Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Konwencje, style myślenia i relatywizm. Kilka uwag o sporze I. Dąmbska – L. Fleck

100%
Szlachcic K.
Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia
|
2006
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
27-45
EN
My comments are focused on the debate between Izydora Dąmbska and Ludwik Fleck. In the course of their debate, which took place in the 1930's, they discussed some basic issues of epistemology, focusing on the problems of the sources of scientific knowledge, objectivity of knowledge, and truth. The aim of the paper is to place their debate in a the historical context and to demonstrate the novelty of Fleck's arguments, especially in comparison with Thomas S. Kuhn's later contribution. I also examine the dominant interpretations of Fleck's theory of knowledge, as well as the reasons for which his philosophical ideas, especially Entstehung und Entwiklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache (1935) have fallen into the philosophical oblivion. I argue that Fleck's views, although innovative, were less radical than it is commonly thought.
2
Content available remote

Andrzeja Kisielewicza pochwała zdrowego rozsądku

100%
Szlachcic K.
Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia
|
2018
|
vol. 13
|
issue 3
115-136
EN
Andrzej Kisielewicz’s praise of common sense I present here the evaluation and comments on the position of Andrzej Kisi­elewicz presented in his latest book, Logic and Arguments: A Practical Course in Critical Thinking. I recognize that this book can be of great benefit to a very diverse group of potential recipients. It is original in design, inspiring and even provoking the reader to discuss some of its main theses. I am debating some of the author’s views, in particular I draw attention to the relationship between logic and formal logic presented by Kisielewicz. I point to the similarity of some of the radical assessments presented in Logic and Arguments to one of the criticisms by Kazimierz Twardowski published a hundred years earlier.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

On the Paradoxes of Popper's Falsificationism

63%
Szlachcic K.
Filozofia Nauki
|
2003
|
vol. 11
|
issue 2
117-128
PL
  
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.