Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 2 | 2 |

Article title

Attitudes towards unethical behaviours in organizational settings: an empirical study

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Employee misconduct is prevalent in organizations and may be counterproductive in social and material terms. It is thus important to better understand how misconduct is construed by employees and the factors that determine its ethical acceptability in specific cases. This study explores attitudes towards unethical and minor deviant behaviours by examining the degree of acquiescence towards them in a sample of employees. Based on previous studies it was hypothesized that both organizational commitment and job satisfaction would be negatively related to the acceptance of such behaviours in organizational settings. Results show that there is a relationship between the degree of acquiescence and organizational commitment and a more modest relationship with job satisfaction. They further indicate that organizational tenure impacts very significantly on the degree of acceptance. Although differences were found for age, neither gender nor organizational variables were found to be significant.

Year

Volume

2

Issue

2

Physical description

Dates

published
2011-09-01

Contributors

  • Porto

References

  • Appelbaum, S.H., Shapiro, B.T., & Molson, J. (2006). Diagnosis and remedies for deviant workplace behaviors. Journal of American Academy of Business, 9, 14-20.
  • Ashman, I. & Winstanley, D. (2006). The ethics of organizational commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 142- 153.
  • Becker,T.E. & Bennett, R.J. (2006). Employee attachment and deviance in organizations. In J. Langan-Fox, C. Cooper., & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Research Companion to the Dysfunctional Workplace: Management Challenges and Symptoms (pp.136-151). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
  • Bennett, R.J. & Robinson, S.J. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349-360
  • Bordia, P. Restubog, S.L., & Tang, R.L. (2008). When employees strike back: Investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1104-1117.
  • Fox, S. & Spector, P.E. (1999). A model of work frustration-aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 91-931.
  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
  • Griffin, R.W., O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., & Collins, J. M. (1998). Dysfunctional work behavior in organizations. In C.L. Cooper & D.M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in Organizational Behavior (pp.65-82). New York: Wiley.
  • Hollinger,R.C. (1986). Acts against the workplace: Social bonding and employee deviance. Deviant Behavior, 7, 53-75.
  • Ilies, R. Fulmer, IS. Spitzmuller, M., & Johnson, M.D. (2009). Personality and citizenship behaviour: the mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 945-959.
  • Jones, T.M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent mode. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366-395.
  • Jones, W.A.(1990). Student views of ‘ethical’ issues: A situational analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 201-205.
  • Judge, T.A. Scott, B.A., & Ilies, R. (2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 126-138.
  • Kim, H-R., Lee, M., Lee, H-T., & Kim, N-M (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee-company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 557-569.
  • Kish-Gephart, J.J., Harrison, D.A., & Treviño, L.K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1-31.
  • Klein, H. J., Becker, T.E., & Meyer, J.P. (2009). Commitment in Organizations (SIOP Organizational Frontiers Series). New York and London: Routledge.
  • Lawrence, T. B. & Robinson, S. L. (2007). Ain’t misbehavin: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. Journal of Management, 33, 378-394.
  • Loo, T.W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185-204.
  • Mangione, T.W. & Quinn, R.P. (1975). Job satisfaction, counterproductive behavior, and drug abuse at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 114-116.
  • Marcus, B. & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 647-660.
  • Meyer, J. & Allen, N.(1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
  • Meyer, J.P., Becker, T.E., & van Dick, R. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior Special Issue: Commitment and Identification: Forms, Foci, and Future, 27, 665-683.
  • Mudrack, P. (1993). An investigation into the acceptability of workplace behaviors of a dubious ethical nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 517-524.
  • O'Fallon, M. & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decisionmaking literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375-413.
  • Robinson, S. L. & Bennett, R. (1995). A typology of deviant behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572.
  • Robinson, S. & O’Leary-Kelly, A.M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 659-672.
  • Sims, R.L. (2002). Ethical rule breaking by employees: A test of social bonding theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 101-109.
  • Sims, R. L. (2010). A study of deviance as a retaliatory response to organizational power. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 553-563.
  • Skarlicki, D.P. & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 422-443.
  • Spector, P. E. (1997). The role of frustration in antisocial behavior at work. In R.A.Giacalone & J.Greenberg (Ed.), Antisocial Behavior in Organizations (pp.1- 17). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  • Spector, P.E., Fox, S., Penney, L.M., Bruusema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446-460.
  • Tomlinson, E. C. & Greenberg, J. (2006). Understanding and deterring employee theft with organizational justice. In J. Langan-Fox, C. Cooper. & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Research Companion to the Dysfunctional Workplace: Management Challenges and Symptoms (pp.285-301). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
  • Umphress, E. E. Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M.S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 769-780.
  • Vardi, Y. & Wiener, Y. (1996). Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework. Organization Science, 7, 151-165.
  • Vardi, Y. & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management. Mahwah, N.J.: Erbaum.
  • Warr, P. Cook, J. & Wall, T. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129 – 148.
  • Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418-428.
  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. (2010). Employee deviance as a response to injustice and task-related discontent. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 13, 131-146.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_eip_2011_2_1
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.