Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 7 Kontrola Państwowa

Authors help

  1. 7 Padrak R.

Years help

  1. 1 2023

  2. 1 2021

  3. 2 2020

  4. 2 2016

  5. 1 2015

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Postępowanie dyscyplinarne w Najwyższej Izbie Kontroli – orzeczenie o ukaraniu

100%
Padrak R.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2016
|
vol. 61
|
issue 3 (368)
22-36
EN
The article attempts to discuss the contents that should be comprised in the most important decision issued by the NIK Disciplinary Commission, namely a decision on punishment. It provides for assigning the person accused in the disciplinary proceedings with a disciplinary breach, and a decision on punishment. Due to mistakes in the decision contents, the Appeal Disciplinary Commission, or the administrative court that hears the decisions of the Appeal Disciplinary Commission, may overrule the decision. Overruled decisions on punishment and consequent repeated hearing, negatively affect the image of NIK as a widely-recognised institution that performs its duties in a professional manner.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Przebieg rozprawy odwoławczej – postępowanie dyscyplinarne w Najwyższej Izby Kontroli

100%
Padrak R.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2016
|
vol. 61
|
issue 5 (370)
45-62
EN
In the Act of 23rd December 1994 on the Supreme Audit Office, the appeal procedure has been regulated in a very general way, in the chapter entitled Disciplinary Liability of Appointed Auditors. With regard to the manner and course of the procedure, it has been stated that the adjudication team of the Disciplinary Committee for Appeals makes a ruling after the case has been heard. The Act on NIK does not contain provisions that would regulate the course of the adjudicating trial, but it rather refers to appropriate application of other regulations. In his article, the author discusses the stages of the appeal trial: initial proceedings, the disciplinary procedure, opinions of the parties. The article also presents the regulations related to a break and adjournment of the appeal trial applied in the disciplinary procedure at NIK.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Posiedzenie wstępne w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym - odpowiedzialność mianowanych kontrolerów NIK

100%
Padrak R.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2023
|
vol. 68
|
issue 2 (409)
25-44
EN
In Chapter 4a of the Act of 23 December 1994 on the Supreme Audit Office “Disciplinary Liability of Appointed Auditors”, the proceedings in front of the Disciplinary Committee of Appeal are regulated in a very general manner. The Act on NIK does not comprise provisions that would regulate preparations for the main trial. Since the disciplinary proceedings are not comprehensively regulated, Article 97p of the Act on NIK refers to respective application of the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In his article, the author presents the nature and scope of a preliminary session within preparations for the main trial in the NIK disciplinary proceedings conducted in front of the adjudicative panel of the Disciplinary Committee. The judicature has been presented that should be or can be made during such sessions. The author refers to literature on legal matters related to criminal proceedings.
PL
Instytucja posiedzenia wstępnego w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym w Najwyższej Izbie Kontroli nie była dotąd przedmiotem odrębnego opracowania. Jego przebieg nie został unormowany w ustawie o NIK. Ustawodawca zastosował technikę legislacyjną polegającą na odesłaniu do odpowiedniego stosowania przepisów Kodeksu postępowania karnego. W artykule omówiono przebieg posiedzenia wstępnego, zarysowano też możliwe problemy związane z jego organizacją. Autor posiłkuje się literaturą prawniczą z zakresu postępowania karnego.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Miejsce wykonywania pracy mianowanych kontrolerów - prawo, doktryna, regulacje wewnętrzne NIK

100%
Padrak R.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2020
|
vol. 65
|
issue 2 (391)
21-41
EN
Workplace –as an element of employment relationship –is of great importance to the protection of employees’ rights. Its appropriate definition plays a significant role in the interpretation of the regulations setting out, e.g. business trips. It is a complex issue, mostly due to the lack of a definition of the notion of ‘workplace’. The provisions of the Law on the Supreme Audit Office, as well as those of the other labour regulations, do not regulate the issue precisely. In his article, the author presents the existing judicature and doctrine related toworkplace in its legal sense. He also refers tothe views on potential ways todefine it with regard tothe NIK nominated auditors, depending on the type of the work they do. It is an attempt on an original discussion on the issue, which takes into account the internal regulations of NIK.
PL
Miejsce wykonywania pracy jako element treści stosunku pracy ma doniosłe znaczenie dla ochrony praw pracownika. Prawidłowe jego określenie odgrywa istotną rolę w interpretacji przepisów regulujących na przykład przebywanie w podróży służbowej. Jest to zagadnienie skomplikowane, przede wszystkim ze względu na brak definicji miejsca pracy. Przepisy ustawy o Najwyższej Izbie Kontroli, podobnie jak innych pragmatyk, nie regulują jednoznacznie wszystkich kwestii z tym związanych. Artykuł przybliża dorobek orzecznictwa i doktryny dotyczący miejsca wykonywania pracy w znaczeniu prawnym. Prezentuje też poglądy na temat możliwych sposobów jego określenia w stosunku do mianowanych kontrolerów NIK, w zależności od rodzaju wykonywanej przez nich pracy. Jest próbą autorskiego ujęcia problemu, uwzględniającego wewnętrzne regulacje Izby.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Ustalanie opłaty planistycznej – procedura, przesłanki oraz propozycje zmian w obowiązującym prawie

100%
Padrak R.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2015
|
vol. 60
|
issue 2 (361)
116-131
EN
The re-zoning fee is one of the revenues of municipalities. Nevertheless, municipalities usually do not obtain the expected revenue from re-zoning fees. This should be, primarily, attributed to the fact that estate owners withhold the sale of land until the claims for re-zoning fees expire, and to the relatively high effectiveness of appeals against the decisions on the basis of which fees are set. Another important factors are the following: abandoning the calculation and execution of re-zoning fees as a result of poor organisation of work, tardiness in issuing decisions on the fee that sometimes results in expiration of the claim, as well as insufficient and ineffective vindication. Due to the above reasons, the Supreme Audit Office has examined the issue of calculating and settlement and execution of the re-zoning fees. The article is an attempt to present the most significant legal questions related to re-zoning fees, to identify faulty regulations and to list changes in the binding law that NIK has proposed.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wadium w postępowaniach o zamówienia publiczne : Zmiana przepisów od 2021 r.

100%
Padrak R.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2020
|
vol. 65
|
issue 4 (393)
124-148
EN
Starting from 1st January 2021, the Act of 29th January 2004 Public Procurement Law will no longer be in force, and the Act of 11th September 2019 Public Procurement Law will come into force, which in a comprehensive way regulates the proceedings relat ed to public procurement. These proceedings may include the legal concept of a bid bond, defined as a set sum of money, or respective guarantee for its payment, being a prerequisite for a bidder to participate in the procurement proceedings. The reason for setting a bid bond by purchasers is to protect their interests. The notion of a bid bond was regulated in Article 45 and 46 of the currently binding act, and from the year 2021 the regulations related to bid bond will be set out in Articles 97 and 98 of the new Act. In order to facilitate the public procurement procedure, the Act of 2019 Public Procurement Law, to be in force soon, does not differentiate between an oblig atory and non-obligatory bid bond. The deadline for returning the bid bond, in other forms than monetary, has been clarified in the new law, too. New regulations have been also introduced with regard to the volume of bid bond, and the manner of its retaining. A single bid bond form was abandoned. In the new Public Procurement Law, a bid bond is non-obligatory only, and it lies with the purchasing party, whenever a bid bond is foreseen in the proceedings. If it is foreseen, the provision and retaining of a bid bond over the time of the proceeding is a prerequisite for entering and participating in the public procurement procedure. The obligation to provide a bid bond on time lies with the contractor, and it should be provided before the deadline for submitting the offer. It means that a bid bond can be foreseen only in those proceedings where the contractor submits the offer, which excludes a bid bond being set in free proceedings. The volume of bid bond depends, as set out in the Law on Public Procurement of 2019, on the value of the order. In the case of orders that are lower than the Union’s threshold, the volume of bid bond cannot exceed 1.5 percent of the purchase value, while in other cases – 3 percent. The reasons for returning the bid bond ex officio include: (1) expiry of the deadline until which the offer is binding; (2) concluding a public procurement offer; (3) an nulation of the proceeding, except for a situation when an appeal has not been set for annulation, or the deadline for appeal has not been exceeded. A bid bond repayment is possible if: (1) an offer has been withdrawn before the deadline for offers submission; (2) an offer has been rejected; (3) after the most beneficial offer has been selected – to the contractor whose offer has not been selected; (4) after the procedure has been annulled, except for cases when an appeal for annulation has not settled, or when the deadline for its submission has not expired. A bid bond should be returned no later than within seven days from the date of the circumstances listed above. A bid bond submitted in cash should be returned in cash, while non-monetary bid bonds – by pro viding the guarantor with a declaration of will about the bid bond release. A bid bond return is not possible if some reasons for its retaining exist, i.e.: (1) when the contracting party fails to provide appropriate documents or declarations required by the purchaser; (2) a consent for correcting mistakes in an offer has not been given, in the case of mistakes other than obvious spelling or calculation mistakes; (3) a refusal to sign a contract on public procurement; (4) a failure to provide the required guar antee to perform the contact by the contractor with whom the contract is concluded. Retention of a cash bid bond denotes that the money on their bank account becomes their ownership. In the case of a non-cash bid bond, a bid bond retention means that the guarantor demands the bid bond value to be aid.
PL
Wadium jest formą zabezpieczenia interesu prawnego zamawiającego. Ustanowienie go wzmacnia obowiązek zawarcia umowy przez wykonawcę, ponieważ gwarantuje zamawiającemu uzyskanie rekompensaty w razie wystąpienia przesłanek zatrzymania wadium. Stanowi ono również barierę finansową zapewniającą przystąpienie do przetargu jedynie podmiotom zainteresowanym zawarciem umowy i zdolnym do zrealizowania zamówienia. Od przyszłego roku zmienią się związane z tym przepisy.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kształtowanie wynagrodzeń w spółkach z udziałem JST : Członkowie organów zarządzających i nadzorczych

100%
Padrak R.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2021
|
vol. 66
|
issue 4 (399)
134-151
EN
The article presents the execution of rights of local self-government units stemming from shares in trading companies, related to the remuneration of members of their man aging and supervisory bodies. It comprises two elements. The first element is fixed, and depends on a company’s average annual employment, annual net turnover on sales of goods and services, financial operations and assets. The other element is related to management objectives fulfilment, and it makes an obligatory, motivating element of the remuneration. In the article, the author discusses the responsibilities of local self-gov ernment officials stemming from the provisions on remuneration of persons managing some companies, considering differences resulting from their capital engagement vol ume. The author also presents methodological guidance and key risks that may arise when such matters are audited.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono sposób wykonywania uprawnień z udziałów (akcji) spółek handlowych przysługujących jednostkom samorządu terytorialnego (JST), dotyczących ustalania wynagrodzeń członków organów zarządzających i nadzorczych tych podmiotów. Przybliżono obowiązki samorządów wynikające z przepisów ustawy o zasadach kształtowania wynagrodzeń osób kierujących niektórymi spółkami, z uwzględnieniem odmienności wynikających z wielkości ich zaangażowania kapitałowego. Zaprezentowano również wskazówki metodyczne i kluczowe obszary ryzyka, mogącego wystąpić w czasie kontroli tych zagadnień.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.