Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The main goals of the paper is to identify the Slovak translation variants of the English term „digital humanities“ and, subsequently, to summarize the translatological strategies which are implemented in using the translation variants. In a number of non-English speaking countries it is common to use the original English term „digital humanities“ or its abbreviation DH. There is a discussion held in those countries as to how to translate this neologism (and whether to translate it at all), and it is considered necessary to open the discussion in the national academic environment, too. What is problematic in the discussion is the contradiction between the effort to systematically develop the particular national terminology and the difficulty to translate the expression exactly and accurately. This contradiction is shown in the national terminology environment by the intention to strictly translate „digital humanities“ into Slovak (most often as „digitálne humanitné vedy“) and by an opposite tendency to keep the term in the original English version. It is believed that mapping of the existing Slovak translations of the term and explanation of the arguments which can support the use of them may help open and productively steer the translatological discussion.
2
100%
World Literature Studies
|
2016
|
vol. 8
|
issue 3
104 – 114
EN
The aim of the paper is to clarify the interdisciplinary and methodological nature of the relationship between philosophy and the digital humanities. The examination process consists of an analysis of five modes of engagement of IT and humanities elaborated by Svensson and of their specifications in terms of digital research in philosophy. Firstly, we introduce the issue of digital humanities and their definitions; then we define Svensson’s modes of engagement of IT and humanities (IT as a tool, study object, expressive medium, experimental laboratory, activist venue); and we exemplify each of them with digital philosophical projects and their methodological assumptions (the first mode is analysed in detail). The intention is to offer a systematic overview of the relationship between philosophy and the digital humanities.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2009
|
vol. 64
|
issue 4
362-368
EN
The paper tries to shed light on the philosophical consequences of the concept of rhizome, employed by G. Deleuze and F. Guattari. At the same time it shows that the concept could contribute to the philosophical discussion of the city, architecture and urbanism problematic.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2011
|
vol. 66
|
issue 5
447-451
EN
The paper offers a brief outline of the presuppositions and consequences of modern urbanism, as well as of its ontology. The stress is put on the historical transformations of the modern rationality and on depicting its efforts in carrying out its project.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2010
|
vol. 65
|
issue 4
361-365
EN
The paper gives an analysis of the conceptions of rationality of two influential representatives of the 20th century theory of urbanism, and their philosophical grounds. It also outlines the problem of modern rationality, questions its character and points out, that for the time being the transition to a new way of thinking is problematic.
EN
The article is localized at the intersection of digital curation, archival studies, digital humanities, and the documentation practice in ethnology. The primary aims are: 1. to analyse the five selected principles of conceptual preparation and practical building of digital research collections; 2. to exemplify these principles on the concept and strategy of digital conversion and computer processing of the ethnological Collection of research reports (CRR) at the Institute of Ethnology and Social Anthropology SAS; 3. to evaluate and to comment on the selected principles of research collections based on CRR exemplification. The first aim includes defining essential terms, principles analysis (principle of development policy, description, digital curation, and contextual mass, and scholarly contribution) and highlighting the specificity of thematic research collections. The second aim involves in-depth exemplifying conceptual, methodological, curatorial, and practical processes through which CRR becomes a digital research collection. The third aim includes a retrospective evaluation of problematic aspects of selected principles from the point of view of the CRR example. The article’s contribution will be to improve the knowledge of professionals in ethnology about the theoretical foundations and curatorial management of digital research collections.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.