Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 4 Filozofia (Philosophy)

Years help

  1. 1 2019

  2. 1 2017

  3. 1 2010

  4. 1 2006

Authors help

  1. 4 Leško V.

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

HEIDEGGER A PARMENIDES

100%
Leško V.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2017
|
vol. 72
|
issue 5
357 – 370
EN
Heidegger has been concerned with Parmenides throughout his lifetime. It was for him a sort of philosophical program which yielded remarkable results. During 1922 – 1973 he aimed at a closely examination of Parmenides doctrine of being which for him was the milestone of the development of the Western ontology and logic. The paper is focused on Heidegger writing Moira (1952) and his lecture Time and being. The analysis of the two should show the importance of Heidegger’s “silent conversation” with Parmenides. As a result of this analysis the author’s view is confirmed according to which Heidegger’s seeking to answer the question of being (Seinsfrage) did not yield the anticipated results. The reason is that Parmenides investigated the being of beings alone, putting aside the being itself. Heidegger’s suggestion about Parmenides being the first in Western thought who speaks about being is thus invalid. Parmenides was concerned with the existence as the one. And that is definitely not the issue of Heidegger ś interest.
2

OTÁZKA BYTIA – HEIDEGGER VERZUS HEGEL

100%
Leško V.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2019
|
vol. 74
|
issue 6
440 – 455
EN
This article investigates Heidegger՚s and Hegel՚s understanding of Being. The main focus is on Heidegger՚s late work and on his thinking conversation with Hegel. However, in Hegel՚s understanding of metaphysics there is a significant absence of the notion of being as such in its unity with the highest being, but also a desire to identify Being itself as opposed to Being of being. In Hegel՚s ontology Being exists always just as a Being of being. The ontological difference, which Heidegger aims to fill in all of his work, turns out to be the dead end of his thinking. Heidegger՚s efforts to answer the question of Being itself therefore ends in failure.
3

HEIDEGGER - NOVOVEKÁ MATEMATICKÁ PRÍRODOVEDA A METAFYZIKA

100%
Leško V.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2006
|
vol. 61
|
issue 5
347-358
EN
In Heidegger's philosophical writings on science the problematic of science occupies an important place. There are several periods in Heidegger's articulating this problem. Among the most important are the 1930s, especially his lecture 'Modern Mathematical Natural Science', which is seen by the author of the article as one of the most fundamental Heidegger's works. Divided into two main parts it examines the relationship between the mathematical and metaphysics as well as Descartes' relationship to metaphysics. In his lecture Heidegger showed himself as an excellent analytical philosopher, whose focus is not on historical-philosophical reception of modern natural science (mainly of Descartes' theory), but on an original picture of the rise of modern science and its links with the origins of modern metaphysics as a metaphysics of subjectivity. For Heidegger understanding modern science means also a deep philosophical insight into Descartes' 'Rules for the Direction of Our Native Intelligence'. And with this we have but to agree.
4

HEIDEGGER A DEJINY FILOZOFIE

100%
Leško V.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2010
|
vol. 65
|
issue 2
110-119
EN
The history of philosophy is an essential element of Heidegger's philosophy. The paper raises the question: Could Heidegger have successfully completed his 'Being and time' as he proclaimed in its first edition? In the author's view, the fact that the second part of the book remained unwritten was an inevitable consequence of the turn: The question of being in the second part of 'Being and time' remained unresolved, therefore Heidegger later focused on the understanding of being in Hegel, Leibniz, Heraclites and Parmenides. The author argues, however, that even this important re-orientation could not lead to a successful accomplishment of Heidegger's original intention. i.e. to conceive being without existence, what would have enabled him to pass on from the metaphysics of existence to the metaphysics of being.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.