Results found: 2

Search results

Sort By:

Limit search:

Carole Pateman o dochodzie podstawowym

100%

Guczalska K.

Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje

2017

issue 37(2)

15-32

W artykule przedstawiono ideę bezwarunkowego dochodu podstawowego w uję ciu Carole Pateman. Jej stanowisko zostało porównane z koncepcją dochodu podstawowego Bru- ce'a Akcermana/Anne Alstott oraz Philippe Van Parijsa. Artykuł rekonstruuje argumenty Pateman, które dowodzą przewagi jej stanowiska. Konkurencyjne koncepcje dochodu podstawowego charakteryzują się brakiem konsekwencji wywodu oraz krótkowzrocznością w odniesieniu do tematu feminizmu. Novum koncepcji Pateman polega na powią zaniu dochodu podstawowego z procesem demokratyzacji oraz emancypacją kobiet (demokratyzacja powinna dotyczyć również sfery gospodarstwa domowego). W artykule zostało również omówione zagadnienie free riders oraz kontynuacja myśli Pateman dokonana przez Michaela Goodharta.

The article presents an idea of unconditional basic income as proposed by Carole Pateman. Her viewpoint has been compared to the concept of basic income of Bruce Akcerman/Anne Alstott and Philippe Van Parijs. The article reconstructs Pateman's arguments which prove the superiority of her stance. Competitive concepts (of basic income) are characterised by the lack of reasoning consistency and short-sightedness in relation to the topic of feminism. The novelty of Pateman's idea consists in establishing the connection between the basic income and the process of democratisation and emancipation of women (democratisation should also concern the sphere of a household). The article also discusses the issue of free riders and the continuation of Pateman's thoughts by Michael Goodhart.

Amartya Sen o prawach człowieka

100%

Guczalska K.

Analiza i Egzystencja. Czasopismo Filozoficzne

2014

issue 28

37 - 72

The article discusses the idea of ‘human rights’ and the Amartya Sen’s reflections on that topic. By assumption, Sen does not present a catalogue of human rights, yet he claims that the language of human rights can be used to talk about the so-called human capabilities (the main concept of Sen’s theory). The aporia that exists in the current paradigm of human rights consists in the fact that it has been based on a few (liberal) foundations, while, on the other hand, it has been extended into a broad system of individual rights/entitlements conflicting with their foundation. Each of those systems of rights entails a specific vision of social life. The liberal tradition postulates the existence of a minimal state, which guards freedom, life and property. In the leftist tradition, in contrast, there is postulated the existence of a welfare state, which satisfies people’s ever growing needs, based on an extensive bureaucracy and high taxes – under the patronage of the idea of social justice. Those social visions cannot be reconciled – they lead to conflicts. In this text, I present the problem of inconsistency and tension within the ‘human rights’, contrasting Amartya Sen’s theory with classical liberalism of John Locke. I claim that assessment of the contemporary ‘human rights’ theory should depend on whether a given theory is capable of proper determination and – at least to some extent – solving the problem of incoherence and tensions present in the Western ‘human rights’ paradigm. It seems that Sen’s conception cannot meet that challenge.

Refine search results

1 Analiza i Egzystencja. Czasopismo Filozoficzne

1 Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje

2 Guczalska K.

1 2017

1 2014

Search results

Carole Pateman o dochodzie podstawowym

Amartya Sen o prawach człowieka