Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the paper the novel Tre metri sopra il cielo and its Polish translation are analyzed. Different values of the indices of lexical richness of the Italian and the Polish text lead to the further analysis of stereotyped expressions in Moccia’s novel and in the Polish translation. Comparing the most frequent expressions in the semiautomated manner you discover that to every Italian expression, often repeated, correspond several Polish translations. These solutions are classified in Berman’s terms as nobilitation. In parallel, we try to justify the translators’ choice of nobilitation as adequate in case of paraliterature.
IT
L’analisi riguarda il romanzo di Tre metri sopra il cielo in italiano e la sua traduzione polacca. Partendo dal differente valore degli indici di ricchezza lessicale nel prototesto e nel testo tradotto viene analizzata la resa in polacco di espressioni stereotipate selezionate con il metodo semiautomatico. L’analisi rivela che alle ripetizioni di Moccia nella traduzione polacca corrispondono piu soluzioni lessicali. In base all’analitica della traduzione di Berman esse vengono interpretate come casi di nobilitazione. Oltre a interpretarlo si cerca di giustificare il ricorso alla nobilitazione nel caso della paraletteratura.
PL
This paper investigates the language of the vernacular version of Lanfranco’s Chirurgia parva in the manuscript Ital. Quart. 67 kept at the Jagiellonian Library in Krakow. The brief description of the linguistic traits leads to the determination of the place of origin of the manuscript. From the initial idea that the manuscript was made in Northern Italy, through the examination of orthographic, phonetic, morphologic and lexical features, I arrive at the conclusion that the codex must have been written in Veneto, and more precisely in central Veneto, maybe in or near Padua. The language itself may be described as the expression of the “koiné di terraferma”, a very characteristic Venetian variety of the 15th century that combined local and Tuscan characteristics.
PL
Errors due to interferences in writings of Polish students (intermediate and advanced level). Corpus based research This corpus-based research attempts at presenting errors of Polish intermediate and advanced students that can be found in Gran VALICO corpus. Only errors due to linguistic interference were taken into account. They were considered at the morphological, syntactic and lexical levels. Although interference is mostly present in the initial stage of language learning, some persistent errors were found also in writings with high overall evaluation. The problems involve, among others, use of ‘congiuntivo’ and ‘condizionale composto’, auxiliary verbs, spatial deictics and various types of the so-called false friends. It is also argued that corpus-based approach with a morphosyntactically annotated corpus is much more effective for managing linguistic data and sometimes reveals unexpected interference patterns.
PL
In the paper we deal with the development of Latin possessive suus and with changes in use of the possessive from Latin to Italian. Citing examples from the Latin classical literature we demonstrate the inconsistencies and weaknesses of the grammar system that led to incoherent use of the linguistic forms and to consequent changes in the system itself. By analyzing sentences chosen mostly Caesar’s works we reached the conclusion that in Latin had not existed specialized pronominal forms employed exclusively in the oratio obliqua structures. Suus, se, sibi were used in order to establish referential identity of different elements which resulted in co-occurrence of identical forms that pointed to completely different referents. The evolution of the language in the 6th century abolished the difference between reflexive and pronominal form (classical Latin suus and eius). Such shift was a result of the incoherent employment of those forms in the oratio obliqua. At first, that usage was context-depending, then it was extended to become general and normative, which led to disappearing of the diversification between reflexive and pronominal forms.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.