Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article presents and discusses descriptions and assessments of Ukrainians, known before also as Ruthenians, Malorosiyans (Little Russians) or Malorusiyans (Little Ruthenians), and their culture, included in Polish ethnological and anthropological literature in 19th and the beginning of 20th century. Analyzing the articles and books of that period the author focuses not only on ethnographic details but also tries to re-sketch what and how their authors were thinking and evaluating Ukrainian people and culture. He presents the whole scope of attitudes towards Ukrainians from confrontation to these aimed at understanding, cultural dialogue and reconciliation. The author is especially interested in Polish-Ukrainian cultural exchange and Polish researchers' attitudes to the process of Ukrainian national building. He analyzes works and writings of people such as Ignacy Lubicz-Czerwinski, Zorian Dolega-Chodakowski, Franciszek Ksawery Gizycki, Józef Sekowski, Waclaw Zaleski, Antoni Marcinkowski, Bernard Kalicki, Ksawery Branicki, Jan Herburt- Heybowicz, Jan Baudouin de Courtenay and Adam Fischer. This article was written in the course of author's research on Polish works focusing on Ukrainian culture and their contribution to Polish and Ukrainian ethnology and, in general sense, the contribution to the culture of both nations and their mutual relations.
Lud
|
2010
|
vol. 94
191-220
EN
(Polish title: Studia nad literatura ludowa, etnografia, etnologia, antropologia. Kierunki zainteresowan kształtujacej sie w polowie XIX wieku polskiej etnologii/antropologii kulturowej). The aim of the article is to discuss the importance of mid 19th century (1840-1865) for the development of Polish ethnology and cultural anthropology. On the basis of publications and archival materials from that time the author presents ethnological/anthropological interests and studies. Using the terms applied at that time, the author identifies studies of folk literature, ethnography, ethnology and anthropology and indicates the subject and problems of those studies. Folk literature was no longer the main object of interest; it was more often connected with a broader scope of folk culture, studied within the framework of ethnography. A concept of ethnology that focused not on the people - a social layer, but on nationalities and peoples - ethnic groups was developed. Ethnology understood in this way comprised ethnography as an empirical science, aimed at collecting materials. The concept of anthropology as a science with the broadest scope, i.e. comprising the human being belonging to both the world of biology and culture was also known. Polish ethnological/anthropological research was pursued on the basis of the knowledge of the achievements of European science, mainly German and French. The conditions connected with the lack of a national state were also important for the directions of studies. Besides, the lack of the national state made establishment of scientific institutions much more difficult, which, in turn, prevented professionalisation of researchers. Studies pursued in mid 19th c. did not result in the identification of ethnology/cultural anthropology as an independent scientific discipline. However, they created foundations for its emergence at the turn of the 19th c.
Lud
|
2010
|
vol. 94
15-24
EN
(Polish title: (Antropologia kulturowa/etnologia wobec dwoistosci globalizacji. Globalizacja jako element swiata zobiektywizowanego i globalizm jako ideologia). On the one hand globalisation and its consequences create an objective reality and on the other - a subjective reality, which transforms into ideology, i.e. globalism. The author notices both the separateness and autonomy of globalisation as a process and socio-economic state and globalism as ideology and the relations between them. He poses a question about the chronology of the globalisation process, also as regards the evolution of global science, including global cultural anthropology. He is aware of the delays in modern anthropological research on globalisation, but he tries to discover their provenance in earlier studies. In his opinion the involvement of anthropologists in studies on globalisation and development of a programme of such studies not only creates an opportunity for better understanding of the phenomenon but also for further development of anthropology.
DE
Unter verschiedenen Objekten der traditionellen Bebauung des großpolnischen Dorfes nahm einen besonderen Platz hinsichtlich Lage, Form und Funktion die Schmiede, also ein Gebäude, in dem sich die Werkstatt des Schmieds befand, ein. In der letzten Zeit wurden, leider, die meisten von diesen Gebäuden devastiert oder zu mechanischen Werkstätten, Garagen oder sogar Wohnungen umgestaltet. Dieser eigentlich unabwendbare Zustand bewirkte, daß die Bedeutung der hier und dort getroffenen Schmieden immer weniger deutlich ist. Die Verfasser haben also beschlossen, nicht nur das Bild der traditionellen Schmiede und deren Rolle in der sie umgehenden Landschaft zu rekonstruierten, sondern auch die Änderungen, den sie vom 18. bis 20. Jh. unterlagen, darzustellen. Die in der Erarbeitung ausgenutzten Materialien sind vor allem Archivmaterialien, die zum Teil aus den Quellenveröffentlichungen und Maschinenschriften stammen sowie Materialien aus eigenen Geländeuntersuchungen, die mit Informationen aus den Erarbeitungen bereichert wurden. In der Konklusion nahmen die Verfasser an, daß die traditionelle Schmiede gewöhnlich ein freistehendes Gebäude war, dessen Lage vom Bebauungscharakter, Raumplan und Lage des Dorfes gegenüber weniger oder mehr begangenen Wege abhängig war. Unter den Konstruktionen und Werkstoffen dominierten diese, die damals populär waren, jedoch vorausgesetzt, das sie keine Feuergefahrdung schafften. Die richtig eingeschätzte Dauerfestigkeit der Ziegel und der Dachziegel sowie deren Brandschutzeigenschaften haben mit der Zeit bewirkt, daß diese Baustoffe schon im letzten Viertel des 19. Jh. zu Grundbaustoffe beim Bau der Schmieden wurden. Dadurch war die Schmiede, nach Meinung der Verfasser, ein der ersten Dorfobjekte, die am Zivilisationsfortschritt des Dorfes teilgenommen haben und ein der ersten, das sich immer deutlicher in der traditionellen Dorfbebauung (Holz- oder Holz-Lehmbebauung) auszeichnete.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.