Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Nauki o polityce i ich usytuowanie w systemie nauk

100%
Janusz G.
Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
|
2015
|
issue 5(36)
241-249
EN
As the political science has been assigned to new field and domain of social science in 2011 instead of being assigned to humanities, it has caused astonishment and some kind of discomfort in many centres of political science. It was similar to introducing of a new field called public policy science. Assessment of the environment was quiet diverse. As far as by the public policy science one can notice lack of interest, by the new assignment of policy science one can distinguish three contentions: inclusion of the political sciences in the domain of social science, renewed assignment of policy sciences to humanities and assignment of the political sciences to both domains (management studies alike). The third solution is the most supported one in the environment of political scientists. On the same time statements of politicians about reportedly demanded education of welders instead of political scientists and diminished interest with political studies have made the environment of policy analysis anxious. It is to be emphasised that we are not newly formed field of science and any discussions about status of our domain are an ancient history. At the present day staff of the centres of political sciences is outweighed by people, who graduated political studies and their scientific development together with their tittles of professor have been connected with investigations on the field of political studies. This way the environment grows stronger. A few dangers to political science can be pointed out. First of all there is an aspiration to autonomy of some subfields. Second, there is lack of scientific discussion in the environment. Third, there is a western technique of mechanical “scaling”, “measuring” and other ways of evaluation of one’s academic background, which does not fit to Polish reality and also pervert valuable academic backgrounds.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

PROCEDURA NIEPRAWODAWCZA W UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

100%
Janusz G.
Polityka i Społeczeństwo
|
2012
|
issue 10
41-50 (10)
XX
The entry into force of The Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009 substantially changed the terminology used in legislative (decision-making) procedures in the EU. The basic change was the introduction of the division of acts of EU secondary law into legislative and non-legislative ones. At the same time legislative procedures were further specified and described in two forms as the ordinary legislative procedure and special legislative procedure. Apart from the two legislative procedures, EU decision-making procedures should also be taken into account, which, while producing specific political and legal consequences, did not aim at the adoption of a legislative act. They are determined by both the provisions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. This type of decision-making procedure should be described as a non-legislative procedure. Decision-making mechanisms also take into account the hybrid nature of the EU and a variety of interests of the Member States with the simultaneous need for maintaining the cohesion of the European Union.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

PROCEDURY LEGISLACYJNE W UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ PO TRAKTACIE LIZBOŃSKIM

100%
Janusz G.
Polityka i Społeczeństwo
|
2011
|
issue 8
125-147 (11)
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.