Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The aim of the article is to present leading theoretical considerations in the field of internationalization of anti-crisis management mechanisms. The internationalization of legal orders has become a fait accompli in the last decades. Pessimists, who in this context conclude the end of the nation-state, believe that such processes inevitably mean the destruction of state legal orders. The intensification of legislative efforts takes place especially in a crisis situation, when re-regulating in various sectors of the integrated market is to be a remedy preventing future crises and stabilizing existing disorders in a specific area of the economy. Legal theorists look at these changes more optimistically, analyzing the interaction between various normative systems in the international environment. The research problem concerns the necessity of normative solutions within the internationalized normative and institutional framework in a crisis situation. The basic research hypotheses concern: (a) the desirability of regulatory actions at the supranational / international level; (b) the inclusion of the Europeanized administrative law, which serves e.g. stabilizing markets, into the processes of legal globalization; (c) understanding the legitimacy of the activities of legislative bodies in the context of shaping a pluralistic / cosmopolitan normative order. The article is a theoretical analysis of the conceptual network used in the doctrine of European law.
EN
In today’s globalized world, individuals develop many complementary identities, resulting from their participation in the life of concurrently existing social groups. Ethnic, regional or cultural are among the collective identities that play an important role in human life. Collective identities are built within a specific community that develops a sense of belonging by sharing within the given social group a set of common values, ideals, views, needs, or interests. It is difficult to build such a sense of belonging within the institutionalized structures that ultimately seek to legitimize their existence and action through controlled and normative ways of constructing a common identity. Such phenomena can be observed for several decades within the European Union, which, through a multi-level governance system, seeks to build a European identity that is a derivative of the integration process.
EN
The constructivist approach is among the most popular in the international relations and particularly useful in the analysis of the European integration processes. It allows a broad analysis of participants’ preferences, motives and interests in international cooperation. States and international organizations develop collective identities within processes of communication and deliberation. Constructivism helps to understand those processes and their infl uence on making and developing international law. Constructivism is also used as a legitimizing approach, especially in the context of difficulties in the validation of the activities of international institutions at the supranational level. It offers alternative concepts to the traditionally understood democratic legitimacy
|
2016
|
vol. 5
|
issue 2
56-69
PL
Przedmiotem publikacji jest zagadnienie „agencyfikacji” europejskiej przestrzeni administracyjnej. Problem wzrostu liczby europejskich urzędów regulacyjnych, tzw. agencji zdecentralizowanych został poddany analizie przez pryzmat ich autonomii instytucjonalnej. Z ponad trzydziestu gremiów tego typu jako przykład posłużyła Europejska Agencja Bezpieczeństwa Lotniczego, która dysponuje szerokim katalogiem uprawnień o charakterze decyzyjnym i quasi-regulacyjnym.
EN
The paper analyzes problems connected with the processes of “agencification” identified in the European administrative space. The growing number of European regulators, especially decentralized agencies, is analyzed through the prism of their evolving institutional autonomy. From more than thirty such bodies existing in the EU, the Author chose to focus on the example of the European Aviation Safety Agency, which has a wide catalogue of decision-making and quasi-regulatory powers.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.