exploration; aesthetic engagement

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
• Journal: ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
• Year: 2015
• Volume: Tom: 5
• Issue: Numer: 2
• Pages: 399-413

Dates

published

2015

Contributors

author

Korusiewicz Maria

• University of Bielsko ‑Biała (ATH), Poland

References

• Abel, C. (2000). Architecture and identity: Responses to cultural and technological change. London–Oxford–New York: Routledge.
• Akkerman, A. (2000). Harmonies of urban design and discords of city‑form: Urban aesthetics in the rise of western civilization. Journal of Urban Design, 5(3), 267–290. Retrieved from:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713683970 (10.05.2015).
• Albrecht, G. (2005). ‘Solastalgia’: a new concept in health and identity. PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature, 3, 41–55.
• Augé, M. (1995). Non‑places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.
• Apel, D. (2015). Beautiful terrible ruins: Detroit and the anxiety of decline. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
• Berleant, A. (2012a). Distant cities: Thoughts on an aesthetics of urbanism. In: A. Berleant. Aesthetics beyond the arts: New and recent essays (pp. 105–117). Furnham: Ashgate.
• Berleant, A. (2012b). The aesthetic politics of environment. In: A. Berleant. Aesthetics beyond the arts: New and recent essays (pp. 181–195). Furnham: Ashgate.
• Berleant, A. & Carlson, A. (Eds.). (2007). The aesthetics of human environments. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
• Berman, J. (2001). Modernist fiction, cosmopolitanism and the politics of community. Cambridge - New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Blanc, N. (2013). Aesthetic engagement in the city. Contemporary Aesthetics, 11. Retrieved from: http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=683 (09.05.2015).
• Certeau, M. de. (2011). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Fleming, R. L. & von Tscharner, R. (1987). Place makers: Creating public art that tells you where you are. Boston: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
• Galindo, P. & Hidalgo, C. (2005). Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: Environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes. International Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 19–26.
• Guerrieri, V., Hartley, D., & Hurst, E. (2012). Within‑city variation in urban decline: The case of Detroit. American Economic Review, 102(3), 120–126. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/q330/Downloads/WithincityVariationInUrbanDecline_preview.pdf (07.05.2015).
• Gurgul, A. (2015). Zielenią posprzątali chodnik. Urzędnik to sprawdzi. Gazeta Wyborcza.Kraków, 261, 1.
• Gwóźdź, A. (2006). Ciało ekranowe jako medium pamięci kulturowej. In: A. Gwóźdź & A. Nieracka‑Ćwikiel (Eds.). Media, ciało, pamięć. O współczesnych tożsamościach kulturowych (pp. 126–146). Warszawa: Instytut im. Adama Mickiewicza.
• Jacobs, J. (1958). Downtown is for people. Fortune Magazine, 57(4). Retrieved from: http://fortune.com/2011/09/18/downtown‑is‑for‑people‑fortune‑classic‑1958/ (02.08.2015).
• Jarvie, J. (2012). The limits of commissioned street art. Citylab. Retrieved from: http://www.citylab.com/design/2012/12/limits‑commissioned‑street‑art/4058/ (31.07.2015).
• Knoop, B. (2014). Nothing but growth for shrinking cities? Urban planning and its influencing factors in Poland. (Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, Leipzig, September 2–6, 2014). Retrieved from: http://www.degrowth.de/wp‑content/uploads/2015/08/3668.pdf (04.01.2016).
• Lang, R. E. & Dhavale, D. (2005). Beyond megalopolis: Exploring America’s new ‘megapolitan’ geography. Census Report May 2005. Retrieved from: http://america2050.org/pdf/beyondmegalopolislang.pdf (04.01.2016).
• McClure, W. & Hurand, F. A. (2001). Re‑engaging the public in the art of community place‑making. In: M. A. Burayidi (Ed.). Downtowns: Revitalizing the centers of small urban communities (pp. 107–121). New York: Routledge.
• Mishori, D. (2010). Conceptualizing the commons: On the rhetoric of environmental rights and public ownership. In: O. F. von Feingenblatt (Ed.). Reflection on development and conflict in the 21st century (pp. 104–127). Delray Beach: JAPSS Press Inc.
• Neckerman, K. M. et al. (2009). Disparities in urban neighborhood conditions: Evidence from GIS measures and field observation in New York City. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, 264–285
• Oddie, R. (2011). Other voices, acoustic ecology and urban soundscapes. In: I. Leman‑Stefanovic & S. B. Scharpe (Eds.). The natural city: Re‑envisioning the built environment (pp. 161–173). Toronto–London: University of Toronto Press.
• Orr, D. (2002). Nature of design: Ecology, culture, and human intention. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Paiva, T. & Manaugh, G. (Eds.). (2013). Night vision: The art of urban exploration. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
• Patterson, M. E. & Willians, D. R. (2005). Maintaining research traditions on place: Diversity of thought and scientific progress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 361–380.
• Retrieved from: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/value/docs/Maintaining%20research%20traditions%20on%20place%20Patterson‑Williams%202005%2 (25.06.2015).
• Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108. Retrieved from: http://faculty.washington.edu/mpurcell/geojournal.pdf (01.06.2015).
• Raymond, I. (2000). The urban picturesque: An aesthetic experience of urban pedestrian places. Journal of Urban Design, 5(2), 145–180. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713683961?src=recsys (10.06.2015).
• Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
• Relph, E. (2014). The paradox of place and the evolution of placelessness. (Lecture delivered at ‘Place and Placessness in the 21st Century City’ Symposium). Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gXqkq3zTzk (20.12.2015).
• Rigley, S. (2011). From fragmented city to Archipelago: New Orleans. The Culture Now Project. Retrieved from: http://cargocollective.com/UCLA/From‑fragmented‑city‑to‑Archipelago‑New‑Orleans (24.06.2015).
• Ruppert, E. S. (2005). The moral economy of cities: Shaping good citizens. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Saito, Y. (2014). Aesthetic engagement with built landscapes. Topos. Landscape Architecture, Spatial Planning and Cultural Geography. Retrieved from: http://www.toposonline.nl/2014/aesthetic‑engagement‑with‑built‑landscape‑2/ (03.05.2015).
• Seamon, D. (2012). Place, place identity and phenomenology: A triadic interpretation based on J. G. Bennett’s systematics. In: H. Caskin & F. Bernardo (Eds.). The role of place identity in the perception, understanding, and design of built environments (pp. 3–21). Beijing: Bentham Science Publishers.
• Seamon, D. & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and placessness: Edward Relph. In: P. Hubbard,
• R. Kitchen, & G. Vallentine (Eds.). Key texts in human geography (pp. 43–45). London: Sage. Retrieved from: http://www.arch.ksu.edu/seamon/place_%26_placelessness_classic_texts.pdf (07.04.2015).
• Smith, N. (2005). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.
• Springer, F. (2013). Wanna z kolumnadą. Reportaże o polskiej przestrzeni. Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne.
• Sternberg, R. (1991). The urban aesthetic in comparative perspective. Environmental, Urban and Geographic Studies, 24, 70–79. Retrieved from: http://msaag.org/wp‑content/uploads/2013/04/12_Sternberg.pdf (03.04.2015).
• Taylor, P. J. (2004). World city network: A global urban analysis. New York–London: Routledge.
• Tuan, Yi‑Fu. (1977). Place and space: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Urbagram. (2010). Licence by A. Bawa‑Cavia. Retrieved from: http://www.urbagram.net/archipelago/ (20.06.2015).
• Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
• Yang, W. (2010). Brief study on domestication and foreignization in translation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 77–80. Retrieved from: http://ojs.academypublisher.com/index.php/jltr/article/viewFile/01017780/1511 (23.06.2015)