Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Felix Vodička: Úkoly literární historie a jejich zdroj

100%
Kubíček T.
Časopis pro moderní filologii (Journal for Modern Philology)
|
2010
|
vol. 92
|
issue 1-2
85-95
EN
The paper aims to present and interpret the methods of literary history developed by Felix Vodicka, one of the main representatives of Czech structuralism. The paper describes the variables of the paradigm in the field of literary history and the reasons for this metamorphosis. Attention is focused on the most significant notions of the structuralist analysis of the diachrony of structure: aesthetic object, aesthetic norm, esthetic function and aesthetic value, which were traditionally connected with the synchronic point of view of analysis, and which Vodicka strives “to translate” into the language of diachronic analysis.
2
Content available remote

Sémiotika žánru historické fikce

100%
Kubíček T.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2011
|
vol. 59
|
issue 5
655-678
EN
The essay focuses on definitions of the ‘historical novel’ and argues that they are inadequate because they need to demonstrate why the text and the fictional world are relevant to the historical novel, by means of data from another set of ontological assumptions, the world of facts. The essay therefore proposes a semiotically based definition arising solely from the text and the fictional world of the text.
3
Content available remote

NESPOLEHLIVOST – ALE K ČEMU? PŘÍSPĚVEK K ANALÝZE SPECIFICKÉ NARATIVNÍ STRATEGIE VÝZNAMOVÉ VÝSTAVBY

100%
Kubíček T.
World Literature Studies
|
2013
|
vol. 5 (22)
|
issue 1
3 – 16
EN
The main aim of the text is to analyse the narratological category “unreliability” in relation to the basic domains within which it is defined by the post classical narratology. The basis for the analysis are various texts − both the fictional and the nonfictional nature. In the scope of this study are fictional and nonfictional speakers and characters in relation to the three dimensions of textual worlds which are here understood as the strategy of construction of the meaning: the first is the domain or the construction of “truth”, the second is the domain or construction of “self” and the third one is the domain or constructing of the whole of the fictional world − the domain of the text. The author suggests in his study that while the first two domains are clamouring extra textual control activities, which is the relationship between text and context, only the third domain allows us to perceive unreliability as a narrative category as a category of narrative analysis.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.