Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article raises issues concerning legal basis for the application of the overriding mandatory rules. In the Polish doctrine there are two opposing concepts in terms of explanation of the legal grounds for application of overriding mandatory rules. Both theories do not have a universal dimension, in the sense that they do not sufficiently explain the basis for the application of domestic as well as foreign overriding mandatory rules, being part of lex causae or coming from a third state. The article presents arguments for and against the possibility of deriving the legal grounds for application of the overriding mandatory rules, with reference to submissions made to that effect in literature. The author makes also an attempt to formulate a concept complementary to the concept of an integrated conflict-of-law rule with the substantive law rule, boiling down to the assumption that the basis for application of overriding mandatory rule is a second degree conflict of laws rule allowing to apply a first degree conflict of laws rule integrated with the substantive rule.
PL
Normy kolizyjne prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego cechuje odmienna budowa od norm prawa merytorycznego (materialnego), co uwarunkowane jest celem, któremu służą. W literaturze wskazuje się, że normy kolizyjne prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego mają charakter norm technicznych, w związku z tym pojawia się pytanie, są one nośnikiem wartości, analogicznie jak normy prawa materialnego. Odpowiedź twierdząca wymaga dalszego rozstrzygnięcia, a mianowicie urzeczywistnieniu jakich wartości normy te służą, a także które wartości powinny być szczególnie preferowane przez racjonalnego prawodawcę. Celem niniejszego opracowania jest udzielenie odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy i jakie wartości, a także w jaki sposób urzeczywistniają normy kolizyjne prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego tworzone przez racjonalnego prawodawcę.
EN
Conflict of laws rules of private international law are characterised by a different structure than rules of substantive law, which is conditioned by the purpose they serve. The doctrine indicates that conflict of laws rules have purely a technical nature, therefore the question arises are whether these rules a carrier of values, the same as substantive law rules. Assuming however that conflict of laws rules are a carrier of values requires further inquiry concerning values which these norms serve, and which values should be particularly favoured by a rational legislator. The purpose of this study is an indication what values are implemented by conflict of laws rules adopted by a rational legislator.
EN
Main aim of this article is presentation of the legal framework for international investment arbitration in Polish — Ukrainian relations. Article presents the provisions of bilateral agree­ment on promotion and protection of foreign investment between the two mentioned coun­tries, as well as the provisions of multilateral international agreement to which both Poland and Ukraine are parties, namely the Energy Charter Treaty. Considerations in the article relate primarily to the legal framework of investment arbitration, however, also addresses the question of an economic nature which are tied to the protection and promotion of foreign investment. Some observations made in the article are more universal, not only referring to the investment arbitration in the Polish — Ukrainian relations but also retain their validity in relation to any investment disputes between the Polish and other countries, or states parties to the European Energy Charter.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.