Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

The notion of ‘undermining the internal market’ and its legal meaning

100%
Malaga M.
Przegląd Zachodni
|
2019
|
issue 2 (371)
79-93
EN
The paper aims at establishing the meaning of the notion of ‘undermining the internal market’. It is not only a general notion of EU law, but also a specific, negative condition for employing enhanced cooperation procedure in European Union law. The problem is significant for both theoretical and practical reasons. Firstly, it concerns the proper method of interpretation of the notion in question – especially when we consider the fact that in case law, the Court of Justice of the EU relies solely on arguments of economic (pragmatic) nature and does not employ any methods of legal interpretation. Secondly, the proper method of interpretation of the notion of „undermining the internal market” may lead to the conclusion that enhanced cooperation is not allowed in certain situations. To deal with the issue, we briefly present the procedure of enhanced cooperation with its hitherto adoptions in the EU law. We also analyse the Court’s case-law on these adoptions, with an emphasis on the interpretation of the notion of ‘undermining the internal market’. Having done this, we suggest another method of interpretation of the discussed notion. Against such a background, the suggested method is confronted with the system of unitary patent protection being introduced in the internal market through the enhanced cooperation procedure.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rozszerzona skuteczność wyroków SOKiK w sprawach dotyczących klauzul niedozwolonych. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 12 lutego 2014 r., sygn. akt III SK 18/13

63%
Gutkowski P., Malaga M.
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
|
2014
|
vol. 3
|
issue 9
108-120
PL
W niniejszej glosie komentowany jest wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 12 lutego 2014 r. (sygn. III SK. 18/13), w którym to odniósł się do problemu rozszerzonej skuteczności wyroków SOKiK uznających postanowienia wzorca umowy za niedozwolone. Sąd Najwyższy opowiedział się za stanowiskiem, zgodnie z którym wyrok stwierdzający abuzywność danej klauzuli, na podstawie którego wpisywana jest ona do rejestru prowadzonego przez Prezesa UOKiK, nie wiąże przedsiębiorcy, który nie brał udziału w postępowaniu przed SOKiK. Autorzy glosy podjęli próbę krytycznej analizy wskazanego rozstrzygnięcia. W glosie wskazano argumenty znajdujące podstawę zarówno w prawie unijnym, jak i krajowym, które przemawiają za koniecznością stosowania szerokiej wykładni pojęcia rozszerzonej skuteczności wyroków SOKiK
EN
In this case note we comment the Polish Supreme Court’s judgment issued on 12 February 2014 which deals with an issue of extended effect of judgments by District Court of Warsaw – Court for Competition and Consumer Protection (hereinafter: District Court). In these judgments contract terms used by entrepreneurs may be declared unfair and abusive. The Supreme Court supported the view, according to which a judgment declaring unfairness of a contract term – on the basis of which this term is entered into a register of unfair contract terms – does not bind entrepreneur who was not a party to proceedings in the District Court. The authors of this contribution disapprove of such approach. In this case note we provide arguments, deriving both from EU and Polish law, that support the necessity of adopting a wide approach towards interpretation of an issue of extended effect of judgments of the District Court.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.