Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Umělecký vliv, jeho průkaznost a relevance : K typologii odkazů v beletrii 19. století

100%
Charypar M.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2016
|
vol. 64
|
issue 5
668-695
EN
This study focuses on the issues surrounding artistic influence in high literature and the ways that the extent and relevance of this influence can be comprehended. It is loosely associated with intertextual and comparative examination of fiction and in this context it attempts to redefine and revive the little used concept of influence, working with the idea of the (literary) reference and distinguishing between the principle of the proximity of references, which examines the analogy between pretext and posttext, and the principle of the individuation of references, which reflects the innovative share of the poet or writer in the creative treatment of the pretext. The examples to which these hypotheses relate are taken from the literary reception of the Dvůr Králové and Zelená Hora manuscripts in 19th century Czech literature.
CS
Studie se zaměřuje na problematiku uměleckého vlivu v krásné literatuře a na způsoby postižení míry a relevance tohoto vlivu. Volně se přidružuje k intertextuálnímu a komparativnímu zkoumání beletrie a v tomto kontextu se pokouší redefinovat a znovu oživit nepříliš užívaný pojem vliv. Pracuje s pojmem (literárního) odkazu a rozlišuje mezi principem proximity odkazů, který zkoumá analogie mezi pretextem a posttextem, a principem individuace odkazů, který zohledňuje inovativní podíl básníka či spisovatele při tvůrčím nakládání s pretextem. Příklady, na nichž se tyto hypotézy dokládají, jsou brány z oblasti literární recepce Rukopisů královédvorského a zelenohorského v české literatuře 19. století.
2
Content available remote

Otázky rukopisu Máchova Máje : k chystané kritické edici básně

100%
Charypar M.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2017
|
vol. 65
|
issue 4
540-564
EN
This study deals with one of the key topics relating to the forthcoming critical edition of Mácha’s Máj in the Kritická hybridní edice (KHE, Critical Hybrid Series) library, i.e. issues surrounding the only preserved manuscript of Mácha’s poem. It not only provides an analysis of this manuscript, which was discovered eighty years after the poet’s death and has not yet been appropriately examined, but also compares it with other surviving sources of Máj — particularly the first printed edition from 1836, while attempting to determine its textological status. The forthcoming edition has helped to refute the hypothesis that the manuscript was meant for the censor. The overall character of the manuscript and an analysis of its linguistic and graphic divergences and similarities with the printed version indicate that the manscript was most probably not written until after the printed edition of the poem was published (in April 1836), most likely as a transcript of it made by the poet himself, who died that same year (in November 1836). Mácha’s personal papers also include a similar manuscript — a fragment of a diary from 1835 (R57), which was created by an identical recording technique, clearly from the same batch of paper as the manuscript of Máj, thus evidently playing a similar role. However, this study does not focus on the final published version, which will be the task of the proposed publication.
3
Content available remote

Zčeřená hladina - próza českého ideálního realismu : k vymezení literární poetiky

100%
Charypar M.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2019
|
vol. 67
|
issue 3
308-336
EN
This study presents the outline of a possible definition of literary poetics in Czech fictional prose in the latter half of the 19th century. It is based on the outline conceived by Dalibor Tureček and his team (Parnassianism and Realism), but points out the inadequately treated issue of Realism and the division of Parnassianism into two more or less distinct areas, while considering the possible condensation of the conceptual space in question. It arrives at a definition of a new poetics – Ideal Realism, which it distinguishes from Parnassianism and (Analytical) Realism. The conclusion of the study then sketches out the opportunities offered by the context of foreign, particularly Central European, literatures and the context of other types of literature (poetry and drama). The entire text, conceived as a consideration of this specific segment of Czech literary history, is meant to be a discussion piece that needs to be subjected to more extensive criticism before its completion and application.
4
Content available remote

Umělec v (pre)modernistickém smyslu: ohlas Máchova díla v literární publicistice po roce 1858

100%
Charypar M.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2021
|
vol. 69
|
issue 5
571-604
EN
This study seeks an answer to the question when and how the Czech romantic K. H. Mácha (1810–1836) started to be seen as a “modern” poet who could inspire authors writing decades after his death. The study proves that the image of “modern” Mácha as the first Czech poet to achieve the autonomy of art already existed between 1860 and 1890, and that Mácha’s artistic reputation grew constantly throughout the second half of the 19th century. This argument is based on a vast amount of evidence, mostly taken from literary journalism and criticism between 1858 and 1910 (the latter year seeing the centenary of Mácha’s birth).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.