Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Protectionism with respect to innovation entities and legal enforcement of innovation stimuli is an imperative for economic growth. However, innovations as a market factor have not strictly interpreted, meaning that mechanisms of their effects are not clear. The role of innovations for product markets is well defined in the American antitrust rules, especially their role in merger of companies and firms. However, their practical use of these rules is problematic, as implications of mergers caused by innovations can hardly be predicted. The main (doctrinal) problem faced by antitrust rules is accounting for innovations, as innovations are hardly identifiable and predictable, and not always appear as a direct response to a large investment in R&D. The most efficient approach seems to lie in evaluation of innovation effects on mergers of high tech companies. But this evaluation will be problematic due to uncertain relation between R&D and market promotion of new products and other marketing related factors with respect of a new product. Also, because innovations are a form of non-price competition, they cannot be taken as a conventional category for analysis. Furthermore, it's not always clear what kind of market conditions is favorable for innovations promotion. However, it's supposed that most of the above problems can be resolved in the framework of the existing antitrust rules, by inclusion of new groups of indicators that evaluate position of innovations in the market environment, effects of R&D markets, effects of traditional markets, effects of building up new markets, 'overlapping' effects of actors of various markets.
EN
Globalization increases the role of partnerships between the government, local administrations, private and academic sectors, allowing for coordination, regulation and management in the condition of radical change in the role of government and in relations with the environment. Levels and types of partnerships are analyzed, principles and mechanisms for the effective partnership between government and private sector in S&T are discussed, specifics of S&T partnerships are shown. Experiences of building up partnerships in research and innovation are shown by looking at their evolution in the USA, the EU and Asian countries (Taiwan, Japan). In Ukraine, beginning of 90s marked the disruption of previously existing types of partnerships and the need to push technologically advanced enterprises to the external market, which was an ultimately new matter for Ukraine. At the same time, 'intra-level' competition between the actors of the innovation process was boosting: rivalry for finances between research organizations, rivalry between universities for students studying on contract basis, rivalry between businessmen for 'ownerless' resources. However, these rivalries had nothing common with setting up effective links for innovation purposes. Also, economic openness of Ukraine revealed its weakness as an actor at the world technology market. The distinction of the innovation system in Ukraine (and Russia) from technologically advanced countries is in a large share of the government R&D sector, small number of large R&D-intensive companies and weakness of the small innovation business; in failure of the business environment to stimulate various S&T partnerships. In spite of declarations about S&T and innovation stimuli, steps on building up the required basis for partnerships only began in Ukraine, with organization, in 2006, of the scientific park 'Kiyevskaya Politekhnika', on the basis of the National Technical University in Kiev.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.