Search results

1

Философские стратегии в критическом тексте Акима Волынского. К постановке проблемы

100%

Раковская Н.

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis | Studia Russologica

|

2019

|

issue 12

PL

Философские стратегии в критическом тексте Акима Волынского. К постановке проблемы Резюме В статье рассматривается система ценностных ориентиров Ак. Волынского. Делается акцент на ряде парадоксальных суждений критика, обусловленных противоречивостью его мировидения и незавершенностью критической системы в целом. Рассматриваются полемические концепции критика, нашедшие отражение в его оценках литературной критики 60-х гг. ХІХ в. и декаданса. Ключевые слова: интеллектуал, критическая рефлексия, кризисное сознание, модель мира Philosophical Strategies in the Critical Text of Akim Volynsky. To the Setting of the Problem Abstract The article analyses the system of valuable reference points of Akim Volynsky. The emphasis is placed on a number of the paradoxical judgments of the critic caused by discrepancy of his world model and incompleteness of a critical system in general. The polemic concepts of the critic are considered which found reflection in its estimates of literary criticism of the 60th of XX of century and a decadence. Key words: intellectual, critical reflection, crisis consciousness, world model

2

Авторские миры в критическом дискурсе конца ХІХ – начала ХХ веков

100%

Раковская Н.

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis | Studia Russologica

|

2018

|

issue 11

RU

Авторские миры в критическом дискурсеконца ХІХ – начала ХХ вековВ статье актуализируется парадоксальность критического мышления Л. Шестова, об-условленная его концепцией мировидения и афористичностью письма. Делается ак-цепт на парадоксальных суждениях критика о русской литературе.Ключевые слова: индивидуальность, авторский мир, критика, парадоксальность,дискурс, экзистенциалThe Author’s Worlds in a Critical Discourseof the End of ХІХ and the Beginnings of the XX CenturiesIn article the paradoxicality of critical thinking of L. Shestov is staticized caused by his conceptof a worldseeing and aphoristic nature of the letter. The acceptance is made on paradoxicaljudgments of the critic about the Russian literature.Key words: identity, the author’s world, criticism, paradoxicality, discourse, existential

3

Лев Шестов. Дилемма знания и веры

100%

Раковская Н.

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis | Studia Russologica

|

2017

|

issue 10

RU

Abstract In the article the religious philosophical and literary approaches of L. Shestov to the Russian literature are updated. The metaphysical discourse of literary criticism is learned. L. Shestov's paradoxical that caused by world seeing of the critic and his author's model of the world is also noted. Emphasized the preference of literature as a subject of philosophical reflection of L. Shestov. The essence of ideas of L. Shestov is in definition of existential in art texts. The philosophy is based on rational thinking, absolute and general rules, but revelation of the artist is learned only by personal experience and opening of divine. The world of art creativity is defined by «the writer's arbitrariness»: his intuition and work. In article is specified that interpretation of theological, philosophical, literary texts allows to name the literary criticism of L. Shestov not only philosophical and esthetic, existential, but also to talk about an integrity of his model. Monothematic of the critic is confirmed by system of the repeating motives and key-notes, intertextual elements. In this regard it is possible to speak about concentric circles, peculiar repetitions in L. Shestov's style and about his manner to put ques-tions, without giving answers. Moreover, in his questions the negative connotation is obvious and as a result there is «an open philosophical field» for reflections. As in most cases L. Shestov borrows quotes from primary sources, adding own translation and exact data about a source, there is an impression that they play a role of proofs and scientific knowledge. However L. Shestov categorically against such knowledge, therefore, contradiction which it is possible to call paradox of his discourse is once again raised. Key words: criticism, a paradoxical, a discourse, existential.

Refine search results

3 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis | Studia Russologica

3 Раковская Н.

1 2019

1 2018

1 2017

Философские стратегии в критическом тексте Акима Волынского. К постановке проблемы

Авторские миры в критическом дискурсе конца ХІХ – начала ХХ веков

Лев Шестов. Дилемма знания и веры