Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Book review: Dragan Gajin, Tijana Kojovic Competition Law in Serbia, Kluwer Law International BV, Netherlands, 2017, 168 p.

100%
Gajin D.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2017
|
vol. 10(16)
227-228
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

What’s New in Western Balkans?

100%
Gajin D.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2018
|
vol. 11(18)
285-296
EN
Western Balkan jurisdictions (Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Macedonia (FYROM)) are often outside the focus of the competition community in the EU. This paper aims to rectify that, by providing an overview of the most interesting competition law developments in these jurisdictions during 2017. The overview will show that, despite similarities in their competition legislation, the observed jurisdictions differ when it comes to their priorities in competition law enforcement: while for some the accent is on merger control, for others it is on antitrust. The paper also highlights certain peculiarities of the observed jurisdictions, even though they are all based on the EU model. These include the existence of a notification system with respect to individual exemptions of restrictive agreements in three out of the four observed jurisdictions.
FR
Les juridictions des Balkans occidentaux (Serbie, Monténégro, Bosnie-et-Herzégovine et Macédoine (ARYM)) souvent ne sont pas au centre du débat sur la concurrence d l’UE. Cet article vise à remédier à cela, en donnant un aperçu des plus intéressants développements du droit de la concurrence dans ces pays au cours de 2017. La vue d’ensemble indique que, en dépit des similitudes dans leur législation sur la concurrence, les juridictions observées diffèrent en ce qui concerne leurs priorités en matière d’application du droit de la concurrence: alors que pour certains l’accent est mis sur le contrôle des concentrations, pour d’autres il est sur la concurrence. L’article met également en évidence certaines particularités des juridictions observées, même si elles sont toutes basées sur le modèle de l’UE. Ceux-ci comprennent l’existence d’un système de notification en ce qui concerne les exemptions individuelles des accords restrictifs dans trois des quatre juridictions observées.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.