“You Can Choose… Or We Would Go to ‘Turkeys’ or to Houses” – Verbal Interactions of Five-Year-Old Children During Story Creation

• Authors: Joanna Smogorzewska
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper presents the results of an analysis of interactions which appeared during group storytelling. One of two methods was used for the storytelling: the Storyline method or the Associations Pyramid method. Seventy five-year-old children took part in the study. The results show that children are able to use different strategies to create a story together, the language and communication competence of the children is already well developed, and the children are ready for effective cooperation

Keywords

EN

verbal interaction; storytelling; Storyline method; Associations Pyramid method; children’s cooperation

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Psychology of Language and Communication
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 157-174

Dates

published

2013-09-01

online

2013-09-06

Contributors

author

Joanna Smogorzewska

• Academy of Special Education, Szczęśliwicka 40, 02-353 Warsaw, Poland

References

• Bell, S. & Harkness, S. (2006). Storyline - Promoting Language Across the Curriculum. Royston: UKLA.
• Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatisein the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
• Bokus, B. (1991). Tworzenie opowiadań przez dzieci. O linii i polu narracji [ChildrenCreate Stories. Narrative Line and Narrative Field]. Kielce: Energeia.
• Bokus, B. (2009). Children’s pragmatic and metapragmatic knowledge of storytelling. In E. Pisula & P. Tomaszewski (Eds.), New Ideas in Studying andSupporting the Development of Exceptional People. Essays in Honor of TadeuszGałkowski (pp. 64-78). Warszawa: WUW.
• Bokus, B. & Garstka, T. (2009). Toward a shared metaphoric meaning in children’s discourse: The role of argumentation. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40 (4), 193-203.
• Bruner, J. (1978). Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing. New York, NY: Norton.
• Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Strategic uses of peer learning in children’s education. In T.J. Berndt & G.W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer Relationship in Child Development (pp. 135-157). New York, NY: Wiley.
• Forman, E.A. & Cazden, C.B. (1988). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: the cognitive value of peer interaction. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture,Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives (pp. 323-347). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Gralewski, J. (2004). Piramida skojarzeń jako nowa metoda pomocna w tworzeniu [Associations pyramid as a new method helping in creating]. In S. Popek, R.E. Bernacka, C.W. Domański, B. Gawda, & D. Turska (Eds.), Twórczość w teoriii praktyce [Creativity in Theory and in Practice] (pp. 343-356). Lublin: UMCS.
• Granott, N. (1993). Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of knowledge: Separate minds, joint effort, and weird creatures. In R.H. Wozniak & K.W. Fisher (Eds.), Development in Context: Acting and Thinking in Specific Environments (pp. 183-207). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Holmes-Lomergan, H.A. (2003). Preschool children’s collaborative problemsolving interactions: The role of gender, pair type, and task. Sex Roles, 48 (11/12), 505-517.
• Jones, I. (2002). Social relationships, peer collaboration and children’s oral language. Educational Psychology, 22 (1), 63-73.[Crossref]
• Kujawski, J. (2000). Zarys programu pracy z dziećmi i młodzieżą zdolną [An outline program for working with able children and teenagers]. In M. Partyka (Ed.), Modele opieki nad dzieckiem zdolnym [Care Models for the Able Child] (pp. 130-137). Warszawa: Centrum Metodyczne Pomocy Psychologiczno- Pedagogicznej Ministerstwa Edukacji Narodowej.
• Piaget, J. (2006). The Child’s Conception of the World: A 20th-Century Classic ofChild Psychology. London, UK: Routledge.
• Rapley, T. (2008). Doing Conversation, Discourse and Document Analysis (QualitativeResearch Kit). London, UK: Sage.
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking. Cognitive Development in SocialContext. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Rzechowska, E. (2004). Potencjalność w procesie rozwoju: mikroanaliza konstruowaniawiedzy w dziecięcych interakcjach rówieśniczych [Potentiality inthe Development Process: Microanalysis of Constructing Knowledge in Children’sPeer Interactions]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.
• Schaffer, H.R. (2006). Key Concepts in Developmental Psychology. London, UK: Sage.
• Shugar, G.W. & Bokus, B. (1988). Twórczość językowa dziecka w sytuacji zabawowozadaniowej [Child Language Creativity in Play-Task Situations]. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
• Smogorzewska, J. (2008). “Był raz sobie zamek prostokątny (…)” - wybrane uwarunkowania tworczości werbalnej dzieci pięcioletnich [“Once upon a time there was a rectangular castle …” - chosen conditions for five-yearolds’ verbal creativity]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Academy of Special Education, Warsaw.
• Smogorzewska, J. (2009). Rozpoznawanie poziomu tworczości werbalnej dziecka w wieku przedszkolnym - problemy i rozwiązania [Diagnosis of the level of child’s language creativity - problems and solutions]. In M. Karwowski (Ed.), Identyfikacja potencjału twórczego. Teoria. Metodologia. Diagnostyka [Identification of Creative Potential. Theory. Methodology. Diagnosis] (pp. 55-75). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
• Smogorzewska, J. (2012). “Storyline” and “Association Pyramid” as methods of creativity enhancement: Comparison of effectiveness in 5-year-old children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 28-37.
• Smogorzewska, J. (2012). Metoda „Storyline” a wybrane koncepcje pedagogiki i psychologii [The Storyline method and some pedagogical and psychological conceptions]. Ruch Pedagogiczny, 3, 117-135.
• Tokarz, M. (2006). Argumentacja, Perswazja, Manipulacja. Wykłady z teorii komunikacji [Argumentation, Persuasion, Manipulation. Lectures from Theory ofCommunication]. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976), The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/plc-2013-0010