Improving the Relationship between Welfare Economics and Ethics

• Authors: Carmen Pagliari , Iacopo Odoardi
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this essay, the essential aspects of Welfare Economics are summarized in order to analyse the possible links with Ethics, and consequently to provide useful suggestions for Economic Policy. The Introduction contains the principles of neoclassical Welfare Economics, without considering the circumstances in which the so‑called failures of competitive markets occur. The second part of this paper contains a description of two possible solutions to the problem concerning the integration of Welfare Economics and Ethics. The first solution is the determination of the optimal combination of general competitive equilibrium principles and social ethics ones, without removing the theoretical structure of Welfare Economics. This first proposal, while retaining some economic liberalism principles, assigns a central role to the government, which is delegated to superimpose on the Pareto criterion a distributive justice rule. Another solution, which is suggested by Sen, is essentially directed to modify Welfare Economics by ethical criteria aimed at improving every individual deprivation, and it is based on the distinction between the two concepts of ‘utility’ and ‘agency’. We also proposed exploiting the original considerations written by Smith about social aspects as a useful integration and support to Sen’s approach.

Keywords

EN

Welfare Economics; Methodological Individualism; Allocative Efficiency; Ethics

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 37-50

Dates

published

2018-02-19

Contributors

author

Carmen Pagliari

author

Iacopo Odoardi

References

• Beckerman W., The Role of Welfare Economics [in:] Economics as Applied Ethics, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2017.
• Bronfenbrenner M., Equality and Equity, “Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science” 1973, Vol. 409, pp. 9–23.
• Costabile L., Amartya Sen e le questioni di genere, “Testimonianze” 2004, Vol. 433, pp. 11–23.
• Crawford V.P., A Procedure for Generating Pareto‑Efficient Egalitarian‑Equivalent Allocations, “Econometrica” 1979, Vol. 47, pp. 49–60.
• De Stefanis S., V. Sena, Health, Capabilities and Functionings: An Empirical Analysis for the UK, Working Paper, No. 151, 2006, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance – University of Salerno (Italy).
• Duclos J.Y., Innis Lecture: Equity and Equality, “The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Economique” 2006, Vol. 39, pp. 1073–1104.
• Grasso M., A Dynamic Operationalization of Sen’s Capability Approach, Working Paper Series, No. 59, 2002, Dip. of Political Economics, University of Milan – Bicocca (Italy).
• Hicks J.R., The Foundations of Welfare Economics, “The Economic Journal” 1939, Vol. 49, pp. 696–712.
• Impicciatore G., Introduzione alla moderna microeconomia, ed. CEDAM, Padova 2006.
• Krishnakumar J., P. Ballon, Estimating Basic Capabilities: A Structural Equation Model Applied to Bolivia, “World Development” 2008, Vol. 36, pp. 992–1010.
• Lucas Jr. R.E., On the Mechanics of Economic Development, “Journal of Monetary Economics” 1988, Vol. 22, pp. 3–42.
• Mas‑Colell A., M.D. Whinston, J.R. Green, Microeconomic theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996.
• Mattoscio N., C. Pagliari, Equilibri economici non cooperativi e teoria dei giochi, ed. CEDAM, Padova 1990.
• McGregor J.A., N. Pouw, Towards an Economics of Well‑being, “Cambridge Journal of Economics” 2016, Vol. 41, pp. 1123–1142.
• Quirk J., R. Saposnik, Introduction to General Equilibrium and Welfare Economics, McGraw‑Hill, New York 1968.
• Robeyns I., Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement, “Social Indicators Research” 2005, Vol. 74, pp. 191–215.
• Sen A.K., Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden Day, San Francisco 1970.
• Sen A.K., Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
• Sen A.K., On Ethics and Economics, Blackwell, London 1988.
• Sitarz S., Pareto Optimal Allocations and Dynamic Programming, “Annals of Operations Research” 2009, Vol. 172, pp. 203–219.
• Smith A., An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Edwin Cannan, New York 1776.
• Smith A., Essay on Philosophical Subjects, T. Cadell Jun. and W. Davies, London 1795.
• Smith A., Lectures on Jurisprudence [in:] Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Vol. V, eds. R.L. Meek, D.D. Raphael, P.G. Stein, Oxford Univesity Press,Oxford 1978[1763].
• Smith A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments, A. Millar, London 1759.
• Walsh V., H. Gram, Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium: Historical Origins and Mathematical Structure, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1980.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1899-2226.20.4.03