Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 14

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
List of publications of Rev. Professor Joseph Życiński written since 1999.
EN
The penalty of imprisonment played above all a role of a preventive means in Poland in the 18th century. Imprisoning an accused person was to make him/her unable to run away during the trial. This way of treating the penalty of imprisonment derived to a large extent from the lack of proper places of isolation and costs of the upkeep of a prisoner. The situation changed slowly with time and the penalty of imprisonment ceased to be regarded as a preventive means exclusively, but an institution of a substantive law. The source of the investigation is above all the book of criminal cases that were dealt with between 1722 and 1791 in a magistrates’ court in Kraków. The book covers almost the whole century, which allows for a reconstruction of the court practice. Additionally, the acts of the mag- istrates’ court in Kraków from 1792—1793 which replaced the previous body were examined. The analyses of the sentences from the magistrates’ court in Kraków prove that the penalty of imprisonment was available in the 18th century. It was used in three different ways. Traditionally, the prisoner was placed in one of the two towers. With time, it was a local prison and the community home that was a proper place for serving a sentence. In the 1780s, on the basis of the legal act of Rada Nieustająca, the accused could be sent to the fortress in Kamień Podolski. Owing to an insufficient number of places adjusted to imprisonment the fortress in Częstochowa started to fulfill the function of the prison and the ones convicted by a magistrates’ court were to be found among the prisoners.
Zeszyty Naukowe KUL
|
2016
|
vol. 59
|
issue 4
53-70
EN
A conflict between relativism and fundamentalism is considered by many sociologists as one of the most important phenomena in the contemporary world. It constitutes a significant risk for peaceful coexistence in the public space. The paper presents the positions of many contemporary intellectuals (inter alia: J. Habermas, P.L. Berger, J. Ratzinger) who are looking for new solutions for social discourse which would be based on consensus and social dialogue. Moreover, this article underlines the importance of reason and religion in creating an axiological fundation essential for contemporary agora.
PL
Konflikt między relatywizmem i fundamentalizmem przez wielu socjologów uważany jest za jedno z najważniejszych zjawisk współczesności. Stanowi on zagrożenie dla pokojowego funkcjonowania przestrzeni publicznej. Autor prezentuje stanowiska współczesnych intelektualistów (J. Habermasa, P.L. Bergera, J. Ratzingera), którzy szukają nowych rozwiązań społecznego konsensusu. Artykuł ukazuje znacznie rozumu i religii w kształtowaniu fundamentu aksjologicznego istotnego dla współczesnej agory.
Zeszyty Naukowe KUL
|
2019
|
vol. 62
|
issue 4
71-90
EN
The aim of the article was to show patriotic values in the experience of Polish migrants in Great Britain. The empirical material collected using the qualitative research method using in-depth interview technique was analyzed. The material was analyzed taking into account three issues: a sense of pride in being a Pole, attitude towards the homeland and the ways of maintaining and developing Polishness. Sociological analysis has shown that in multicultural societies, changes in patriotic values occur in different directions. In some migrants, they disappear, while in others they are cultivated, discovered and even developed.
PL
Celem artykułu było ukazanie wartości patriotycznych w doświadczeniu polskich migrantów w Wielkiej Brytanii. Analizie został poddany materiał empiryczny zebrany metodą badań jakościowych przy pomocy techniki wywiadu pogłębionego. Materiał analizowany był z uwzględnieniem trzech zagadnień: poczucia dumy z bycia Polakiem, stosunku do ojczyzny oraz sposób podtrzymywania i rozwijania polskości. Socjologiczna analiza wskazała, że w społeczeństwach wielokulturowych zmiany w podejściu do wartości patriotycznych przebiegają w różnych kierunkach. U części migrantów wartości te zanikają, podczas gdy u innych są kultywowane, odkrywane i nawet rozwijane.
EN
This paper presents the use of the AHP method to assess the attractiveness of a tourism destination. The research is based on the example of six sailing tourism destinations. The analysis compared the destinations due to the attractiveness of the three types of natural attractions (diversity of the coastline, national parks and natural areas inscribed on the UNESCO list) and five types cultural attractions (objects inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List (WHL), the main centers of tourist attractions, museums and cultural events). The analysis uses six expert opinions. As a result, the hierarchy of attractiveness of the analyzed destinations has been established.
PL
W artykule zaprezentowano sposób wykorzystania metody analitycznego hierarchicznego procesu do oceny atrakcyjności destynacji turystycznej. Analizę wykonano na przykładzie sześciu destynacji żeglarskiej turystyki czarterowej. W analizie porównywano destynacje ze względu na atrakcyjność trzech rodzajów walorów naturalnych (urozmaicenie linii brzegowej, parki narodowe i obszary naturalne wpisane na listy UNESCO) i pięć rodzajów walorów kulturowych (obiekty wpisane na listę UNESCO (WHL), wielkie centra krajoznawcze, muzea oraz wydarzenia kulturalne). W analizie posłużono się opiniami sześciu ekspertów. W efekcie ustalono hierarchię atrakcyjności analizowanych destynacji.
EN
Developing a system of appeals in court proceedings, both in criminal and civil cases, is a matter of particular interest for legal reformers, especially in times of political break- throughs. Admission of a full appeal, its limitation, or lack stems from the structure of the judi- ciary. Among priority tasks of the Codification Commission of the Second Republic of Poland was designing a system of appeals that would serve best the re-established Polish state. This article highlights the commission’s deliberations during work on the first Polish code of penal proceedings and during its far-reaching amendments. It discusses the standpoints of opponents and supporters of maintaining appeals from district court rulings decided by a judicial panel. Those problems have not lost their relevance. Until this day changes in a criminal lawsuit pri- marily attempt to streamline and accelerate penal proceedings. Under changing conditions, the search continues for the correct and adequate proportions between the protection of the defend- ant’s rights and the value of discovering the truth, the need for protecting public safety, fighting increasing crime, and protecting the victim’s interests.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.