Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Corporate Governance Theories in the New Institutional Economics Perspective. The Classification of Theoretical Concepts

100%
Klepczarek E.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2017
|
vol. 105
243-258
EN
The inter-disciplinarity and multi-paradigmatism of corporate governance issues results in a lack of clear categorization of the theories. This paper attempts to systematize theories of corporate governance with special emphasis on the new institutional economics (NIE) framework and suggests new concepts for systematization. It allows us to understand better the limitations of each theory, and thus to choose the best one in particular circumstances, as well as provide them with the best available methodology. Bringing all the theories into the paradigm of NIE makes them closer to real market conditions and enables us to use methods attributed to neo-institutional research.
PL
Interdyscyplinarność i wieloparadygmatyzm zagadnień związanych z nadzorem korporacyjnym utrudnia wskazanie jednolitej klasyfikacji teorii corporate governance. W artykule podjęto próbę usystematyzowania teorii nadzoru oraz skonfrontowania ich założeń z paradygmatem nowej ekonomii instytucjonalnej. Przeprowadzony przez autorkę przegląd podejść teoretycznych podkreśla ograniczenia każdej z zaprezentowanych koncepcji, pozwalając tym samym wybrać optymalną w określonych warunkach teorię oraz metodologię badań. Analizowane teorie zinterpretowane zostały również w świetle założeń NEI, co, w opinii autorki, zbliża je do rzeczywistych warunków, w jakich funkcjonują współczesne podmioty gospodarcze, oraz umożliwia wykorzystanie instrumentarium metodologicznego używanego w analizie neoinstytucjonalnej.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dualistyczny model poznawczy heurystyki Daniela Kahnemana i Amosa Tversky'ego

100%
Klepczarek E.
Gospodarka w Praktyce i Teorii
|
2012
|
vol. 2(31)
EN
The paper conducts the collective specification of fallacies in the perception of reality made by market participants. It is based on the Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky’s esseys and it proves that the paradigm of rationality in human behaviour is actually a purely idealistic assumption and is often not reflected in the factual decisions made by consumers. The article pointed out numerous examples of so-called heuristics and biases, which cause the wrong estimation of the probability of certain events and thus are the reason of making non-optimal choices. The studies provide the evidence that unconscious, irrational, emotional and psychological factors are crucial in decision-making situations and to make the forecasts and projections more realistic they should be taken into account in the development of econometric models, business strategies or human resources management policy.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.