Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Język Polski
|
2022
|
vol. 102
|
issue 2
107-116
PL
Artykuł przedstawia genezę Słownika współczesnego języka polskiego, najważniejsze innowacje leksykograficzne zastosowane w tym dziele, przebieg prac, kolejne wydania i wersje. Omawia on także wpływ tego słownika na inne dzieła leksykograficzne, a także ukazuje jego znaczenie dla rozwoju kadr leksykograficznych.
EN
The notion of the morphological knot appeared when modern language forms were interpreted from the historical point of view. The author supports the arguent that in strictly synchronic interpretation this notion is irrelevant. Such structures as; boski, pirack-i to which, traditionally, the morphological knot is ascribed, can be interpreted with the use of adequate morphological principles: cf. - bosk-i - bo(g-sk-i bo-sk-i (shortening by the phoneme o) ; piracki » pirat-k-i — pirac-k-i (consonant shift t : c) ; s or pira/t-ck-i -* pira-ck-i (shortened by the phoneme t).
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dialektologia a socjolingwistyka

100%
EN
The paper starts with a presentation of circumstances under which dialectology developed in the 2nd half of the 19th century. The growth of sociolinguistics dates back to the turn of the 50's and 60’s of the 20th century. The dialectological research methods have been of little usf for sociolinguists. On the other hand the methods developed in sociolinguistics may be applied in dialectology. In the first place much more attention should be given to the hierarchical (social) differentiation of peasant cosnunities. A desciption should include not only age but also such factors as sex, jobs in town, or social status. Secondly, a research of the situationally conditioned variability should be introduced, aiming at the determination of the degree to Which the official (as opposed to unofficial) situation contributes to the repression of dialectal forms by their literary equivalents in the process of speech.The concluding, part of the article is devoted to a description of the methods of Such research.
EN
The aim of the article is to assess the English borrowings from the viewpoint of linguistic correctness. Determining if a given borrowing is needed or redundant is based on two criteria: sufficiency and economy. The analysis showed that a majority of the lexical borrowings are needed, because it names new objects and phenomena. There are, however, forms, which are redundant, e.g. lewel instead of poziom, progres instead of postęp, look instead of wygląd. The borrowing is also justified when the borrowed word experiences a change in meaning in Polish, e.g. event // wydarzenie, zdarzenie, hejt // nienawiść, is differently stylistically marked than their Polish equivalent, e.g. tabloid // brukowiec or becomes a euphemism, e.g. aborcja // przerywanie ciąży. Some semantic calques are unnecessary, such as filozofia, dedykować. The structural-semantic calques, presenting the complexity of English structure by familiar elements, e.g. political correctness > poprawność polityczna generally do not raise any concerns about their correctness. However, connecting two nouns in the Nominative case, where the first noun serves as a modifier, is generally considered wrong, e.g. Miłosz Festiwal instead of Festiwal Milosza.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.