Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Knowledge and Artifacts. Barry Allen's Concept of Knowledge

100%
Czarnocka M.
Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
|
2005
|
issue 3-4
351-367
EN
Barry Allen postulates that the unit of knowledge is artifact and rejects traditional idea that knowledge consists of true, justified beliefs. Analysis of Allen's concept of knowledge, being a restrictive form of pragmatism, shows that the epistemological change proposed by him is radical to a great degree. Allen neglects all important epistemological distinctions and categories. The concept is rooted in a different culture, activist and one-sidedly pragmatic, far from this one ( which emerged from the ancient Greek ideas) that constitutes a basis for all traditional epistemological models of knowledge.
2
Content available remote

Lucio Russo's Concept of Science

100%
Czarnocka M.
Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
|
2007
|
vol. 43
|
issue 2(172)
303-311
EN
Russo offers a concept of science that is anti-empirical according to his declarations. However, he permanently includes empirical elements in his models of natural sciences, and even of mathematics. A tension between empirical and non-empirical character of science in the Russo's model leads it to non-consistency and even to contradiction.
3
Content available remote

INTEGRAL NATURALISM

100%
Czarnocka M.
Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
|
2004
|
vol. 40
|
issue 4(162)
677-697
EN
Relationship between science and philosophy is analysed and the conclusions are mainly baased on Quine's and Lelas' conceptions of naturalising. It is argued that between the exclusion of science from philosophy and complete reduction of philosophy to science, there is a third possible way, of a dialogue character, taking science indirectly, selectively, and - after conceptual transformations - as a source of philosophical theories that remain autonomous,
4

Why is Naturalization of Epistemology not Possible?

100%
Czarnocka M.
Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria
|
2006
|
vol. 15
|
issue 2(58)
137-153
EN
The so-called naturalization of epistemology (within the framework of a scientific theory) requires: (a) theoretically neutral and philosophically autonomous conceptual assumptions, (b) choosing conceptually and in respect to content changed laws of the theory, (c) transforming them - under a philosophically autonomous assumption - into relevant epistemological claims. All these three elements engage speculations and in this way assert an autonomous status to epistemology.
5

Philosophy of Science and its Harmful Dichotomies

100%
Czarnocka M.
Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria
|
2007
|
vol. 16
|
issue 3(63)
113-128
EN
The paper is concerned with the fundamental dichotomies that organize the ways of investigations in today's philosophy of science: normative versus naturalized epistemology, context of justification versus context of discovery, rationality versus irrationality, theory versus experience. It is shown that these dichotomies are not sustainable. They result in inadequate, even false images of science.
6

NATURALIZATION OF EPISTEMOLOGY AND SPECULATIONS

100%
Czarnocka M.
Edukacja Filozoficzna
|
2006
|
issue 41
7-14
EN
The program of naturalization of epistemology, which postulates the eliminative reduction of epistemology in science, cannot be realized. It ignores the very nature of epistemology. Naturalization of epistemology require philosophically autonomous elements drawn from the speculative knowledge.
7

ON HUMAN NATURE AND MENTALITY. REMARKS ON THE PROFESSOR GRZEGORCZYK CONCEPTIOM OF MAN

100%
Czarnocka M.
Edukacja Filozoficzna
|
2005
|
issue 39
49-55
EN
Basically, the Grzegorczyk's concept of mentality, presented in his book 'Psychiczna osobliwosc czlowieka' (2003) ( Psychic Singularity of Man), stems from the culture of the culitvated higher social classes. The authoress considers critically this conception by showing that it is not acceptable on the descriptive level and seriously questionable on the normative one.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.