Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
One of the most disputed issues in considerations on economic freedom as the fundamental right in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland is the issue of inclusion of public business entities in its scope. The considerations of the article are to demonstrate that it is possible to refer to the fundamental right by companies with ashareholding of territorial self-government entities, regardless of the size of such shareholding. Indicating that self-government companies do not belong, as a rule, to the system of public authorities bound by the constitutional rule of legalism would be in favour of such position (Article 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland) which must be exercised only within the limits of law but also based on the law. Therefore, they are not the emanation of the state as apublic authority. Moreover, the companies may oftentimes be in asimilar legal position towards public authorities as private entrepreneurs (e.g. as tax payers, parties in court proceedings or applying for concessions or permits). Therefore, it is possible to accept them as entities using the instrumental form of the freedom of economic activity, limited to the situation of legal analogy of the situation of the public and private entrepreneurs towards public authorities. Such freedom would not include the possibility to refer to it in the context of legal regulations which specifically and not generally refer to all entrepreneurs, specify the legal situation of apublic entrepreneur and at the same time determine the possibility to refer to agiven entrepreneur in such manner.
PL
Artykuł stanowi próbę posłużenia się jednym z elementów koncepcji racjonalnego prawodawcy, a więc założeniem o stanowieniu przez prawodawcę niesprzecznych (niewykluczających się) norm prawnych, w odniesieniu do, budzącej szereg wątpliwości interpretacyjnych, regulacji zmian umów o zamówienia publiczne, zawartej w obecnie obowiązujących dyrektywach unijnego prawa zamówień publicznych. W opracowaniu ukazano wewnętrzne sprzeczności i inne niedomogi odnośnych przepisów unijnego prawa wtórnego. Zaproponowano jednocześnie takie założenia co do wykładni tytułowej regulacji prawnej, aby przynajmniej ograniczać skutki jej wad konstrukcyjnych, w duchu respektowania podstawowych zasad prawa zamówień publicznych — równego traktowania wykonawców oraz ochrony konkurencji.
EN
The article is an attempt to use one of the elements of the concept of a rational legislator, i.e. the assumption that the legislator will establish non-contradictory legal norms in relation to regulation of changes in public procurement contracts contained in the currently applicable EU directives of public procurement law. This regulation raises a number of interpretation doubts. The study showed internal contradictions and other insufficiencies in the relevant provisions of EU secondary law. Such assumptions as to the interpretation of the title legal regulation have been proposed to at least limit the effects of its defects in design, in the spirit of respecting the basic principles of public procurement law — the equal treatment of contractors and protection of competition.
EN
The Municipal Services Management Act includes adefinition of public utility tasks, according to which the factors that distinguish the activity of this sort from other types of activities are: services as the sole type of activity; current and continuous method of performance; meeting the collective needs of the population and the common availability of services. Relating those, generally formulated premises, to actual public tasks of the local self-government often leads to interpretational questions in the field of qualifying those tasks either as public utility tasks or as tasks from beyond the scope of public utility. Solving those problems is not simplified by the legislator, who only occasionally defines the character of self-government’s tasks in the above-mentioned area and on occasions treats types of self-government activities, which do not meet the above-mentioned criteria, as public utility tasks. The aim of this article is to show those, questionable situations as well as to attempt to identify some clear guidelines for the purpose of interpretation of those premises that place the definition of public utility tasks within the system of Polish law.
EN
The article deals with the signifi cance and legal character of the provision of Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. This article provides for the freedom to conduct a business. Therefore, the article presents a standpoint regarding the qualifi cations of the right to conduct business within the framework of the division of provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into principles and fundamental rights (rights or freedoms). In the article’s considerations, the right to conduct business activity under art. 16 of the Charter is recognized as a fundamental right. The article also draws attention to the signifi cant deficiencies in the protection of economic freedom in EU law, in particular when it concerns the introduction of restrictions on this freedom in EU derivative law. Finally, comments are also made regarding the basic aspects of the subjective and objective scope of the right to conduct business.
Prawo
|
2019
|
issue 329
545 - 557
PL
W artykule poruszono problematykę regulacji prawa zamówień publicznych mających szczególne znaczenie dla zagadnienia możliwości wpływania przez wykonawców na treść umów o zamówienia publiczne. Ukazano brak zasadności utożsamiania takich umów z umowami adhezyjnymi. Wśród prawnych uwarunkowań wpływu wykonawców na treść umów o zamówienia w szczególności zwrócono uwagę na zasadę ochrony konkurencji, korzystanie z pozacenowych kryteriów oceny ofert, a także występowanie w poszczególnych trybach udzielania zamówień publicznych elementów negocjacyjnych.
EN
The article analyzes public procurement law regulations, which are of particular importance for the issue of the possibility for economic operators to influence the content of public procurement contracts. The lack of legitimacy of identifying such contracts with adhesive contracts has been shown. Among the legal conditions of the influence of economic operators on the content of public procurement contracts, the following were particularly noted: the principle of competition protection, the use of non-price criteria for the evaluation of bids, as well as the presence of negotiation elements in some public procurement procedures.
PL
W prawie europejskim współistnieją swobody rynku wewnętrznego (swoboda przepływu towarów i kapitału, przepływu osób (pracowników), swoboda prowadzenia działalności gospodarczej i świadczenia usług) i obowiązki państw członkowskich do osiągania celów środowiskowych, ochrony wrażliwych grup społecznych przed dyskryminacją i wykluczeniem lub zapewniania wysokiego poziomu zatrudnienia. Ta konkurencja polityk UE wymusza ustalenie, w jaki sposób instytucja prawna zamówień publicznych (jako obszar działania szeroko rozumianego państwa) może być wykorzystana do realizacji celów instrumentalnych (społecznych, środowiskowych) obok swojego nadrzędnego celu, tj. maksymalizacji bezpośredniej korzyści ekonomicznej z zamówienia publicznego. W artykule dokonano analizy stosownego orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej oraz przedstawianych na tle tego orzecznictwa poglądów nauki prawa zamówień publicznych. W rezultacie na wybranych przykładach ukazano pogłębiające się zjawisko społeczno-ekologicznej instrumentalizacji prawa zamówień publicznych jako kierunku rozwojowego tego zespołu unormowań.
EN
According to the law of the European Union, the freedoms of the single market (free movement of goods, capital and of people (workers), freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services), coexist with the obligations of Member States to achieve environmental objectives, protect vulnerable social groups against discrimination and exclusion, as well as to ensure a high level of employment. This competition between the EU policies undoubtedly necessitates the determination of how public procurement as a legal institution (an area of activity of the widely understood state) can be used to achieve instrumental (social, environmental) objectives, aside from its primary goal, i.e. maximizing the direct economic benefit from a public contract. This paper, within the scope of the abovementioned problem, analyses relevant judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union, as well as opinions with regard to these judgments presented by legal experts on public procurement. In effect, the phenomenon of increasing socio-ecological instrumentalization of public procurement law (seemingly the direction towards which this regulation is aimed), was demonstrated in light of the selected examples.
EN
The history of the Division of Public Economic Law dates back to 1973, when it was established within the structure of the Institute of Administrative Sciences, under the name of the Divition of National Economy Administration. Despite the transformation of the economic system, the main areas of scientific research and teaching assignments remain to be: state influence on economic processes, the principle of freedom of economic activity and its limits, public property management. The heads of the Division — Prof. Adam Chełmoński and Prof. Leon Kieres — not only belong to the most outstanding figures among Polish administrative law scholars, but have also stood out in public service activities. Over the years the staff of the Division has attained remarkable achievements in both scientific and didactic work. Scientific achievements include, among others, a significant contribution to the preparation of a fundamental work Public Economic Law, published in the series “System of Administrative Law”. The didactic work is carried out by the staff and doctoral students of the Division in all courses of study conducted by the Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics. The Division is among the most frequently chosen units for preparation of bachelor, master and doctoral theses by the students of the Faculty.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.