Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The present conception of personal experience has its foundations and sources of inspiration in the assumptions of W. Stern’s, G. W. Allport’s and R. May’s psychology, in E. Husserl’s and E. Stein’s phenomenological approach and in M. Heidegger’s existential analysis of human-existence-in-the-world. The personal character of experience in psychology is especially explicitly defined when it is stressed that (1) the person has an experience of the self as of the cognizing subject; (2) the person has an experience of being both the subject and the object; (3) the person has an experience of the-world-he-lives-in, and (4) the person has an experience of an existential event. In this context the belief is expressed that the distinguished aspects of personal experience may be the subject of a detailed analysis of empirical data collected in the form of written reports of an actual life event experienced by the person. Hence I suggest a procedure of qualitative analysis of life events that would be treated as a model, which I define - because of its assumptions - as qualitative personalistic analysis. In the final part of the paper I present - as an example - an analysis of M. Heidegger’s own perceptive experience he described (of a blooming tree in the garden). The final result of this kind of analysis is a formulated individual and generalized structure of the described life event as a personal experience.
4
Content available remote

Osobowa postawa wiary: model jakościowej analizy

100%
EN
The problems of faith are taken as one of the basic attitudes in life not only in the recent encyclical Fides et ratioby John Paul II, but also in numerous other publications written by the authorities of contemporary psychology. What they stress in particular is that the attitude of faith adequately develops and grow as the interpersonal relations become more profound, mutual confidence in the reliability of a dialogue with other persons is reinforced and there is an openness to experience life events in all the three dimensions of time. The attitude of faith becomes an integral personal style to adopt a position in life and take an active part with others in life events. This is accompanied by a sense of confidence in the rationality of moral norms, a readiness to seek truth with a belief in human common sense and a conviction about the primary value of life and its developmental capacities. Now, religious faith may develop in the climate of that attitude and it is grounded on a reliable personal testimony of one’s direct or indirect dialogue with God, as a person with a person. In this context it has been particularly stressed how significant it is to refer religious faith, and ground it, on the reliability of the testimony and works of Jesus Christ as a Mediator between man and the Totally Different, transcendent God. The structural qualitative analysis of the personal attitude of faith may constitute a foundation on which to grasp the elements of a reductionistic approach to the manifestations of religious faith. This is especially important when the meaningful dialogal and personal relations are omitted and they are treated merely as manners in which to deal with the subconscious mechanisms of irrational wishes and fears. In the dialogal interpersonal relations one may reasonably give credence to the internal coherence and rationality of the attitude of faith, submitting it to a systematic analysis according to the proposed model procedure.
5
100%
EN
The act of valuation is multidimensional. Values are evaluated not only in the aspect of what “is pleasant,” but also in the aspect of what “is my desire,” “is a challenge for me and I feel obliged to put it into practice.” These three aspects are taken in the terms of V. Frankl’s logotherapy and A. Maslow’s theory of developmental needs, which not so much “push” but rather “pull” as a challenge to treat the world in its suchness, to a better insight into the reality, growth of tolerance and respect for others, to openness to positive interpersonal relations. Maslow describes two ways in which we can approach valuation. They have been operationalized in the terms of characterologically interpreted personal resiliency (PR), which in psychometry corresponds to J. Block’s Ego-Resiliency. A hypothesis has been put forward that the persons with a high PR are characterized by a greater ability to valuation along all the three dimensions and they differ from the persons with a low PR, especially as regards the evaluation of the same values in the aspect: “It is a challenge for me and I feel obliged to put it into practice.” That hypothesis has been confirmed on the basis of the analysis of the empirical data from the study on 153 subjects at the age of 17-18. The study was carried out by means of my own factor version of Maslow’s Security-Insecurity Inventory and the list of 60 values which were assessed separately on the 5-degree scale in view of the three aspects under question. It has been stated that the persons with a high PR assess 60 values in the aspect of “it is pleasant”; they are essentially different from the control group only as regards the assessment of the three values: family, moral good, and dignity of the person. Now as regards the assessment of the same list of values in the aspect “it is my desire” the group of a high PR ranked 10 values as being essentially higher: easiness in adjustment, finding one’s place in the world, personal dignity, social position, carrying out life tasks, abiding by norms and obligations, care about good opinion, respect, spontaneity and carrying out of tasks. Now as regards the assessment of the same list in the aspect of “it is a challenge for me and I feel obliged to put it into practice” the persons with a high PR considerably higher (in relation to the control group) evaluate the following 14 values: moral good, personal dignity, respect, abiding by the norms and obligations, justice, friendship, carrying out life tasks, help to other people, finding one’s place in the world, interests, wisdom, care about good opinion, to be an individuality, and the joy of life. An increase in the number of differentiating values along the dimensions “it is my desire” and “it is a challenge...” is interpreted as an indicator of a greater openness and readiness in the persons with a higher PR to value along all the existential dimensions. In like manner it is confirmed that the postulate to analyze valuation in all the three existential dimensions is right. The correlation between the increase of motivational dynamism and the level of PR is pinpointed, a correlation which conditions an adequate functioning in the interpersonal relations and the development towards emotional and social maturity which D. Goleman defines in terms of emotional intelligence.
6
Content available remote

Kompetencje temporalne – metoda pomiaru

63%
XX
Temporal competence are manifested in having knowledge about one’s own past, presence, and future, and making use of its resources in coping with concrete circumstances. For this kind of competence, a factor tool of measurement has been worked out by the authors – a Questionnaire of Temporal Competence. The method consists of 64 items. in the result of the test six indicators are used: Life Openness, Sense of Life, Prospective Approach, Future Acceptance, Presence Acceptance, and a general indicator. The reliability of the method has been established in a group of 612 respondents – it is high. Diagnostic accuracy has been tested on the basis of 212 respondents tested by the following methods: W. Lens’s Questionnaire of Future Temporal Perspective, E. L. Shostrom’s Temporal Competence Scale, C. S. Nosal’s and B. Bajcar’s Questionnaire of Temporal Orientation AION-99, and A. Antonowski’s Questionnaire of the Sense of Coherence SOC-29.
7
Content available remote

Typy charakteru a obraz siebie

63%
PL
W artykule opisano wielowymiarowe związki miądzy typem charakteru a strukturą obrazu siebie. Badania przeprowadzono w grupie 174 studentów teologii, wykorzystujc Kwestionariusz Stylów Działania (KSD) Z. Uchnasta oraz Tennessee Skal Obrazu Siebie (TSCS) W. H. Fittsa, w tłumaczeniu i opracowaniu Uchnasta. Za pomoc pierwszej metody określono typy charakteru w badanej grupie, natomiast druga metoda posłużyła do opisu struktury obrazu siebie. Przeprowadzone analizy ujawniły istnienie pozytywnego obrazu siebie w grupie osób ukierunkowanych na współdziałanie (synergiczny lub ostrożny typ charakteru). Natomiast negatywny obraz siebie mają osoby ukierunkowane na zabezpieczanie siebie (dostosowujący się lub rywalizujący typ charakteru). Odmienna konfiguracja wyników w skalach TSCS między osobami o typach charakteru zorientowanego na współdziałanie a osobami o typach charakteru zorientowanego na zabezpieczanie siebie wskazuje, że zasadnicza, jakościowa różnica w charakterze osób polega na ich podstawowej orientacji na współdziałanie albo zabezpieczanie siebie.
EN
The present study aims to answer the following question: What multidimensional relationships exist between character type and the structure of a person’s self-concept? We examined 174 students of theology using Z. Uchnast’s Action Styles Questionnaire (KSD) and W. H. Fitts’ Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (TSCS), translated and elaborated by Uchnast. The former method was used to define character types in the examined group. The letter method was used to describe the structure of the individual’s self-concept. Our analysis points to a positive self-concept among those who are oriented toward synergy with others (synergetic or cautious character type). By contrast, people with a negative self-concept are those oriented toward self-preservation (conformist or competitive character type). There is a characteristic dissimilarity in the configuration of TSCS scores between people whose character types are oriented toward synergy and people whose character types are oriented toward self-preservation. The existence of this dissimilarity indicates that the fundamental, qualitative difference between character types lies in their orientation either toward synergy with others or toward self-preservation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.