Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article formulates the author's definition and reveals the essential features of "the third way" − an alternative to the left (socialism and communism) and right (liberalism, capitalism and fascism) development models of the agrarian countries of Central and Eastern Europe, which was formulated and justified by the ideologues of agrarianism at the end of 1910s – in the 1920s. Using the example of the views of the classics of Czechoslovak (M. Hodža) and Ukrainian (V. Lypynsky) agrarianism, the common and different views of the thinkers on the theory and practice of the "third way" are clarified. It is substantiated that the ideology of agrarianism in the vision of M. Hodža and the "wheat ideology" of V. Lypynsky are almost identical phenomena in terms of their content. In both cases, their fundamental principle is the recognition of the peasantry as a force capable of creating a new, fairer social order thanks to its special social, spiritual, moral, and economic qualities. The views of M. Hodža and V. Lipynsky are similar in the issues of "agrarian democracy", defense of the economic and moral advantages of agriculture, small private ownership of land, cooperation, as well as state regulation of the economy. The essential differences in the views of the two intellectuals lie in belonging to different forms of agrarianism − radical-conservative (V. Lypynsky) and moderate, parliamentary-oriented (M. Hodža), as well as in fundamentally different approaches to the perspective of the internationalization of the agrarian movement. The thesis that the Ukrainian version of agrarianism was a self-sufficient and organic component of Central and Eastern European agrarianism received further development.
EN
Scientific research and explanation of the Ukrainian ethnogenesis of the 3rd–7th century, i.e. the social, economic and military-political life of the Ante tribal union is currently very relevant. There are several basic approaches within the scientific-historical heritage of the Ante issue formed from the second half of the 19th to the beginning of the 21st century. Some authors point to the non-Slavic origin of the Antes, other researchers justify their Slavic origin and some of researchers prove that the Antes appeared in historical sources under its own name and they are the direct ancestors of the Ukrainian nation. Despite the numerous historiographical heritages of the history of the Ante tribal union, not all questions of this scientific problem are fully and evenly explained. There are some controversial moments as well. Considering this fact, the authors of the study aim to research the Ukrainian ethnogenesis of the 3rd–7th century, i.e. socio-economic and socio-political life of the Ante tribal union. The object of the research is thus the Ante tribal union; the subject of research is the etymology of the ethnonym "Ant", the first written reports, the economic basis of the Ante tribal union and its socio-political and military organisation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.