Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The euro counterfeiting can be characterized as a socially negative phenomenon, one of the most serious crime, which does not has impact any more only on the interest of one country or nation, but it attacks the financial interest of whole European union. That's why the European Union protects its currency by establishing institutions designated to protect the euro as well as by its legislation. But the main responsibility for the euro protection is on the member states. The Slovak republic as a member of the European Union and a part of the Euro zone provides an appropriate protection to the euro against counterfeiting. Introducing of the euro in Slovakia on 1 January 2009 had also impact on amount and structure of counterfeits seized in our territory. Despite the increasing number of counterfeits and their quality, the situation is considered to be established nowadays. The Police Force as a part of European Union Law enforcement agencies system is able to face this problem, but the effective combat against currency counterfeiting, that is known as a transnational crime, calls for officer's new requirements in form of specific knowledge and skills. Regarding the possibilities of the prevention in this field, the warning people by media in order to encourage them to be carefully when they manipulate with cash and pay attention to be able to detect counterfeits seems to be the best option. By this behaviour of people we could keep the circulation from being overloaded by counterfeits and avoid endangering the financial interest of the European Union as well as people.
EN
The article is aimed on analysis of selected provisions of Slovak Criminal Code, especially on provision recognizing the criminal offence 'competition malpractice'. The authors deal with several uncertainties and imperfections regarding the regulation of the competition malpractice in Criminal Code. The other criminal offences concerning the competition are also the subject of this article.
EN
The authors refer to the importance of the defendant's deposition as evidence in view of the fact that the defendant has a right, but not an obligation to depose. They also refer to the importance of giving instruction to the defendant in view of the facts mentioned above. For the support of allegations and conclusions they use, among others, the comparison with Hungarian, Czech and US criminal proceedings.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.