Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Przepisy dotyczące chowu zwierząt w większych miastach Polski przedrozbiorowej

100%
Zajęcki M.
Studia z Dziejów Państwa i Prawa Polskiego
|
2007
|
vol. 10
105-125
PL
1. Chów zwierząt w miastach jako przedmiot badań historii gospodarczej i społecznej. 2. Chów zwierząt w miastach jako przedmiot badań historii prawa. 3.1. Przywileje monarsze i właścicieli miast. 3.2. Powszechne prawo niemieckie. 3.3. Uchwały władz miejskich. 3.4. Prawo cechowe. 3.5. Inne źródła prawa. 4. Konkluzje.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Metafizyka prawa czy nowy program badawczy w studiach nad kodyfikacjami cesarskiego prawa chińskiego. Artykuł recenzyjny książki Jiang Yonglin, The Mandate of Heaven and The Great Ming Code

63%
Stępień M., Zajęcki M.
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej
|
2012
|
vol. 2(5)
92-100
3
Content available remote

O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część trzecia: typologia fragmentów przepisów i elementów części niezasadniczej aktów normatywnych

63%
Wróblewski B., Zajęcki M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2023
|
issue 2(175)
119-155
EN
In previously published papers (Przegląd Sejmowy no. 5(142)/2017 and 2(163)/2021) the authors proposed definitions of notions: normativity, redundancy, and uselessness of the legal text and analysed from a typological point of view the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions. In this text, the analysis has been extended to include the other elements of the legal text, i.e.: preambles, titles, subtitles, definitions in brackets, footnotes and attachments, which contain sentences and other elements (tables, equations, graphics, maps, sheet music). The terminology has also been extended to include fragments of provisions, normative acts as a whole, and plural provisions. These elements can (with some definitional amendments) be analysed in the same way as provisions using the categories: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signaled the need to complement the analysis with a theoretical and comparative perspectives: to confront the proposed theses with the leading normative and descriptive theories of legal text drafting and interpretation. The fourth part of this cycle of papers, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.
4
Content available remote

O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych. Część druga: typologia przepisów

63%
Wróblewski B., Zajęcki M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2021
|
issue 2(163)
181–221
EN
In a previously published article (Przegląd Sejmowy No. 5(142)/2017) the authors proposed definitions of the following concepts: normativity, redundancy and uselessness of a legal text. The article provides a typological review of Polish legal texts. The authors analysed the basic units of the integral (articulated) part of normative acts, i.e. legal provisions, showing their normativity, redundancy, and uselessness. The analyse includes: internal preambles, provisions describing the object and subject scope of the act, legal principles, programme and task provisions, meliorative provisions, emendations, permanently unrealisable regulations, legal definitions. The analyses led to identification of four basic types of errors in legal provisions, which were named: “doubles”, “widows”, “orphans”, and “botches”. In their closing remarks, the authors signalled the need to supplement the analysis with a description of non-integral (non-articulated) parts of normative acts. Another part of the study, devoted to these problems, is currently being prepared.
5
Content available remote

O normatywności, redundantności i zbędności przepisów prawnych

63%
Wróblewski B., Zajęcki M.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2017
|
issue 5(142)
125–141
EN
The theory of rational lawgiver entails an assumption of normativeness of legal text. The assumption can be expressed in two propositions: (1) articulated parts of legal text are normative, and (2) other parts of legal text (i.e. preambles, titles of acts, parts, chapters etc.) are not normative. Closer examination of Polish legal text shows that propositions (1)–(2) are not necessarily always true. The authors propose several defi nitions and use the enriched vocabulary to express theoretical possibility and to show real cases of non-normative fragments of articulated parts of legal texts and normative fragments of other parts of legal text. The types of normativeness are defi ned: the broadest, broad, and strict. The notion of normativeness is tightly connected with notions of redundancy and superfl uity of legal texts. The distinctions which were made in the article can be used — as the authors hint in the conclusion remarks — to expand contemporary theories of legal interpretation, and to improve the quality of lawmaking process in Poland.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.