Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Pluralism of values in contemporary law and possibility of their cognition

100%
Škop M.
Przegląd Prawa i Administracji
|
2012
|
vol. 90
109-117
PL
Przedmiotem rozważań autora jest pochodzenie wartości w różnych systemach prawnych oraz możliwość ich poznania. Systemów prawnych nie można oddzielić od wartości, które tworzą istot­ną część prawa. Prawo nie jest prostym kodem, w którym wszystko jest bezpośrednio związane ze znaczeniem lub wartościami, prawo jest raczej językiem. Jakkolwiek poszczególne wartości nie mogą być określone przez normy prawne, to normy te nie mogą istnieć bez wartości. Działanie prawa pozbawionego wartości autor porównuje do machiny opisanej przez Franza Kafkę. Ani nauka prawa, ani praktyka nie podążają za jedną tylko metodologią poszukiwania wartości, lecz stosują raczej metodologiczny pluralizm.
2

“Preferred Reading” of Legal Texts

100%
Škop M.
Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
|
2015
|
vol. 5
|
issue 1
95-103
3

Milan Kundera and Franz Kafka - How Not to Forget Everydayness

100%
Škop M.
Creative and Knowledge Society
|
2011
|
vol. 1
|
issue 2
110-119
EN
Purpose of the article is to show that while in fundamental constitutional questions we are still attentive to our past, in everyday legal cases we can forget more likely. In my opinion, in case of the post-communist countries it is very dangerous to forget the Past because we have nothing other than our memories. To forget means either to be exposited the danger of return to the system as it was or to transform our legal praxis into a depersonalized system.Methodology/Methods In this article I want to analyze two decisions of Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic and compare them with situation described in early works of Milan Kundera (The Joke; The Book of Laughter and Forgetting). His work reflecting the past everydayness in communist Czechoslovakia can be used as a good example of the analyses of forgetting. Very similar inspirations we can find in work of Franz Kafka (The Trial) or even better in Milan Kundera's interpretation of Kafka's work. The scientific aim of this article is to show that although the literature represents different conception of knowledge when this knowledge is compared with legal knowledge we can gain parallels that describe the law rooted in culture and society.Conclusions of this article show that on one side we face reminding of our Past in decisions regarding politically considerable cases. On the other side we face the oblivion: In cases at constitutional level dealing with everydayness in legal praxis we can find rather shift to formal interpretation without any reference to our past. The result can be Kafkaesque legal system without any signs of living people.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Law and Literature – a Meaningful Connection

100%
Škop M.
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna
|
2015
|
vol. 4
|
issue 1
6-20
EN
The connection between law and (imaginative) literature can still affect surprisingly. The theme of the present article is to summarize some of the basic features of the movement, which is called „Law and Literature” and to suggest some starting-points with which it is associated. These starting points include, for instance linguistic conception of law, narratology in law or the relations between law and culture. The article offers an overview of the classical approaches connecting law and literature and mentions the reasons for this connection: e.g. cultivation of law and lawyers, improvement of judicial decisions or improvement of legal interpretation. Some of the findings resulting from the joint of law and literature can be used in practice and goes beyond „mere” theory. The article is to be seen as an introduction to the movement of „Law and Literature”, presentation of ideas on which this movement is based and offering the possibility of its further development.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Philosophical Approach to the Statutory Drafting

100%
Škop M.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
|
2020
|
vol. 92
51-60
PL
Artykuł bada związki pomiędzy procesem stanowienia prawa a narracjami. Niewątpliwie, proces tworzenia ustaw jest kwestią konstytucyjną, ale Konstytucja porządkuje jedynie fragment tego procesu. Konstytucja, czy też inne ustawy, nie regulują części procesu legislacyjnego wdrażanego przez rząd (głównie w fazie wstępnej), jakkolwiek jest on ważny i wpływa na pozostałe jego etapy. Działanie rządu jawi się tu jako sfera nieformalnych regulacji ukrytych przed kontrolą społeczeństwa. W artykule bada się znaczenie biurokratycznych elementów procesu stanowienia prawa, kładąc nacisk na podejście narracyjne: to narracje uzasadniają prawodawstwo. Powstaje pytanie, jak możemy przezwyciężyć dualizm narracyjny – jeden determinowany interesami globalnej wspólnoty, drugi interesami poszczególnych państw?
EN
This article traces the relationship between the law-making process and narratives. Undoubtedly, how statutes are created is a constitutional question, yet the Constitution regulates only part of this process. Constitution or any statute does not regulate parts of the legislative process implemented by the government (mostly preliminary phases). However, they are important and influence the remaining parts of the law-making process. This government’s activity is the sphere of informal regulation hidden from the primary control of the public. This article explores the importance of the bureaucratic elements of the law-making process with emphasis on a narrative approach: narratives justify legislature. How can we overcome the two lines of narratives – one produced by global capital and the other represented by national experience?
6
Content available remote

Právo a literatura : brněnská spojení

51%
Škop M., Smejkalová T., Štěpáníková M.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2019
|
vol. 158
|
issue 1
67-85
EN
Law and Literature movement belongs among today’s critical legal-philosophical movements. This movement springs out from idea that law can be treated as a language, including its literary form. Therefore, it understands the law as a cultural artifact that can be subjected to the same or comparable research as any other literary text. At present, this approach mainly operates with methods that can help general legal methodology and specific methodology the interpretation of legal texts. The article “Law and Literature: Brno connection” focuses on the description of the movement, with an emphasis on the current trends in the field (which have its origin and context, which can not be overlooked), especially taking into account the direction of “Law as Literature” and taking into account the possibility of adapting this direction to the Czech legal environment. The article focuses on the possibilities of using literary interpretation in law (context analysis, including overinterpretation, audience analysis, narratology) and the potential effects of literature on law (persuasion, cultivation). Deeper interest in this issue is evident at the Faculty of Law of Masaryk University so this research institute cannot be passed over. The article therefore represents the findings realized at Brno Faculty as the most prominent workplace in this field and shows the existing research findings in this segment of law examination.
CS
Law and Literature (Právo a literatura) řadíme mezi současná kritická právněfilosofická hnutí. Vychází z představy práva jako jazyka, který může mít i literární podobu, a chápe proto právo jako kulturní artefakt, který může být podroben stejnému či srovnatelnému zkoumání jako jakýkoli jiný literární text. V současnosti tento přístup operuje zejména s metodami, které mohou napomoci právní metodologii obecně, nebo přímo napomoci metodám interpretace právních textů. Článek se proto soustředí na popis hnutí s důrazem na současné trendy v této oblasti (které však mají svůj původ a svůj kontext, což nelze pominout), zejména s přihlédnutím k směru „Právo jako literatura“ a s přihlédnutím na možnosti adaptace tohoto směru na české právní prostředí. Soustředí se proto na možnosti využití literární interpretace v právu (analýza kontextu, včetně nadinterpretace, analýza publika, naratologie) a vůbec potenciální vlivy literatury na právo(přesvědčování, kultivace). Hlubší zájem o tuto problematiku je patrný na Právnické fakultě Masarykovy univerzity. Článek proto představuje dosavadní zjištění učiněné na brněnské fakultě jako pracovišti s nejvýraznějším postupem v této oblasti a ukazuje dosavadní badatelská zjištění v tomto segmentu zkoumání práva.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.