The paper argues that Davidson’s thesis of the anomalous character of mental life is a natural supporter for McGinn’s anti-constructive naturalism. In the first two parts of the article I discuss both positions. In the third I will try to show similarities and differences between them and the way in which anomalous monism can support McGinns theory.
The paper is a critical reaction to Marcin Trepczyński article „Thomas Aquinas Non-Monotonically” (Filozofia Nauki 2/2011). It is shown that the author misunderstood the real forms of Thomas Aquinas reasoning. I present arguments which show why these reasonings are monotonic by analyzing some of the examples which Trepczyński is using to justify the opposite thesis.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.