Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
With the development of technology, the appearance of new threats for the security of society and individuals may be observed. Brainjacking, understood as unauthorised access to brain implants, may become one of them. It could be used to gain unlawful access to personal data and also (e.g. by changing parameters like frequency or voltage on electrodes) to cause distress or even serious injuries. The aim of the paper is to present behaviours that may be included in the conceptual scope of brainjacking and also types of prohibited acts (i.a. Articles 269a, 156, 157 and 160 of the Polish Criminal Code) whose statutory requirements might be met by such behaviours. Moreover, possible concurrence of legal rules is pointed out as well as the impact of new technologies on the form and content of human rights which may require a redefinition. The main research method used in the paper involves an analysis of the law in force.
PL
Wraz z rozwojem technologii można zaobserwować pojawienie się nowych zagrożeń dla bezpieczeństwa społeczeństwa i jednostek. Jednym z nich jest brainjacking, rozumiany jako nieuprawniony dostęp do implantów mózgu. Takie działanie mogłoby być (np. poprzez zmianę parametrów jak częstotliwość czy napięcie na elektrodach) wykorzystywane do wywoływania uczucia dyskomfortu czy nawet poważnych urazów. Celem artykułu było przedstawienie zachowania mogącego wchodzić w zakres pojęciowy brainjackingu, a także typów czynów zabronionych, (art. 269a k.k., art. 156 k.k., art. 157 k.k., art. 160 k.k., 190a § 1 k.k.3), których ustawowe znamiona mogą zostać przez nie wypełnione. Ponadto wskazano możliwe zbiegi przepisów. W artykule zastosowano głównie metodę formalno-dogmatyczną.
EN
In the paper the phenomenon of political deepfake was discussed, constituting the type of political deepfake deriving from original deepfake classification regarding to the aim. It was concluded, that currently functioning measures may be insufficient. The proposition of new potential type of illicit act was formulated, differentiating socially harmful deepfake from artistic deepfake.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.