Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The quality of the fiscal system could be determined as the degree of the realization of the fiscal function, in the scope of state budget's incomes and expenditures, considering some demands. Characteristics of the quality have measurable and non-measurable nature. These are especially the quality of the system; functioning, the control and the organization of the tax and insurance services, the quality of the administrative courts, profits and expenditures of the state budget. The identification of the quality characteristics and their measurements could contribute for reducing the gap between the quality offered by the fiscal system and the quality demanded by the micro enterprises. It could diminish the perceived fiscal burden, and be a useful tool in the reform of the system of the public finance.
EN
The article presents the history of the research conducted among the Venezuelan Yanomami and the controversies which arose surrounding that research towards the end of the 1980s. This is the greatest controversy in modern anthropology and one of the most serious in the whole history of the discipline. In literature this stormy discussion (which even extends beyond anthropological circles) is known as the 'Yanomami crisis'. The author argues that the reasons for the 'Yanomami crisis' can be found in earlier sources and are the result of complex interparadigmatic disputes. In addition, he presents criticisms of the work of the first Yanomamologists from the perspective of the anthropological New Criticism and, finally, he discusses the most important consequences of the crisis - both those concerning the way in which the research was carried out, the ethical standards and the way in which the anthropology of culture functions in public discourse.
EN
A presentation of the controversial 'In Sorcery's Shadow' by Paul Stoller and Cheryl Olkes - a record of Stoller's experiences with the Songhay in Niger. The author of this review formulated the thesis that Stoller's mimetic involvement in sorcery and the resultant strong emotive (and psychosomatic) reaction are the consequence of an attempt at realising a programme of eidetic (phenomenological) ethnography, outlined in his previous texts. The experiences registered by Stoller are analysed with the assistance of the conception of triple mimesis (Paul Ricoeur) and instruments applied for text analysis. Regardless of the dramaturgy of the experience itself, the case of Paul Stoller is an excellent contribution to reflections on the boundary of cognition in anthropology, and the translatability of perspectives between distinct varieties of 'Lebenswelt'. The dramatic history of the author of 'Money Has No Smell' demonstrates that an attempt at a total opening up towards local cognitive categories, the detextualisation of culture, and the assumption of 'the skin' of the Other may end in a significant deprecation of research objectives and a mimetic merge of two identities. The text is partly based on chapter V of author's Ph. D. dissertation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.