Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
'Fall into the Return of Domestication in the World'. About Romanticism Philosophy as the Philosophy of the Way of Life (Critique References into Friedrich Nietzsche's Theory) In this dispute, author defends romanticism era against perception, which is focus on inclination to irrational forms of being and also different kind of forms, which are connected with mythic, contra-realistic and escapist way of thinking. Moreover, in the main these, he is going to engage in polemics with Friedrich Nietzsche's criticism of romanticism era, who proposes this stream into the western reduction with historical and philosophical ( romanticism as 'impoverishment life', despair mood, pessimism, decadence) aspect. Author makes a trial, in which he uses philosophers such as Schlegel and Novalis, who are main representatives of German romanticism era. In the next volume, essay shows a trial, that it is possible treat romanticism not only as speculative philosophy, but also philosophy, which creates 'philosophy of the way of life', even more - philosophy of the art's life in the world where is no wizardry. It can let to see some kind of project, which is found as a existential project. That is why in the next analyze it is possible to see, that beyond many aims of this project, one is meaningful: cast a spell on the world, in a way, in which human being once again could feels like home, feels like homeland. Author has convinced, through the romanticism's creators, there can find a lot of ways, which will cross Nietzsche. On the other hand, when we talk about Novalis and Schlegel, there is noticeable care of constructive individualism, which is a reference in to the whole existence. This consideration - author has suggested - shows, that romanticists has tried to find a solution, in which they has chose interpretation space at first. Novalis and Schlegel's creativity, there are many strategies, but mainly - these are - romanticism and mythology influential process, especially concentrates on the world aspect. Moreover, when they talk about the world aspect, they use specific irony, magnify the world by special power and show, that world is blessed by 'love touch', what is very important, because then, it is possible to feel likes home once again.
PL
Celem artykułu jest ukazanie, w jaki sposób można odnosić diagnozy i troski teorii krytycznej do uczenia się i nauczania dorosłych, a w szczególności jak teorie uczenia się dorosłych można rozbudowywać w świetle kierunkowych idei Szkoły Frankfurckiej. Naczelna diagnoza powtarzana w artykule mówi, iż pedago- giczna idea całożyciowego uczenia się podziela dziś los każdego innego podsyste- mu edukacji: jest w coraz większej mierze zagarniana przez neoliberalną ideologię fundamentalizmu rynkowego, traktującego uczenie się jako źródło ekonomicznego postępu oraz klucz do konsumpcyjnego uczestnictwa w napędzaniu gospodarki, i dlatego całkowicie pozbawiającego je jego publicznego, etycznego i emancypacyj- nego znaczenia. Warunkiem wstępnym owego uczestnictwa jest, całkiem po prostu, akceptacja – zdolność jednostki do przystosowania się do istniejącego stanu rze- czy. Teoria krytyczna ukazana tu jest jako narzędzie pozwalające głębiej zrozumieć współczesny fenomen hegemonii rozumu instrumentalnego. Spożytkowana pedago- gicznie daje możliwość uwrażliwiania uczących się dorosłych na desubiektywizujące oddziaływania władzy i ideologii oraz zachęca ich do rozwijania emancypacyjnej podmiotowości zorientowanej na budowanie autonomicznej biografii, a także obronę świata życia i przestrzenie społeczeństwa obywatelskiego przed intruzją etyki rynku oraz biurokratycznej racjonalności.
EN
The paper aims to illuminate the ways we can connect the concerns of critical theory to adult learning and teaching and how, in particular, adult learning theory can be reframed in the light of critical theory. The diagnosis reiterated here is that the pedagogical idea of lifelong learning is currently partaking the lamentable fate of all the other sub-systems of education: it is increasingly being subsumed under the neoliberal ideology of market fundamentalism which sees learning as a vehicle to economic progress and to consumptionist participation in the economy and thus strips learning of its public, ethical and emancipatory significance. The main precondition of this participation is, simply, acceptance – the individual’s ability to c o n f o r m to the existing state of things. This essay is an attempt to show how critical theory can help us understand the present domination of the instrumental reason, guide adult learners in unmasking the workings of power and ideology, and instigate them to develop an emancipatory subjectivity, capable of resisting the prevalent spirit of market fundamentalism and oriented towards building an autonomous biography, at the same time defending the human life-world and civil society against the intrusion of capitalist ethics, market forces, and bureaucratic rationality.
EN
The Issue of Culture in Modernity: On What May, and What May Not Be Seen from the Olympus (A Dispute with Lech Witkowski) Our essay is a polemic with Lech Witkowski’s philosophy of culture; with his thinking about the essence of the era known as “modernity,” and with the role he assigns to the education and the individually designed spiritual development, conceived of as a search for encounters with cultural authority. By analyzing a number of key themes touched upon in the work of the author of the “Saga of Authorities” and by watching how his central concepts and assumptions operate, we make a series of critical statements of which the common denominator is our suspicion that Lech Witkowski’s theory of culture is too elitist in nature. Moreover, we criticize his paradoxically conservative reaction to the progress of modernity which not only removes the traditional divisions between higher and lower culture, but which above all imposes a necessity to “get one’s hands dirty” through the confrontation with the system of education (including teachers at all levels of education), which imposes the necessity to face the ambivalence (in the sense of understanding the irreversibility of the simultaneous ending of the old and opening of the new ways of being in culture) of the new world and a new type of man characterized by mass syndrome.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.