Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Wykonywanie zadań publicznych przez muzea jako przesłanka wyłączenia ochrony prawnoautorskiej informacji o zasobach publikowanych w Internecie

100%
Drela M.
Przegląd Prawa i Administracji
|
2015
|
vol. 100
461-469
EN
The current key problem associated with access to culture is to adapt existing legislation to a new area of social life, i.e. Internet and the possibilities it offers: simple dissemination of information among the people. This problem also affected museums which in the new reality are forced to carry out their tasks using a new tool — the Internet. A large part of exhibits in public museums collections is subject to both regulations: public sector information and the copyright protection, where the third party (not a museum) is also entitled to copyrights. In the Polish legislative body, works are undertaken in order to implement the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2013/37 / EU of 26 June 2013, amending Directive 2003/98 /EC on the re-use of public sector information (i.e. the Directive re-use), ordering to share resources located in museums. In this paper the author’s aim is to analyze Art. 4 item 2) of the Polish Copyright Law in the context of exercising public tasks by public museums in the process of digitizing and making available online digitized collections. It is important to determine to what extent the current legal situation (de lege lata) allows to freely dispose of digital content created in the process of digitization by public museums. According to Art. 4 of the Polish Copyright Law the following are not subject to copyright: 1) legislative acts and their official drafts; 2) official documents, materials, signs and symbols; 3) published patent or protection; 4) simple press releases. In the opinion of the author, the content of point 2 of that Article allows to make a statement that database produced by public museum in the process of digitization of their possessions is designate of the term “official material” referred to in Art. 4 point 2 of copyright law, which allows free access to public databases online.
2

Zabytkowe części składowe i przynależności a przedmiot wpisu do rejestru zabytków – uwagi de lege lata i de lege ferenda

100%
Drela M.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2017
|
vol. 27
|
issue 3
27-46
PL
Niniejszy artykuł ma na celu analizę przepisów ustawy o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami dotyczących zabytków ruchomych w kontekście przedmiotu wpisu do rejestru zabytków według obecnie obowiązującego stanu prawego, z uwzględnieniem przepisów Kodeksu cywilnego dotyczących rzeczy ruchomych. Autorka przedstawia rozważania na temat statusu rzeczy ruchomej w prawie cywilnym jako rzeczy samoistnej, części składowej lub przynależności innej rzeczy w celu ukazania różnicy pomiędzy zabytkiem ruchomym a częścią składową zabytku nieruchomego. Obecnie rozróżnienie to jest szczególnie problematyczne w praktyce w obszarze wpisu do rejestru zabytków sztuki sakralnej stanowiącej wyposażenie lub ozdoby świątyń. Nie jest zgodna z prawem praktyka wpisywania zdobień ścian i innych płaszczyzn budynków do rejestru zabytków ruchomych, lecz należałoby je ujmować jako wyposażenie stałe zabytków nieruchomych (co dotyczy głównie świątyń) jednym wpisem – jako części składowych lub przynależności łącznie z zabytkiem nieruchomym. Sformułowane uwagi mogą być podstawą do dalszych prac legislacyjnych w zakresie propozycji treści przepisów prawnych ustawy o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami. Końcowa część artykułu dotyczy ochrony folkloru (niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego) poprzez wpis zabytków ruchomych do rejestru zabytków łącznie z zabytkiem nieruchomym jako rzeczy ruchomych stanowiących przynależności określonego miejsca.
EN
In this article the author analyses the provisions of the Polish Law on the protection of monuments and care for monuments related to movable monuments in the context of the object of registration in the register of monuments according to the current law, taking into also account provisions of the Civil Code on movable property. The author presents a discussion of the status of a movable object in civil law as a separate single item, fixtures in the building (component item), or appurtenances, in order to show the difference between a movable monument and a part of a immovable property. Currently, this distinction is particularly problematic in practice in the area of the registration of monuments of art decoration of sacred buildings (churches, temples). It is not in accordance with the Polish law The practice to enter decorations of walls and other facades of buildings into the register of movable monuments is not legitimate, instead they should be regarded as permanent facilities of immovable monuments (mainly the temples) covered with one entry – as fixtures or appurtenances of historical immovable property. The author’s remarks may serve as a basis for further legislative work on the proposal for the content of the law on the protection of monuments and the protection of monuments. The final part of the article concerns the protection of folklore (intangible cultural heritage) with the entry of movable monuments into the register of immovable monuments (buildings) as movables appurtenances belonging – due to the tradition and their function – to a particular place.
3

Historical Component Parts and Movable Appurtenances of Monuments. The Object of the Entry in the Register of Monuments – Notes De Lege Lata and De Lege Ferenda

100%
Drela M.
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
|
2017
|
vol. 27
|
issue 3 English Online Version
25-43
EN
This article seeks to analyse the provisions of the Polish Act on the protection and care of monuments related to movable monuments in the context of the object of entry in the register of monuments under the currently applicable law, taking into consideration the provisions of the Polish Civil Code related to movable things. The Author presents a discussion of the status of a movable object under civil law as a self-contained thing, a component part or appurtenance of another thing in order to show the difference between a movable monument and a component part of an immovable monument. Currently, this distinction is particularly problematic in practice regarding the registration of sacred art monuments, constituting the equipment or decorations of churches. The practice of entering wall decorations and other flat surfaces of buildings in the register of movable monuments is not consistent with the law. Instead, these should be captured as permanent equipment of immovable monuments (which applies mainly to churches) in one entry – as component parts or appurtenances attached to the immovable monument. The remarks formulated by the Author may serve as the basis for further legislative work with respect to proposed content of legal provisions of the act on the protection and care of monuments. The final part concerns the way of protecting folklore (intangible cultural heritage) by entering movable assets in the register of monuments along with an immovable monument as movable things conceived as appurtenances of a particular place.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.