Recenzja książek: Maciej BIELAWSKI, Higieniści. Z dziejów eugeniki, przeł. Wojciech Chudoba, Wydawnictwo Czarne, Wołowiec 2011, s. 430; oraz Agata STRZĄDAŁA, Od Galtona do Watsona. Przemiany pojmowania eugeniki w XIX i w XX wieku, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole 2010, s. 203.
EN
Review of: Maciej BIELAWSKI, Higieniści. Z dziejów eugeniki, przeł. Wojciech Chudoba, Wydawnictwo Czarne, Wołowiec 2011, s. 430; oraz Agata STRZĄDAŁA, Od Galtona do Watsona. Przemiany pojmowania eugeniki w XIX i w XX wieku, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole 2010, s. 203.
Modern continuations of anthropology and so called “theology” of Hobbes are reviewed, including his phenomenalist theory of space, anthropological monadology, theory of international relations, relation to evolutionism, and compatibilist account of free will. Further analogies with modern doctrines, as econophysics are also considered.
Recenzja książki: Hans-Dieter MUTSCHLER, Fizyka i religia. Perspektywy oraz granice dialogu, przeł. Józef Bremer, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2007, s. 380.
EN
Review of: Hans-Dieter MUTSCHLER, Fizyka i religia. Perspektywy oraz granice dialogu, przeł. Józef Bremer, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2007, s. 380.
Recenzja książki: Piotr JAROSZYŃSKI (red.), Ewolucjonizm czy kreacjonizm, Przyszłość Cywilizacji Zachodu, Fundacja "Lubelska Szkoła Filozofii Chrześcijańskiej", Lublin 2008, s. 374.
EN
Review of: Piotr JAROSZYŃSKI (red.), Ewolucjonizm czy kreacjonizm, Przyszłość Cywilizacji Zachodu, Fundacja "Lubelska Szkoła Filozofii Chrześcijańskiej", Lublin 2008, s. 374.
Recenzja książki: Benjamin BÜHLER, Lebende Körper. Biologisches und anthropologisches Wissen bei Rilke, Döblin und Jünger, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg 2005, s. 325.
EN
Review of: Benjamin BÜHLER, Lebende Körper. Biologisches und anthropologisches Wissen bei Rilke, Döblin und Jünger, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg 2005, s. 325.
In this article author tries to find archaic motives of the sacrifice for demonic creatures, may be old forest deities, associated with folktales with a type of T 1030 „Devil deceived when dividing the crops” (Folktales of Aarne-Thompson-Uther type 1030 „Crop Division between Man and Ogre”). That creatures are presented in Polish folktales as a devil, or as a bear depicted in Russian folktales. Cooperation between the host and the devil brings positive effects to the host, and the devil receives plants that are useless for human being.
At the beginning of the 1990's the American public debate saw the entry of a new participant: the neo-creationist party, or, as they like to call themselves Intelligent Design. Their activities are not limited to critique of these aspects of scientific culture which are dominated by Darwinian evolutionists. The IDers offer alternative concepts, contradicting both Darwinism and many varieties of theistic evolutionism. Creationists often regard the latter as an effect of capitulation of Christianity before naturalism. The ID propaganda rather tends to avoid open conflict with fundamen-talist creationism (mistakenly called creation-science), they however imply that their proposals are more serious than flood geology or young Universe cosmology. The late are regarded by geologists and physicists as curiosa targeted at the scientifically illiterate. Neo-creationists even try to announce a coming revolution in Weltanschauung of the Western science.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.